Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush promotes school vouchers as part of 'compassionate agenda'in Ohio visit
Nando Times/AP ^ | 7/1/02 | staff

Posted on 07/01/2002 9:31:57 AM PDT by LarryLied

President Bush, who last year lost a fight for school vouchers, was touting the idea again Monday following a new Supreme Court ruling upholding such a program here.

Opening a week of travel to states critical to his re-election, Bush brought school choice and an array of domestic initiatives to Cleveland on Monday under his catchall "compassionate agenda" banner. Also on the table: initiatives on home ownership, welfare and a major role for religious charities in the delivery of social services.

Bush's budget includes new school choice options, including a voucher program of sorts. It would offer a $2,500-per-child education tax credit for families whose children attend private schools instead of failing neighborhood public schools. The five-year, $3.5 billion proposal would also cover books, computers, transportation and supplies.

The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision Thursday upheld a program in inner-city Cleveland that gives mostly poor parents a tuition subsidy of up to $2,250 per child at parochial and other nonpublic schools. The court held that the program "is neutral in all respects toward religion."

Bush's trip to Ohio followed a weekend in which he had a colon screening and turned power over briefly to Vice President Dick Cheney. Tuesday, Bush visits Wisconsin, and Thursday it's West Virginia.

Monday's trip was also meant as an outreach effort to minority voters who have viewed Bush with suspicion. Black voters supported Bush's Democratic opponent, Al Gore, by a 9-1 margin in the last presidential election. Bush was addressing what the White House called an "inner-city compassion rally."

Appearing with Bush was Gov. Bob Taft, who is facing re-election this year and, if successful, will be able to boost Bush in 2004 in Ohio - the seventh-largest prize in presidential elections.

Monday was Bush's seventh visit to the state. Tuesday will be his sixth to Wisconsin, which he lost narrowly to Gore. He will again discuss welfare there. Thursday's July Fourth trip will be his fourth to West Virginia, a traditionally Democratic state Bush won in 2000.

Bush was stepping back into the voucher battle after losing a round last year with Congress.

He proposed during his campaign to strip federal funds from the worst-performing schools and to make them available to parents for private education vouchers.

Congress wouldn't go along, and Bush instead signed an education overhaul bill without them. In the new law, public schools where scores failed to improve two years in a row can receive more federal aid, but if scores still failed to improve, low-income students could receive tutoring or transportation to another public school.

Under the Cleveland voucher program, parents may spend the money they receive at private academies, church-run schools or at suburban public schools with better academic credentials. In practice, more than 95 percent of the participating schools are church-affiliated.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: vouchers

1 posted on 07/01/2002 9:31:57 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Bush really shouldnt have signed that atrocity that Killendy sponsored.... How about reaching across they isle and hand them a steaming pile of turd and push the conservative agenda now?
2 posted on 07/01/2002 10:31:04 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Grade-school and high-school funding is mainly handled at the local and state levels. So Congress' failure to endorse school vouncers here is not the last word on this issue. And vouchers and school choice are LONG-term issues. We have won a big battle with this issue in Ohio. Now, perhaps other states will follow their lead. Hopefully mine, Missouri, will see the light... as Kansas City and St. Louis City have some of the worst public schools in the country. The next step in the battle will be results. People will be watching very closely to see what happens with the kids who are using these vouchers. When they do better than their counterparts who stayed in failing public schools, then we can take the battle to the next level - school choice for everyone.
3 posted on 07/01/2002 10:46:30 AM PDT by TheEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision

If this had been a liberal victory, this would, of course, had been reported just as "The Supreme Court's decision."

4 posted on 07/01/2002 11:34:08 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEngineer; summer; Amelia; Howlin; Miss Marple; PhiKapMom; rdb3
We have a huge advantage now. The left likes to keep issues before the courts because it is a very cheap way to make law. Now they have to go to all the state legislatures and fight against vouchers. The NEA, AFT, PFAW, ACLU, ADL, NCJW, AJC and others have vowed to do this.

What conservatives should do is have our representatives in every state sponsor voucher bills. Doesn't cost us a thing to do that. But the left will be forced to scurry all over the nation trying to kill the bills. And once they kill one, we sponsor another. The legal and PR campaign bills for them will be enormous.

The more $$$ they have to spend on this, the less they have to spend on Democrat candidates this fall and beyond.

5 posted on 07/01/2002 1:16:18 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
See #5. A doable tactic?
6 posted on 07/01/2002 1:19:00 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
That's smart politics. The only political differences between you and I is the subject of Israel. I like your thinking here. Sun Tzu said that when there's a fire within the enemy's camp, start one outside the camp. Watching them scurrying around is not only fun, but destructive to them overall.
7 posted on 07/01/2002 1:27:07 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I like that idea. We just need ONE pro-voucher person in each legislative body to do that. And the more we do it, the more they have to spend fighting...
8 posted on 07/01/2002 1:32:36 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
A very doable tactic, and one that will divert NEA funds from political campaigns. The bills can be sponsored in all 50 states and there would be a groundswell of support.

I think you should call your local state chairman and ask him to get on busy.

9 posted on 07/01/2002 1:34:18 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
We may not even disagree as much as it seems on Israel. I want a little more equity in the relationship is all. Israel has a too easy time of it affecting our policies and our public opinion. Making them work for it is good for them and for us.
10 posted on 07/01/2002 1:35:18 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The bills can be sponsored in all 50 states and there would be a groundswell of support.

You or anyone else care to do an activism thread on this? We could list who to contact in all the states. Keeping it bumped to the top would get the attention of our reps and those in the media too.

The last thing we should do is sit back and think we have won a victory. The left knew they would lose this one and have their forces all ready to lobby legislatures all over the nation. Let's give them something to fight.

11 posted on 07/01/2002 1:38:38 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I can't do one today or tomorrow. If nothing is up, I will start one on Wednesday. It will take me some time to assemble phone numbers and such.
12 posted on 07/01/2002 1:42:13 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; 2Trievers
Great...we could make it a matter of state pride. Freepers from which state will be the last to force their reps to introduce a voucher bill?

(we'll give the Yankee states some kind of a handicap to make it fair)

Please ping me when you post!

btw...Florida was the first to have a state wide voucher plan. Now it needs to be expanded.

13 posted on 07/01/2002 1:50:24 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied; Miss Marple
Thanks for the information.

Our State Legislature is done for the year -- 2nd highest paid in the Country and they have already gone home for the year -- worthless comes to mind by and large since the RATS still control both houses here in Oklahoma.

Would think here in Oklahoma my State Rep Thad Balkman or former State Rep Carolyn Coleman would be who to contact. Will send you their contact information by Freep mail. Rep Balkman got the Life license plates approved and signed and also a moment of silence in our schools. Both are Republicans and we hope to take over the House this Fall here in Oklahoma.

This would make a great campaign issue for Republicans across America -- run on school vouchers!
14 posted on 07/01/2002 2:30:01 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smith288
I know, this take Brass. When you hear his rant about education just nod your head and ignore him.
15 posted on 07/01/2002 3:03:32 PM PDT by Scholastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Larry, I think what you said in your post to me makes you sound like a decent political strategist! Also, remember to use humor:




16 posted on 07/01/2002 4:53:22 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I heard on local news tonight parents in Palm Beach Co. had applied for more vouchers than anywhere else.
17 posted on 07/01/2002 5:02:53 PM PDT by not-alone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
"(we'll give the Yankee states some kind of a handicap to make it fair)"

Well, Wisconsin was one of the first and most successful states to try the voucher program. Pretty good for a "Yankee" state, huh?

18 posted on 07/01/2002 5:41:06 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
Liberal Vermont has had vouchers for a century or so. The state also gets over 70% of its energy from nuclear power plants. Typical of liberals, isn't it? Do as we say, not as we do.
19 posted on 07/01/2002 6:03:58 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Larry, I have agreed and disagreed with you in the past, but what does nuclear energy have to do with whether or not school vouchers will be successful in a given state? That is the main question that most Americans seem to be asking at this present time. Americans have always been a very pragmatic people and they are more concerned with whether or not vouchers will actually work, rather than the Constitutional questions that vouchers bring up.

Most school districts are funded directly from state and local property taxes anyway.

20 posted on 07/01/2002 6:07:50 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson