Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US: Civilians probably not hit by bomb
UPI ^ | July 2, 2002 | By Pamela Hess

Posted on 07/02/2002 3:00:58 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29

WASHINGTON, July 2 (UPI) -- The United States said Tuesday that an errant satellite-guided bomb probably did not kill about 40 civilians in Uruzgan province north of Kandahar early Monday, since the bomb landed on an empty hillside.

Instead, the casualties most likely resulted from an AC-130 gunship attack on Taliban or al Qaida anti-aircraft artillery sites or from anti-aircraft shells falling to the ground, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Peter Pace told reporters at a press conference.

"That hill mass had no people on it, and the air controller on the ground believes that there was no one in that area where it impacted," Pace said.

Afghan officials and area residents said about 40 members of a wedding party were killed Monday and 100 others were wounded, according to news reports.

The Pentagon Tuesday would officially confirm no deaths and only four injuries, one of them serious: four children between the ages of 8 months and 5 years were brought by their father to the U.S. military, which flew them in a medical helicopter back to the military hospital at the Kandahar airbase.

Also Tuesday, a team of U.S. soldiers came under attack by small arms fire on the approximately 15 mile-road between the Kandahar city hospital and the air base. One soldier was slightly injured, said Pentagon spokesman Cmdr. Jeff Davis.

The soldiers did not return fire.

They had been visiting approximately 10 Afghans who checked themselves into the hospital after Monday's bombing incident.

"The purpose of the visit was to ascertain their condition and see what U.S. assistance could be offered to their medical care," Davis said.

The incident began Monday around 2 a.m. local time when a force of as many as 400 U.S. and Afghan soldiers, including two Special Forces units, were conducting reconnaissance 70 miles north of Kandahar in an area believed to be a hideout for Taliban or al Qaida fighters.

U.S. aircraft flying over the area had been targeted with anti-aircraft artillery fire several times over the preceding days, Pace said.

An AC-130 gunship providing air cover to the ground force fired on at least six sites over several miles when it came under attack by ground artillery weapons, Pace said.

It is unclear whether the AC-130 crew observed the fire and reacted in self-defense or if a soldier on the ground directed the attack against the artillery sites.

"If a U.S. military unit is taking fire, they have the absolute right of inherent self-defense," Pace said.

Pace said there was no ground gunfight prior to the bombing.

At the same time, a B-52 bomber launched seven satellite-guided Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs at a cave complex believed occupied by Taliban or al Qaida fighters. One of the seven malfunctioned and fell about 3,000 yards short of the cave, hitting a hilltop.

The forward air controller on the ground that called in the B-52 strike reported the bomb fell on an unpopulated area.

A team of U.S. military and government and Afghan government officials, accompanied by media representatives, have arrived in the area where the casualties occurred.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said local villagers would be interviewed to determine what happened.

"What we do not know is information that will be gained by (talking to) non-U.S. forces," Rumsfeld


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: southasialist; warlist
AA shells falling to the ground killed up to 40 people wounding over a hundred? Sorry this doesn't pass the smell test.

I have to remain open on this one. There have been times when the official government message was not the truth. I reserve judgment.

1 posted on 07/02/2002 3:00:58 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Sorry Afghans, when you play in sh** you get some of it on you. If there was no Al-Qeada in Afghanistan, those 40 "wedding guests" would still be alive.
2 posted on 07/02/2002 3:05:24 PM PDT by mrfixit514
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
You say you are reserving judgement, but cite the Islamic figures of 40 dead and over a hundred wounded. (Yesterday the Islamic figure was in excess of 250 dead, but apparently most of these have been resurrected by the benevolence of Allah) A true resevation of judgement would wait until deaths are confirmed by reliable sources before presuming that such deaths occurred.
3 posted on 07/02/2002 3:09:33 PM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *southasia_list; *war_list
Bump
4 posted on 07/02/2002 3:10:46 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
the Islamic figure was in excess of 250 dead

What is the count now? One finger nicked on the cake knife?

5 posted on 07/02/2002 3:13:30 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
So far, no confirmed civilian deaths.
6 posted on 07/02/2002 3:19:06 PM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Fox News just said 4 INJURED all children. NOT 250 dead. Which "News" organization was reporting that yesterday? I think the WH is a little P.Oed at those reports.
7 posted on 07/02/2002 3:21:19 PM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
BREAKING: "Friendly Fire" U.S. Bomb Kills At Least 250 At Afghan Wedding

MSNBC Breaking Live

Posted on 7/1/02 9:35 AM Pacific by RCW2001

BREAKING: "Friendly Fire" U.S. Bomb Kills At Least 250 At Afghan Wedding

At least 400 injured...searching for wire copy.

8 posted on 07/02/2002 3:29:23 PM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: per loin
You say you are reserving judgement...

That's correct.

Until I hear from reliable sources the official numbers, I will continue to do so. In the last 24 hours, the numbers of the dead/injured have fluctuated wildly, depending on the source quoted.

Hence, the reservation of judgement in any direction on my part.

:*)
9 posted on 07/02/2002 5:09:48 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson