Skip to comments.
Leahy: Bush seeks agency 'above the law'
Reuters / CNN ^
Posted on 06/26/2002 3:02:57 PM PDT by RCW2001
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:00:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) --U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy charged Wednesday that the Bush administration was effectively asking Congress to put its proposed department to combat terrorism "above the law."
Leahy told Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge that to win swift congressional approval of the department -- designed to guard against another September 11-like attack -- the administration must revise or drop provisions that would exempt the operation from a number of legal requirements.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bush; homelandsecurity; leahy; ridge
1
posted on
06/26/2002 3:02:57 PM PDT
by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
Grassley seems like one of the few reasonible republicans we got. Wish to hades they'd give him Lotts' job.
2
posted on
06/26/2002 3:10:54 PM PDT
by
steve50
To: RCW2001
I noticed Senator Leahy didn't have a problem putting Bill Clinton "above the law."
To: RCW2001
"LEAKY LEAHY" -- Castro Butt-Boy and American Traitor
4
posted on
06/26/2002 3:38:56 PM PDT
by
quark
To: RCW2001
This is great news. Every minute that Leahy, Conyers, these committees, et al., worry about this proposal is one less minute they worry about their own agendas.
5
posted on
06/26/2002 3:46:57 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
And just last year, the National Commission on Terrorism chaired by former Reagan counterterrorism head Paul Bremer issued a report with the eerily foreboding image of the Twin Towers on its cover. A bipartisan effort led by Jon Kyl and Dianne Feinstein was made to attach the recommendations of the panel to an intelligence authorization bill. But Sen. Patrick Leahy feared a threat to "civil liberties" and torpedoed the effort. After the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole, Kyl and Feinstein tried yet again. This time, Leahy was content with emaciating the proposals instead of defeating them outright. The weakened proposals died as the House realized "it wasn't worth taking up." President Clinton certainly could have encouraged Sen. Leahy to drop his opposition, but he didn't.Link, Nov. 2001, National Review.
To: RCW2001
That's it, Leahy. Keep on digging that hole ... deeper and deeper ....
7
posted on
06/26/2002 4:07:56 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: RCW2001
And may their first arrest for leaking classified info be Leahy's sorry a$$.
8
posted on
06/26/2002 4:20:28 PM PDT
by
SCHROLL
To: RCW2001
Gov. agencies are already above getting fired. Who's complaining about that.
9
posted on
06/26/2002 4:53:22 PM PDT
by
Octavius
To: RCW2001
Conyers really means the governments history of leakiness!
To: RCW2001
Leahy the Leak. Rings of patriotism, doesn't it?
To: FryingPan101
Let's get all their names correctly: Patrick binLeahy, Dickie binGephart, Tommy binDaschole, Teddy binKennedy, Hillary binClinton, etc. etc.......
12
posted on
06/26/2002 7:18:37 PM PDT
by
linton59
To: steve50
"Above the law! How about his improperly holding up the President's judicial appointments. Talk about disdain for the rule of law.
Typical sleazy democrat party liar.
To: RCW2001
So? DemoRATS always think they are above the law, ala Clinton, so what is the big deal huh?
To: RCW2001
Leahey is a moron for lack of a better word and if the 9th circuit is the model judciary for Leahey, et.al then we better watch out because they will destroy so many rights that would make any cabinet deptartment that he is concerend about look like child's play.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson