Posted on 07/03/2002 6:41:25 AM PDT by FresnoDA
Janet Roehr, who lives across the street from Westerfield in Sabre Springs, said Westerfield typically left the 35-foot motorhome at his house overnight before leaving for a trip.
Roehr said she only saw the 1997 Southwind for a few minutes the afternoon after the girl was discovered to be missing from the neighborhood. She didn't see it again.
Her husband, Mark, testified he did not see the motorhome the day before.
The testimony likely did not help the defense case, which began directly after the midday lunch break. Three witnesses took the stand in the morning before the prosecution rested.
Janet Roehr said she saw the youngest child of Brenda and Damon van Dam chase a ball across the street just two weeks ago.
"Did you see the parents anywhere?" defense attorney Robert Boyce asked.
"No, I didn't," Roehr answered. She said that she had to leave her house and help the boy back across the street.
The van Dams testified earlier in the trial that they kept their children under tight rein, able to play alone along the sidewalk near their house but never across the street.
The defense has portrayed Sabre Springs as a family neighborhood filled with children.
Under cross-examination by Deputy District Attorney Jeff Dusek, both Roehrs said they never saw young children in the defendant's motorhome.
Westerfield, a 50-year-old self-employed design engineer, could be sentenced to death if convicted of kidnapping and murdering the second-grader, who lived down the street from his home.
He also faces misdemeanor possession of child pornography charges.
Westerfield's next-door neighbor, Paul Hung, testified that he saw the defendant's motorhome parked near Westerfield's home about 8:30 a.m. on Feb. 2, the day Danielle turned up missing.
"I saw the motorhome parked on the side (of the house)," Hung said. "No, I didn't see David that morning."
Hung testified that a half-hour later, the motorhome was gone.
That night, Westerfield was not around as searchers combed the area around the van Dam home, Hung testified.
Detective Johnny Keene was recalled to the stand and told Dusek that Westerfield was questioned the morning of Feb. 4 and again that afternoon and night.
In between, the defendant was free to do what he wanted, Keene testified.
Defense attorneys have alleged that Westerfield -- even though he wasn't under arrest -- couldn't leave and hadn't eaten when he spoke to authorities.
The final prosecution witness, Dr. Joy Halverson, of Quest-Gen Forensics in Davis, testified that the mitochondrial DNA found in four of five hair samples could have come from Layla, the van Dam family's dog.
Halverson said she found a complete match in two samples. She also said she found nothing to exclude the canine as a source for the hair.
Two samples with the full match came from Westerfield's motorhome, according to a chart prepared by the prosecution. One was in the hallway carpet, the other on a bathmat.
The evidence gave the prosecution another link between Westerfield and the slain youngster, who was found dead east of El Cajon on Feb. 27.
Last week, another DNA expert, Holly Ernst of UC Davis, said she was unable to get results from the samples that she could reproduce.
Halverson, though, said Layla's DNA sequence was found in 23 of 267 dogs in her database, or one in nearly 12.
Those numbers, though, are where she ran into trouble in cross-examination by defense attorney Steven Feldman.
Halverson admitted a mathematical error when she narrowed the field in her database from 358 dogs to 267. She said she filed an amended report. The chart shown to jurors gave a third set of numbers.
"Is it good science to make a mathematical error three times in the same data set?" Feldman asked.
Halverson called it human error.
Earlier, a volunteer dog handler testified that he sent an e-mail saying he "was bursting with pride" on the day Westerfield was arrested in connection with Danielle's disappearance.
Jim Frazee, who volunteers with the San Diego County Sheriff's Department, sent the e-mail to three friends on Feb. 22 -- 16 days after his dogs examined Westerfield's motorhome at an impound lot on Aero Drive.
Frazee testified last week that one of the dogs, Cielo, gave an alert signal at the door to an exterior storage compartment on the passenger side of the vehicle while searching for the child's remains.
Under cross-examination by Boyce today, Frazee said he did not mention the alert in a report he filed because police investigators asked for the results to remain confidential.
"On Feb. 6, you don't recall telling anyone what the dog found?" Boyce asked.
"I don't recall what I told them," Frazee said.
The defense concentrated on the fact that, with no other report filed, the only evidence of Cielo's alert came from the e-mail after the defendant's arrest.
Boyce quoted Frazee's e-mail, which he said stated: "I wasn't sure, but I thought Cielo was giving his cadaver alert. I thought he may have been doing this just to please me. Today, however, came word of the suspect's arrest and that they found blood in the motorhome."
Frazee said the arrest raised his confidence in Cielo's finding.
Frazee's supervisor, reserve sheriff's Lt. Rosemary Redditt, said she watched Cielo's search of the outside of the motorhome and had no trouble recognizing the dog's alert at the storage door.
Didn't investigators inquire with the neighbors as to if the unrolled hose was common/uncommon?...wasn't one of the red flags because DW couldn't produce Garry's phone #, ohh..he did in fact give it to Keene and Parga..hmmm.....missing girl and you wait 18 days to say you may have gotten a positive hit from your dog??...you didn't talk to Mr/Mrs Rohr about the MH being parked and unlocked??....troubling to say the least.
And what about that shell casing and those pesky unidentified prints..whose missing from your list that would have been in her room and touched her desk Mr/Mrs VD???
Thanks fres!
I had to LOL..the ctv folks thought she was a wonderful witness..she would not let them imply she has sex with Brenda..she "stood up" for herself..a real assertive woman ..
DW may have killed Danielle; and if he did, the prosecutor will be responsible if DW is aquitted. The prosecutor should have waited until the evidence was evaluated in greater detail and held off indicting DW until the facts were better established and evaluated, and the stories of the prosecution witnesses reconciled in order to present a clear picture.
The prosecutor's desire for a boost in the polls by announcing an arrest and indictment in this case for political reasons will bite him in the butt, especially if DW is acquitted. If evidence is discovered, after an aquittal, that proves DW did murder Danielle, the prosecutor's political career is dead.
OK, thanks.
I dont see much mention of that.
Dusek could be in trouble for not providing defense a blowup picture showing DW not sweating as they claimed...he only provided a thumbnail print.(not sure how accurate that info is).
Attorneys and judge are still in closed meeting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
