Posted on 07/20/2002 7:32:37 PM PDT by jern
As a UNC-Chapel Hill Alumnus, I was appalled but not surprised by their "summer reading requirement" that we learned about several weeks - was it months - ago.
The same group that runs the Democratic Party in North Carolina also runs the University system. It is one big happy family, so to speak. The amoral, anti-God, anti-Jesus Christ humanistic dictators who tolerate everything except classic Christianity are in charge both in Chapel Hill and in the NC Democratic Party. We must never forget the connection.
Let's see. These dictators have now decreed that Christians (or Jewish) students attending UNC-Chapel Hill who object to being forced to read the Koran must defend their objection in a paper. Does this not smack of the communist tradition wherein the person who did not obey the dictates of "the party" as represented by, say, the Red Guard, was to be forced to confess the error of their ways before the village mob while sitting on a stool with a dunce cap on their head?
Further, is this latest monstrosity from Chapel Hill not something akin to violating today's "tolerance dogma" to the point that a student who so objects to the forced reading of the book about the Koran - which contains parts of the Koran itself - is made to be the the target of clucking tongues both of self-important professors and cynical fellow students?
Such students may be branded throughout their time at the University. ("Oh, he was one of those Christian fundamentalists who didn't think her was secure enough in his faith to read about the Koran").
Most students would just say - what the hey - it's no big deal - read the stupid book.
Yet even these dull ones should not be forced to read this book - under any circumstances - none whatever.
Not unless the "elite" would similarly force incoming students to read, say, "Mere Christainity" by CS Lewis or "How Shall We Then Live" by Francis Schaeffer.
Until that day dawns, this "required" reading or required paper defending no reading - should be totally eliminated by the - Demonazi - tolerance promoting - humanist dogmatists at UNC.
Bet the only reason is that the fetus may be a male.
That's a good question Sarah; I think you can probably answer it yourself by asking just two questions:
#1) When is the last time you heard of Christian's killing babies in strollers and teachers driving to school and having thousands of other Christian's approving of it?
#2) Just what was the religion of the people who are doing the killing of innocents in the past two years, with the full approval of most of their fellow 'believers.'
Bottom line - Islam has some real problems when it comes to non-believers; in fact it has some real problems dealing with it's own believer's who may disagree or question the 'Islamic' PC notions of the current era...just open your eyes and look around in today's world.
I know who I would want as MY neighbors and I know who I would want to live as far away from my wife and four children. I place militant Islamist right up there with child molestors as far as 'good' neighbors is concerned - just ask the Israelis....
I'm sure I won't change your mind, perhaps time will help you realize there are 'good' guys and there are some real 'bad' guys in this world; you have to decide who they are in your own eyes. I have.
- sincerely - Van Jenerette
zip: So, how-to books on pornography, performing abortions, making bombs, torture etc etc could be required reading and that would be ok with you???????
Sure, if the subject of the course made it important to know about such things. Given that we are in a war with radical Islam, anyone who doesn't want to know more about radical Islam is, in my opinion, a moron. If I were teaching a course about the rise and fall of the Third Reich I would assign "Mein Kampf." If I were teaching a course on slavery I'd assign "Gone with the Wing." If I were teaching a course on aberant sexuality I would think a porn book might be entirely appropriate. As a matter of fact I once had a roomate who was in medical school. He used to read to me from one of his texts. He said when they discussed it in class it was like "dirty stories" hour. I don't what's to be afraid of in a book, unless one can't stand being challenged or offended.
What position has Elizabeth Dole taken on this issue?
It pointed out that one short sura was devoted entirely to a business dispute between Mohammed and another merchant, with Allah directing the other merchant to pay Mohammed. It noted that this sura raised not the slighest suspicion among the faithful who never questioned why a book intended for the ages would waste an entire sura on a self-serving trivial issue that in a few short years would be meaningless.
I'd like to find a book (not encyclopaedia sized) that presents an accurate historical analysis of Islam without a spin from any religion. Just the facts, from a pre-PC era.
Any recommendations?
By the way, here's his address if anyone wants to send him mail: cernst@email.unc.edu
I'm going to send him the picture in post #10 to show him my objections to the book.
Don't tell anyone I said this, but freep away.
Arab countries probably don't have courses on Judism, Luthernism and Catholicism because those are backward societies with closed minds. I see no reason for a free and open society like America to imitate the worst the world has to offer. By the way, American students don't HAVE to take courses in Islam if they don't want to. It's only required at Chapel Hill. Anyone who would rather not know about Islam has about 2999 other American colleges and universities to attend.
By the way, 23 consecutive question marks does not constitute a telling riposte.
"The Law" was the set of rules handed down for the nation of Israel with the intent that the nation would 'evangelize' the rest of the world should they follow it. (You may have noticed that they didn't.) That is my understanding of it.
So then, since the Law wasn't intended for Christians to follow, they aren't "ingoring" it when they don't stone their kids for every little disobedient act (though that is an extreme oversimplification of that specific law).
More willing? I don't think people there have any choice what so ever. You either submit to the brainwasing, or you get your head chopped off....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.