Fury as academics are sacked for being Israeli

A British academic has sparked worldwide protests after sacking two scholars from her highly respected international journals because they are Israeli.

Mona Baker, a professor at the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST), admitted yesterday that she had dismissed Dr Miriam Shlesinger and Prof Gideon Toury because of their nationality.

Despite a storm of complaints raised by her action, Prof Baker stood by her decision, telling The Telegraph: “I deplore the Israeli state. Miriam knew that was how I felt and that they would have to go because of the current situation.”

Prof Baker asked Dr Shlesinger and Prof Toury to resign from the boards of two academic journals she owns, after signing a website petition last month calling for academics to boycott Israel. When they refused to resign she sacked them.

The dismissals raised no public opposition from within British universities. International academics, however, led by Prof Stephen Greenblatt, a world-renowned Shakespeare scholar at Harvard University, have now condemned the decision and called on British academics to stand up for intellectual freedom.

Prof Greenblatt, who flew to England last night to collect an honorary degree from London University, said that Prof Baker’s actions were “repellent”, “dangerous” and “intellectually and morally bankrupt”.

He described any policy of singling out a group for collective punishment as “grotesque”. He added: “Excluding scholars because of the passports that they carry or because of their skin colour, religion or political party, corrupts the integrity of intellectual work.”

Both of the sacked scholars had worked for the periodicals for three years. Dr Shlesinger, who enjoyed a friendship with Prof Baker and was even a guest at her house in Manchester, worked for the editorial board of The Translator. Prof Toury, who teaches at Tel Aviv University, held an honorary advisory role at Translation Studies Abstracts.

Dr Shlesinger, a respected American-born academic at the Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv, is also a former chairman of Amnesty International in Israel and has criticised her country’s policies in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

Prof Baker, who is the director of the centre for translation and intercultural studies at UMIST, was unrepentant, however. Although the boards of the journals remained split over the dismissals, Prof Baker said: “I am not against Israeli nationals per se; it is Israeli institutions as part of the Israeli state which I absolutely deplore.

She said that her actions were “my interpretation of what a boycott of Israel means”. Prof Baker added: “Many people in Europe have signed a boycott against Israel. Israel has gone beyond just war crimes.

It is horrific what is going on there. Many of us would like to talk about it as some kind of Holocaust which the world will eventually wake up to, much too late, of course, as they did with the last one.”

She conceded, however, that the pair would not have been sacked had they lived in Britain and severed their ties with Israeli institutions.

The petition that Prof Baker signed claims that Israel should be boycotted because it is “racist.” Prof Baker, who refused to disclose where she was born, claimed that her actions were supported by a growing number of academics across Britain and in Germany. She alleged that since the sackings she had been the victim of a hate campaign.

“My husband and I receive hate mail every day, up to 50 [letters] a day, some of it extremely obscene,” she said. “I can’t read it out it is so obscene and very threatening. It is also sent to my university, to my vice-chancellor and to some of my colleagues, and they threaten people who want to stay on the board. The Americans are the worst offenders.

“There is a large intimidation machine out there which is waiting to intimidate anyone that it doesn’t approve of.”

In an open letter to Prof Baker, however, Prof Greenblatt, the president of the Modern Language Association of America, described the “chilling shadow” cast by her actions. “An attack on cultural co-operation, with a particular group singled out for collective punishment violates the essential spirit of scholarly freedom and the pursuit of truth,” he wrote.

“The pursuit of knowledge does not suddenly come to a halt at national borders. This does not mean that serious scholars must be indifferent to the world’s murderous struggles, but it does mean that they are committed to an ongoing, frank conversation . . . [that] often includes passionate disagreement.”

The letter is understood to have the backing of other senior academics at Harvard. Following calls from The Telegraph, a number of leading academics in Britain lent their voice to Prof Greenblatt’s condemnation.

Francis Robinson, a professor of history at London University, said: “Whatever anyone feels about Israel, this is absolutely appalling. Certainly there are strong feelings, not often spoken but nevertheless strongly felt, shared by the majority of British liberal intellectuals about the problems with Israel. Nonetheless, this sounds dreadful. It runs counter to the very principles of academic freedom.”

Prof Greenblatt’s intervention was welcomed by Lord Janner, the chairman of the Holocaust Educational Trust. He said that the sackings set a worrying precedent: “This is disgraceful and dangerous. You should no more sack an Israeli academic for his nationality than you should a Palestinian in the same situation.

“I do not buy this argument that, just because there are more fee-paying Arab students at UMIST and elsewhere, their views should prevail. In every university in the UK today there are problems between the two groups. They must try to insulate themselves from what is happening in the Middle East or else you are going to get the most terrible conflicts seeping into our university campuses.”

Prof John Garside, the vice-chancellor of UMIST, distanced himself from the debate. Even though Prof Baker uses UMIST’s logo in her promotional material for the journals, he said: “The position of UMIST is that the two journals Prof Baker is involved with have nothing to do with UMIST.

“These are activities that she is involved with in her own time. What happens on those journals and the editorial policy on those journals are entirely a matter for those journals. It’s an issue that we are dealing with internally and not something I want to make any public statement about at this stage.”

A spokesman for the Israeli embassy said: “We think the Palestinian cause is not helped in any way by people trying to shut down those who communicate across boundaries through dialogue and the exchange of ideas. It’s the rejection of the legitimacy of the state of Israel itself which lies at the core of the Israeli-Arab conflict.”

Though, it would raise plenty of ire outside of the university system and its subjects.

Now THAT is a useful metaphor...I had never thought of using the Feudal system for our Higher learning institutions...kind of puts them in the prospective where they SHOULD be...PRIVATE SECTOR SINK OR SWIM FACTORIES...rather than the lofty papal untouchability and fourth estate unimpeachability that they currently enjoy without earning AT ALL!

A native of Egypt

Rediculous, transparant, political. The university should sack her for such an unwarranted, transparantly political move.

At least she didn't shoot up the El Al terminal at Heathrow.

Yep, it is pathetic. If Al-Arian just said how much he hated Israel, there would be no grounds to fire him. But he has raised money for terrorists and used his postion as a public employee to further the well being of violent criminals, and they still won't do it.

In this case, the victims were 2 peaceniks. But that didn't save their arses from losing their jobs based simply on their race (yes, in Europe race is defined very loosely to include "nationality", as in "the German race").

Face it. America is simply a more tolerant place than the UK and Europe, no matter what those crooked teeth crumpet eating croissant breath sourkraut stuffing smoked salmon waffle eating fools think.

“My husband and I receive hate mail every day, up to 50 [letters] a day,
some of it extremely obscene,” she said.....
The Americans are the worst offenders.

I think I'm having a "Proud To Be An American" moment.....

"I called her Jihadist slut. I feel terrible and promise not to do this again."

Still the poet I see. heh heh

Nam Vet

it's be not only stupid but dangerous for us to sit back and watch the left eat each other, because we're going to get damaged in the process.

What can they do to the right? They already censor conservatives at universities. It is no accident that the vast majority of tenured professors at major universities are marxists. Conservative student newspapers are almost routinely stolen from news stands. Justice Clarence Thomas has been "dis-invited" to speak at universities after left wing protests. David Horowitz has to hire armed guards when he appears on some campuses.

It is better to let them go at each other. Perhaps they will begin to understand the value of the "diversity" and free speech they pretend to honor.

May it increase by several orders of magnitude, until you are suffering daily panic attacks, you vile, Jew-hating savage.

Oh, I forgot, I think the proper EU phrase is "You shitty little woman."

I doubt the same actions would raise opposition from within American universities either.

I would argue from the article that it already has. And at least here it's illegal. Apparently, Jew-firing is quite acceptable in the ultracivilized, superior European Union.

He described any policy of singling out a group for collective punishment as “grotesque”.

This is what I have been saying here for awhile.

He added: “Excluding scholars because of the passports that they carry or because of their skin colour, religion or political party, corrupts the integrity of intellectual work.”

Personally,if the institution took any statist money,I would prefer that it was mandatory that they hire only fellow countrymen.

I'm not sure I see the problem here. If the journal is privately operated, the editor and publisher have a right to print what they want to print. If you don't like it, then start an international journal of your own. If people pay the money, they get to call the tune. It's called capitalism and freedom, get over it.

If the journal is subsidized in some way by the British government, then that's another matter, and it points up once again how 'impartial' and 'objective' governments really aren't, and why a truly free market of ideas requires a free market economy.

We should then get in contact with whomever the new grand kegle of the Klan is and demand she be immediately inducted into that august organization. They should also have an international press conference to announce this great event.

I haven't written her a letter yet, because I'm trying to figure out the best approach to use.

One of my ideas is to write her a letter in the style of a rabid neo-Nazi, heartily applauding her actions and treating her like a compatriot, suggesting other ways she can help "the cause", and asking her what her favorite forms of extermination are.

On the other hand, maybe she'd be flattered.

You know what they say: "If everything seems to be coming your way, consider that you might be in the wrong lane."

Actually, dennisw, I've been rethinking that post. Yes, the Leftists attack each other, using any excuse, but it's also true that the Left really does hate Israel and it hates Jews, and will attack both at the drop of a hat.

Just remembering how brutally anti-semitic Leftist Berkeley is. That's just one example.

What's also funny is that the liberals (both here and in Europe) are hair-trigger quick to label anyone two inches or more to the right of themselves "Nazis" or "fascists", and yet I've been astounded over the past few years how closely the liberals are retracing the Nazis' early footsteps, apparently down the same road.
Interesting that "Fascist" is the lowest insult of the liberal. After their "Great Patriotic War" it was the favorite insult of the Soviet communist as well. Must be a coincidence.

fas[cism

a system of government characterized by rigid one-party dictatorship, forcible suppression of opposition, private economic enterprise under centralized governmental control, and racism, etc.: first instituted in Italy in 1922

Sounds exactly like the left to me.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.