Rocket Man - Elton John
PARODY - SOUTHWEST GIRL
She packed her bags last night, pre-flight
Smoked her stash from 5 to10
Duh-Knees is gon-na be high; as a kite by then...
"I miss Poway so much I miss his wife!!"
It's lonely in Florida....
Unemployed....
I can't fly
And it's gonna be a long time til' she swings again...
Till Damon brings her in the VD fold with him..
"I'm not the woman they think I am at work"
Oh no no no I'm a POT HEAD
POT HEAD burning a joint sitting all alone
Sabre ain't the kind of place; to raise your kids
In fact it's dangerous as hell
And there's nosy neighbors everywhere, snooping in!!
And all this police stuff I don't understand
I simply party, 5 days a week...
A POT HEAD, a POT HEAD
And it's gonna be a long time til' she swings again...
Till Damon brings her in the fold with him..
"I'm not the woman they think I am at work"
Oh no no no I'm a POT HEAD
POT HEAD burning a joint sitting all alone
1 posted on
07/16/2002 10:37:13 PM PDT by
FresnoDA
To: MizSterious; spectre; Amore; Travis McGee; BunnySlippers; DoughtyOne; Hillary's Lovely Legs; ...
PING....BUZZZZZZ!!!
2 posted on
07/16/2002 10:37:58 PM PDT by
FresnoDA
To: FresnoDA
Where were all these EXPERTS for the VINNEY FOSTER CASE? HUH?
3 posted on
07/16/2002 10:40:56 PM PDT by
Vidalia
To: FresnoDA
Repost from the end of the old thread. I'm still trying to get someone to say I'm nuts.
The following is speculation based on some strange facts.
1. The Police Chief and the DA and Dusek promised us they found blood in the Motorhome and on DW clothes.
2. The evidence is that two stains in those locations do contain the DNA of Danielle.
3. Neither stain was tested with a conclusive test for blood.
4. LE did test other stains with a conclusive test for "human blood" (stairway stain), so they have the right tests available.
5. LE did not have any Danielle blood to "Flake".
6. You can't clone blood.
7. You can clone DNA, use PCR to make as much as you need (start with Danielle's underware)
8. LE did have all the DNA needed to "Flake".
QED 150,000,000,000,000,000 to one odds DW did it.
150,000,000,000,000,000 to one odds DW was framed.
To: FresnoDA
Thanks for the ping. Looks like Snoozeusek is worried about something Humm?
To: FresnoDA
Chaminade University in Hawaii Chaminade is a top 20 univeristy, I mean top 100, Uhhh top 500? OK it's in the US...
13 posted on
07/16/2002 11:22:55 PM PDT by
Drango
To: FresnoDA
Dusek had to find another expert or DW would have been acquitted, possibly on a directed verdict if Mudd had the guts to do it; which he doesn't. Feldman will obviously hire another expert witness so it will then be 2 experts angainst one expert. If Feldman can somehow, obtain concetions from this new expert, it is all over and Dw will be acquitted. Dusek should have anticipated the problems with Feldman's testimony and had another expert testify during the prosecution case.
To: FresnoDA
Goff said maggots indicated that Huskey was in custody at the time the woman's body was dumped, but Haskell put the time at a few days before his arrest. A clash of academic egotists? Could be fun. Interesting that in this earlier case, Goff testified to an later date. In the DW trial, Goff will apparently be trying to justify a much, much earlier/longer PMI; a fact that certainly won't escape the attention of Feldman. If a second prosecution can't explain a two week gap, DW will be acquitted for sure. Even if Goff is able to withstand what is sure to be a very detailed cross-examination by Feldman, Haskell would be there to offer a third expert opinion to conteract Goff. Then the experts would be 2-1 in favor of the defense; hardly good enough to get a conviction.
To: FresnoDA
"[P]roviding testimony seems to be more important than providing commentary," Goff wrote in an e-mail, explaining why he could no longer comment on the case. This quote caught my eye, and I haven't seen anyone else comment, so I'll at least ask. It implies that Goff has commented on the case previously - presumably on the insect testimony. Does anyone know what he said?
I'm also curious as to whether he's already done any work on the case. Does the prosecution know his findings in advance. It would be extremely damning to them if he winds up agreeing with Faulkner.
Drew Garrett
39 posted on
07/17/2002 10:30:37 AM PDT by
agarrett
To: FresnoDA
Hey, if you don't like the expert you hired, just hire another one, right? After all, you have unlimited taxpayer money to spend!
To: FresnoDA
Because each scientist has his own method of determining the life spans, the process can lead to disagreement, Merritt said. Rarely, however, does the disagreement concern the 15-day disparity in the Westerfield case.
BTTT
49 posted on
07/17/2002 11:20:02 AM PDT by
pyx
To: FresnoDA
M. Lee Goff, a professor of forensic sciences at Chaminade University in Hawaii, said that as of Friday morning, he is working for the San Diego District Attorney's office on the case.If you were a juror and realized that the prosecution first hired Faulkner and then discovered that during the recess (months later) they hired another bug guy because they were apparently unhappy with THEIR first choice, wouldn't you question their real agenda?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson