A clash of academic egotists? Could be fun. Interesting that in this earlier case, Goff testified to an later date. In the DW trial, Goff will apparently be trying to justify a much, much earlier/longer PMI; a fact that certainly won't escape the attention of Feldman. If a second prosecution can't explain a two week gap, DW will be acquitted for sure. Even if Goff is able to withstand what is sure to be a very detailed cross-examination by Feldman, Haskell would be there to offer a third expert opinion to conteract Goff. Then the experts would be 2-1 in favor of the defense; hardly good enough to get a conviction.