Posted on 06/29/2002 9:28:36 PM PDT by beckett
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Kathleen Kennedy Townsend today named former Naval Academy Superintendent Charles R. Larson as her running mate on the Democratic ticket for Maryland governor.
Townsend announced her choice at a morning press conference in Annapolis at which she called Larson "one of our great leaders." Her selection had remained a closely guarded secret among her top advisers.
Until two weeks ago, Larson was a Republican. He is a close friend of U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.); the two attended the Naval Academy together. Larson changed his voter registration to Democrat on June 11, according to Anne Arundel County voter records.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
A few years back when I still lived in Oregon, I went to a Republican precinct meeting and was told by several others attending that once the Republicans finally got complete control of the Houses of Congress and White House, they anticipated an establishment of a theocracy!
None of them, as it turned out, had voted before and all attended the same Baptist Church. When I told them I was a Roman Catholic and a life-long Republican, Lordy! It was like the Ice Age had returned.
It is unfortunate that religion is being mixed with politics. I've always despised RCs who are liberal Democrats. They mix religion with politics in pseudo socialist-peacenik-Catholic agendas but philosophize away the wholesale murder of the unborn.
I suspect the number of Republicans who are not evangelicals are feeling the heat from those who are.
Fortunately I don't see it happening openly among the Republican leadership in Congress. Does anyone else have information?
There's nothing wrong with mixing the two, it's a matter of how far you take it. The 'theocracy' bit sounds like someone was pulling your leg.
Meanwhile the ranks of those voters who are neither registered Democrat nor Republican have swelled, not only in Oregon, but throughout the country.
I want to clarify what I meant about religion in politics being unfortunate. For me, it is like someone who says, "I'm a Native American", "an Afro-American", or a "Polish American". It creates a delineation between Americans. Though this may give the individual making that statement a feeling of cultural identity, it serves to seperate Americans in general. Religion in politics does that when it is blatant.
There is a dreadful lack of morality in this nation of ours. Religion as the unifying force for honor, morality and decency in our political process is all important. But there are some Christians who hate other Christians. They know who they are and their hate is contributing to our nation's problems.
Rep. Robert Ehrlich, Townsend's likely Republican opponent, is not expected to name his running mate until Monday.
This writer could just as easily have said: "Rep. Robert Ehrlich, is planning to make the announcement of his running mate at a ceremony in Annapolis Monday morning at 10 am." The media have been notified of this event!
However the more extreme omission from this article is the fact that MS Townsend introduced her choice for Lt Gov as " Admiral LAWSON." Ask yourself if this would have been mentioned by the media if any Republican had made such a flub?
I saw a cute bumpersticker the other day it stated "YOU are more qualified than KKT!"
So I always refer to her as Ms Townsend.
Larson Joins Kennedy Townsend's Ticket in Md.
Who is Ms. Townsend???????!!!!!! ;)
Nice try, religious-baiter.
I'm not "Evangelical", and I WILL NOT support RINO'S, or the Gay Agenda-driven Repubs...so where do I fit in your skewed liitle vision of the (R) Party.
I quote Reagan on his leaving the DEMONRAT Party..."I didn't leave the party, they left ME!"
Seems to me folks like yourself, that have a screwed-up vision of what a TRUE Conservative is, are the real problem.
Real Conservatives have been taking it in the shorts for YEARS, being told to support the likes of Chaffee, Jeffords, Snowe, ect...the "I'm not REALLY a (R) crowd" that dominates the media, and is more concerned about their social calendar, and the pork they can bring home to keep the power and prestige they have...rather than advancing a CONSERVATIVE agenda.
That is the true test...Conservatives have held their noses, and gone with "the Conventional Wisdom" MANY times...why won't the "Moderates" or "RINO'S" do it when it comes to advancing a "Conservative" agenda?
I think the answer is apparent in your screed against " some Evangelical Christains" as you put it.
We've TRIED your way...arer you willing to try OURS? (Ours meaning Conservatives interested in doing what's right)
These SOBS always stab us in the back after we've defeated them and their moral relativism in the primaries!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.