Posted on 07/02/2002 10:53:35 AM PDT by mindprism.com
PLACE: A city street in your town, USA.
TIME: The not too distant future.
FBI: Are you A. Citizen?
CITIZEN: Yes I am.
FBI: Come with us, you're under arrest.
CITIZEN: On what charge?
FBI: We don't have to tell you that.
CITIZEN: I want to call my lawyer.
FBI: We won't let you do that.
CITIZEN: You have to, it's my right!
FBI: You don't have any rights.
CITIZEN: Sez Who?
FBI; Sez the President. He's decided that you are an "enemy combatant" and as such you are not entitled to any Constitutional rights.
CITIZEN: But I haven't done anything.
FBI: The President will be the judge of that. In fact he's already made the decision. Besides, it's not what you've done, it's what we think you were going to do.
CITIZEN: Based on what evidence?
FBI: We can't show you the evidence. It's classified.
CITIZEN: How can I defend myself at my trial if you won't tell me what the evidence against me is?
FBI: You don't get a trial. You're an enemy combatant, remember? We don't even have to charge you with anything. But in about a month, we'll hold a press conference telling everybody what we think you were up to, and that they can all sleep soundly because we've got you safely under lock and key and we intend to keep you there until the war is over.
CITIZEN: What war?
FBI: The War Against Bad Things.
CITIZEN: When will this war be over?
FBI: When we've eliminated all the bad things in the world.
CITIZEN: But that will never happen!
FBI: Now you're getting the idea.
CITIZEN: So let me get this straight. You're arresting me for something I haven't even done yet. You won't tell me what I'm charged with or what evidence you have against me. I don't get to talk to a lawyer. I don't get a trial. I don't have any opportunity to refute the charges or defend myself against them. You're just going to strip me of my Constitutional rights and lock me up for what amounts to a life sentence based on the whim of the President?
FBI: Is this a great country or what? God Bless America!
EBUCK
Lock him up!
EBUCK
I thought the *nation* is responsible for the policies that Washington produces, isn't that how democracy works?
sigh....if you mean the citizens of the nation you will have to report immediately to the re-education camps. A seditious traitor such as yourself is a danger to society. Our wise and supreme leader knows what is best for you.
The good news is you will be fed and clothed and told in which direction to pray to Allah. If you co-operate with our interrogators you may even get a bagle with cream cheese:)
On the other hand if you mean the magazine 'The Nation', they might be advising, but only on matters concerning 'collective thought'. Good guess though;^)
And I don't understand what this question has to do with my comment. I guess this dovetails with my seeing no humor in the original joke.
America is a representive constitutional republic in form not in function. There is barely any restriction on what federal dictates can flow through the commerce clause, and the reality is the inverse of the tenth amendment.
Regardless, the idea of representation in modern government means a legislature depicting the will of the people. The crux of this 'joke' is that it illustrates the opposite of exactly what you are asserting -- that our representative democracy is restrained by principles of law and rights.
Has little to do with Bush and has everything to do with a nation who has forgotten its principles.
Wait until there is another Clinton/Reno and McVeigh to see how you feel holding the 'wrong political views'. See how fun life will be when you have to watch out who you are 'affiliated' with, and with whom you share principles, and 'watch what you say'.
For there will be people 'ever vigilent' for 'people like you'.
Then this will be a real knee-slapper I'm sure.
When ideas are dangerous, only the dangerous will have ideas.
Thinking is man's only basic virtue, from which all others proceed. And his basic vice, the source of all his evils, is that nameless act which all of you practice, but struggle never to admit: the act of blanking out, the willful suspension of one's consciousness, the refusal to think -- not blindness, but the refusal to see; not ignorance, but the refusal to know. It is the act of unfocusing your mind and inducing an inner fog to escape the responsibility of judgment -- on the unstated premise that a thing will not exist if only you refuse to identify it, that A will not be A so long as you do not pronounce the verdict "It is." Non-thinking is an act of annihilation, a wish to negate existence, an attempt to wipe out reality. But existence exists; reality is not wiped out, it will merely wipe out the wiper. By refusing to say "It is," you are refusing to say "I am." By suspending your judgment, you are negating your person. When a man declares: "Who am I to know?" -- he is declaring: "Who am I to live?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.