Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEDS CLEANING, PRUNING NEAR UA TELESCOPES
THE ARIZONA DAILY STAR ^ | July 3, 2002 | By Mitch Tobin

Posted on 07/06/2002 11:57:00 AM PDT by madfly

By Mitch Tobin , ARIZONA DAILY STAR


With pressure from the University of Arizona, the U.S. Forest Service has quietly begun pruning and cleaning the forest around the telescopes atop Mount Graham.

The work, within critical habitat for an endangered squirrel, comes as UA officials worry about a catastrophic wildfire roaring through a $120 million telescope complex that environmentalists and some American Indians have fought for more than a decade.

In 1996, flames from a 6,716-acre wildfire came within 200 yards of the telescopes. As the monsoon arrives, the top of the Pinaleno Mountains, 75 miles northeast of Tucson, is regularly pelted with lightning.

The pruning operation, which also involves removing "down and dead wood" from the floor of the spruce-fir forest, began Tuesday and was expected to be completed by today, said Gail Aschenbrenner, a Forest Service spokeswoman.

"It's not a huge project," she said, "but I think it will do a lot to reduce the risk without doing any thinning or tree cutting."

The endangered Mount Graham red squirrel had been seen in the past in the area being pruned and cleaned. But the animal is not known to live there now, probably because the forest has been decimated by an insect infestation, according to a Forest Service memo authorizing the work.

The memo, signed Tuesday by Coronado National Forest Supervisor John McGee, said branches will be pruned from both living and dead trees up to 10 feet off the ground within a 200-foot perimeter of UA's Large Binocular Telescope and up to 150 feet from two smaller telescopes. Crews also will remove deadwood less than 6 inches wide that is already on the forest floor. Flammable material within 10 feet of diesel storage tanks will be raked down to mineral soil.

No trees are being cut, and no vehicles are allowed off existing roads, according to the memo.

Longtime opponents of the telescope construction gave mixed reviews of the Forest Service's decision.

David Hodges, executive director of the Sky Island Alliance, was wary about the UA "coming up with new reasons why they want to expand beyond their footprint." But he said, "If this is all they're doing, we think it's acceptable."

Hodges, however, worries about the UA's desire to take the fireproofing further by cutting down trees that surround the telescopes, which lie within Southern Arizona's only old-growth spruce-fir forest.

Dr. Robin Silver of the Center for Biological Diversity
said the pruning and cleaning were "just another example of the university wasting money," since it was leaving behind the "duff" layer of debris on the forest floor that helps fire spread.

UA and Forest Service officials, however, say this week's operation is based on expert advice from Jack Cohen, a structure protection specialist at the Forest Service's fire lab in Missoula, Mont. Cohen visited Mount Graham last week.

The pruning and cleaning are "a good first step," said Buddy Powell, associate director of UA's Steward Observatory.

* Contact reporter Mitch Tobin at 573-4185 or mtobin@azstarnet.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: center4biodverstee; enviralists; esa; fireprevention; forests; jackcohen; klamathlist; robinsilver; squirrels; structureprotection; telescopes; uofa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Someone doesn't want us reading this story!

It has been pulled from the AZ Daily Star's site. The story appears on Yahoo for the moment. Maybe the author knows something about it.

Contact reporter Mitch Tobin at 573-4185 or mtobin@azstarnet.com.

Also, link on Phxnews.com today for same story is dead.

http://www.phxnews.com/new/fullstory.php?article=599

1 posted on 07/06/2002 11:57:00 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Libertarianize the GOP; Stand Watch Listen; freefly; expose; ...
ping
2 posted on 07/06/2002 11:58:04 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists
Index Bump
3 posted on 07/06/2002 12:00:42 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Being temoparily inconvenienced is a much better alternative for the squirrels than is being toasted, roasted and flambe'd.
4 posted on 07/06/2002 12:05:41 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
'One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind"

Could the worm be turning?
5 posted on 07/06/2002 12:07:09 PM PDT by dtel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: madfly
How the hell do they know that a tree squirrel has a low enough population to be endangered? I don't believe a word of it because squirrels live frickin' everywhere!
7 posted on 07/06/2002 12:13:45 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
by cutting down trees that surround the telescopes, which lie within Southern Arizona's only old-growth spruce-fir forest.

Cut them down and build a work camp for the environazis and officials that are responsible for these idiotic policies. ;-)

8 posted on 07/06/2002 12:23:37 PM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanks for the ping...

Notice how the FS is so scared of these enviro-Nazis that they specifically say that no trees of any size will be cut. And even clearing the deadwood is abhorrent to these nutcases.

BTW, the Az Daily Star/Yahoo link is active as of the time and date of the post.

9 posted on 07/06/2002 12:51:32 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Someone doesn't want us reading this story!

Looks like the press censors must have either left early on Wednesday to get a start
on their four-day do-nothing July 4th vacation...or they were knocking back Rum and Cokes
before noon on Wednesday.

Reminds me of how the story about the Russians finally revealed that they executed
Raoul Wallenberg because they didn't know what to make of a man who was risking his
life to save innocent civilians...and Jews at that.
To the Soviets, this was either a dangerous or psychotic personality, might as well shot him.

I don't remember the exact date, but it was quietly pushed out the door during a holiday...
at Thanksgiving or Xmas time...when the regular press censors are either drunk,
stoned and/or on vacation.
10 posted on 07/06/2002 1:08:24 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BTTT!!!!
11 posted on 07/06/2002 1:10:38 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Someone doesn't want us reading this story!

The anointed at the universities don't want full exposure of their values system.
(although it's clear to anyone with half-a-brain)

Removing overgrowth to protect some pin-head astronomers government-supported
telescope...GOOD...even if it endangers a life-form.

Removing overgrowth to protect the homes of the citizens that paid for the Anointed Ones'
telescope and sabbaticals to quaint university towns in Germany, France and the like...BAD...BAD...VERY BAD!!!
12 posted on 07/06/2002 1:11:15 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Vaguely recall an article about farms somewhere in California. Some legal immigrant went in to farming.

EPA or somebody put up a stink in the area when farmers/home owners were clearing inflammable scrub.

Seems some "species" of mouse (I pretty sure it was mouse) made its home in the tinderbox.

Well the immigrant did the clearing/paid the fine. After the inevitable fire season hit, his property was still
mostly intact. Not so the rest of the people, whose environment the EPA so draconianly protects in their
interest.

13 posted on 07/06/2002 1:25:25 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The worm is slowly turning...

Stop the attacks by the wacko, extreme left-wing, enviro-nazis terrorist's on our Freedoms !!

Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!

Molon Labe !!

14 posted on 07/06/2002 2:36:07 PM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
"the animal is not known to live there now, probably because the forest has been decimated by an insect infestation, according to a Forest Service memo authorizing the work."

15 posted on 07/06/2002 3:22:05 PM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The work, within critical habitat for an endangered squirrel ...

How the hell do they know that a tree squirrel has a low enough population to be endangered? I don't believe a word of it because squirrels live frickin' everywhere!

Good question, and if I remeber correctly, here is the answer. The environmentalists were losing the battle to stop the telescope from being built, until suddenly and conveniently they discovered a new subspecies of squirrel on the mountain, the "Mount Graham red squirrel". The most interesting feature of the Mount Graham red squirrel is that it is genetically indistinguishable from the common squirrel in the rest of the forest. Not even the environmentalists, when confronted at a meeting with different captured squirrels, could tell which was common and which was this new subspecies. The squirrel has nothing to do with scientific classification, it was created on paper to stop the telescope from being built.

16 posted on 07/06/2002 3:33:14 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
These environmental idiots successfully challenged a building development here in San Diego, where we are desperate for housing, and all because of a tiny butterfly. It seems the butterfly was native to this habitat and was "endangered".

My suggestion was to take the butterfly and give it to the San Diego Zoo - where everyone could enjoy it in the butterfly exhibit.

Instead, they have kept homes from being built which were needed. It's so stupid!
17 posted on 07/06/2002 3:58:48 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
The most interesting feature of the Mount Graham red squirrel is that it is genetically indistinguishable from the common squirrel in the rest of the forest.

Insanity. This description, I'm sure is on page 599 of a lengthy junk-science report to the EPA.

18 posted on 07/06/2002 4:21:58 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: madfly
the forest has been decimated by an insect infestation

Thanks, Sierra Clubbers.

19 posted on 07/06/2002 6:32:01 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
bump
20 posted on 07/06/2002 6:38:27 PM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson