Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush signs bill extending benefits to homosexual couples
Washington Post ^ | June 26, 2002 | Mike Allen

Posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:41 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

President Bush has signed a bill allowing death benefits to be paid to the domestic partners of firefighters and police officers who die in the line of duty, permanently extending a federal death benefit to same-sex couples for the first time.

The new law allows a $250,000 federal benefit for survivors of public safety officers to be paid to any beneficiary listed on the victim's life insurance policy. The money has been available only to spouses, children and parents.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushhomosexuals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2002 12:19:41 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Disappointing... to put it mildly.
2 posted on 06/26/2002 12:22:43 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
The new law allows a $250,000 federal benefit for survivors of public safety officers to be paid to any beneficiary listed on the victim's life insurance policy

It indirectly provides benefits to gay partners, but not explicitly.

3 posted on 06/26/2002 12:25:35 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Another reason why I didn't vote for Bush.
4 posted on 06/26/2002 12:26:24 PM PDT by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jgrubbs
I wish hadn't. No President has advanced the homosexual agenda more than Bush. He's doing things Clinton couldn't have gotten away with.

But, despite this and advancing a left-wing agenda on issue after issue, 54% of Freepers think he is doing a good or excellent job. Amazing.

5 posted on 06/26/2002 12:29:09 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Perhaps Bush's action has a connection with the 9th ruling on outlawing "under God" in the Pledge of Allegience. The ruling is God's way of telling us this nation has crossed the line.
6 posted on 06/26/2002 12:31:08 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
I disagree with this action on several levels.
7 posted on 06/26/2002 12:33:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
He can spend it faster than Ole Bubba. But he's got a (R) after his name so he must be good, huh????????
8 posted on 06/26/2002 12:55:00 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
The ruling is God's way of telling us this nation has crossed the line.

Drivel.
"The flat tire I got was God's way of telling me..."
"'Touched by an Angel' being cancelled is God's punishment for..."

If there's anything you Christians are good for, it's certainly a sardonic chuckle from time to time.
9 posted on 06/26/2002 1:01:53 PM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Constitution Party BUMP!!


10 posted on 06/26/2002 1:02:19 PM PDT by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Neckbone
I prayed to God for more touching on "Touched By An Angel" and for an angel to come to my house and touch me. Nothing happened. Been an atheist ever since.
11 posted on 06/26/2002 1:08:53 PM PDT by SteamshipTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jgrubbs
>>Another reason why I didn't vote for Bush

Another reason I won't vote for him next time...

12 posted on 06/26/2002 1:23:16 PM PDT by freeper12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Perhaps all laws in this country should not be federalized, hmm?
13 posted on 06/26/2002 1:24:00 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Can somebody tell me what this is??? "The new law allows a $250,000 federal benefit for survivors of public safety officers " - the $250,000 FEDERAL BENEFIT - what is this, please? Public Safety Officers - what does this mean? Who does this include? And is this a taxpayer paid benefit to survivors of Public Safety Officers????? If so, what benefit goes to survivors of those in our military killed in action? And, does this include people like FEMA, IRS, CUSTOMS Agents, etc????? And is this for death on the job or is it just when these people die - they get this benefit....no matter when the death happens or what the cause? There are a lot more questions to me then just who gets the money!!!!
14 posted on 06/26/2002 1:29:47 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SteamshipTime
Heh, better to be touched by an angel than to be touched by Della Reeves!
15 posted on 06/26/2002 1:29:49 PM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
I'm playing devil's advocate here.

1. The fairest thing would be that no one gets any benefits (married, single, gay, strait) unless he/she pays for it.

2. Next, we are a diverse nation (I know "diverse" has been really abused.) One of the main objection to gay benefits is a religious one, such as the Bible condemns the act, etc. But we tolerate diverse religions and philosophies, even if we strongly disagree. I see Bush is a president of all of us. A good objection is who pays for the benefits. (Go back to point 1.)

Just throwing out a few ideas... Now, let me have it.

16 posted on 06/26/2002 1:37:41 PM PDT by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Wonder how long it will be before he gives his approval to 'gay' marriages?
Bet the Cheney Family like this decision.
17 posted on 06/26/2002 1:41:49 PM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEWwoman
Let you have it? I agree with you! Well said!
18 posted on 06/26/2002 1:42:41 PM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Those are excellent questions for which I have no answers.
19 posted on 06/26/2002 1:51:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Well - perhaps someone else does. It would be nice to find out.
20 posted on 06/26/2002 2:00:40 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson