Skip to comments.
WHITE HOUSE PREPARING FOR POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT RESIGNATION
Drudge ^
| 6/27/02
| Drudge
Posted on 06/27/2002 7:30:34 AM PDT by frmrda
WHITE HOUSE PREPARING FOR POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT RESIGNATION
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Nothing follows.
1
posted on
06/27/2002 7:30:35 AM PDT
by
frmrda
To: frmrda
That narrows it down, huh?
2
posted on
06/27/2002 7:34:07 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: frmrda
Marvelous....[sarcasm/] If it's one of the conservitives, we're screwed.
3
posted on
06/27/2002 7:34:07 AM PDT
by
Orangedog
To: frmrda
Please God, let it be J.P. Stevens!
To: frmrda
You can make this prediction every year at this time.
5
posted on
06/27/2002 7:36:13 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: frmrda
Who's the oldest SCOTUS Justice? Is it Rhenquist?
6
posted on
06/27/2002 7:36:14 AM PDT
by
Kwilliams
To: frmrda
Two Points
- Well, DUH! They would not be doing their job if they did not always have one or two nominations in the queue. This headline is like saying "Newspaper Preparing for Death of Major Celebrity"
- Good luck to GW in getting a conservative justice confirmed in the Senate. Having as much trouble as he is with little Tommy and federal judges, imagine the anal exam his SCOTUS nominees will face.
7
posted on
06/27/2002 7:36:18 AM PDT
by
Andyman
To: frmrda
???!!!
8
posted on
06/27/2002 7:36:29 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: Andyman; Catspaw; Pokey78
Hey guys, don't kill the messenger, I'm just reporting it. If the resignation is one of the conservatives, Bush will get his way. Except if its O'Conner, who is the swing abortion vote. If its Stevens, or one of the other liberals, then hell is going to break loose.
9
posted on
06/27/2002 7:38:31 AM PDT
by
frmrda
To: frmrda
Ginsburg underwent chemo for colon cancer.
Rehnquist (78) is allegedly ailing and has long been rumored to be considering retirement.
Ditto for O'Connor (72).
Stevens is old (82, and my guess for the one leaving).
If it's Rehnquist, then the WH has to gear up for two fights: one for the new justice, and the other for the Chief Justice.
Politically the timing is actually pretty good news for the R's, as it offers them a pre-election chance to highlight the D's foot-dragging on judicial appointments, and from there to their general obstructionism. Tommy and crew always look bad when that happens.
As for the confirmation fight itself, I would hope that the Bush folks decide to take the bull by the horns and let their nominee speak freely.
10
posted on
06/27/2002 7:38:47 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: frmrda
Several professors at my law school have said that O'Connor probably wants to retire first. We'll see.
11
posted on
06/27/2002 7:39:25 AM PDT
by
mrs9x
To: r9etb
Most likely Rehnquist due to health. Scalia next most likely as he wants more money.
To: frmrda
Don't worry, anyone GWB nominates will be rejected.
13
posted on
06/27/2002 7:40:03 AM PDT
by
Khepera
To: frmrda
My guess is O'Connor.
To: frmrda
If we don't get the senate majority back, we won't get the kind of judges we need. It's that simple.
15
posted on
06/27/2002 7:41:03 AM PDT
by
umgud
To: r9etb
In the case of Rehnquist resigning, here's what the White House should do:
1. Nominate Thomas or Scalia for chief justice. The libs will go nuts, and will focus all their attention on defeating them. Then nominate a conservative to replace Rehnquist. The dems will waste all their political capital against Scalia or Thomas that the new nominee might go under the radar screen!
This is what happened when Rehnquist was nominated as Chief Justice. Scalia was approved by a huge margin because everyone was focusing on Rehnquist.
16
posted on
06/27/2002 7:41:44 AM PDT
by
mrs9x
To: Doctor Stochastic
I wonder how the Pledge flap will play into the inevitable food fight in terms of how far the dems can go to blast a judge for being "conservative".
17
posted on
06/27/2002 7:42:16 AM PDT
by
berned
To: Orangedog
Actually, if we combine this with the Ninth Circuit's opinion on the Pledge of Allegiance, then the timing is perfect.
If a Supreme resigns, at this time, then President Bush could point to the Ninth Circuit opinion as a reason for the need to appoint a strict Contsitutionalist and not another activist/moderate.
If he really had balls he would appoint Robert Bork.
Personally I would love to see that, but no way that would happen.
To: berned
...how far the dems can go to blast a judge for being "conservative".
Nice thought - this could be great timing, after all!
Esp. w/ the focus on Senate foot-dragging on Judicial nominees, already.
Could this be a fore-shadowing of great and Godly things to transpire this November?
19
posted on
06/27/2002 7:50:53 AM PDT
by
Psalm 73
To: frmrda
President Bush's list should start with only his first choice for the job as any compromise nominee will get shot down anyway. He should start with his choice, then if he or she is denied, run Bork at them again. Let even the morons see that the Dems are only playing political games and don't care about the country.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson