Posted on 07/09/2002 12:50:37 PM PDT by Doc-Joe
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:00:49 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
2. Should President Bush replace SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt?
3. Do questions about President Bush's activities as an oil company board member limit his effectiveness in dealing with concerns about corporate behavior?
(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...
CNN will use these figures as gospel.
No. I support enforcing the existing laws, which are quite adequate for dealing with corporate malfeasance.
They are not, however, adequate for getting face time and sound bites on TV.
Yes 97%
No 2%
Don't know 1%
total responses to this question: 10712
2. Should President Bush replace SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt?
Yes 49%
No 32%
Don't know 19%
total responses to this question: 10729
3. Do questions about President Bush's activities as an oil company board member limit his effectiveness in dealing with concerns about corporate behavior?
Yes 47%
No 47%
Not sure 6%
total responses to this question: 10756
I voted "No" to all questions, btw. It seems to me that we have enough laws on the books as it is.
Did she happen to mention Cattlegate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.