Replies

Repost from the end of the old thread. I'm still trying to get someone to say I'm nuts.

The following is speculation based on some strange facts.

1. The Police Chief and the DA and Dusek promised us they found blood in the Motorhome and on DW clothes.

2. The evidence is that two stains in those locations do contain the DNA of Danielle.

3. Neither stain was tested with a conclusive test for blood.

4. LE did test other stains with a conclusive test for "human blood" (stairway stain), so they have the right tests available.

5. LE did not have any Danielle blood to "Flake".

6. You can't clone blood.

7. You can clone DNA, use PCR to make as much as you need (start with Danielle's underware)

8. LE did have all the DNA needed to "Flake".

QED 150,000,000,000,000,000 to one odds DW did it.
150,000,000,000,000,000 to one odds DW was framed.

3. Neither stain was tested with a conclusive test for blood.

I am confused here. I could have sworn they said the stains on his jacket and on the floor outside the bathroom of the motorhome were blood.

Am I wrong here?

What I want to know is are they going to charge Westerfield for Samathas rape and murder....

Does anyone else wonder if there is a connection beside me?

Could Danielle been a random victim?

Could the parents ,because they were high not realized that she was taken th night before?