Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Innocent Plea Entered for Moussaoui
AP via Yahoo! News ^ | Tue Jun 25, 5:16 PM ET | DAVID PACE

Posted on 06/25/2002 2:35:50 PM PDT by twntaipan

Innocent Plea Entered for Moussaoui Tue Jun 25, 5:16 PM ET By DAVID PACE, Associated Press Writer

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) - A federal judge refused Tuesday to change the site of Zacarias Moussaoui's trial and entered a plea of innocent on his behalf during a volatile hearing for the only man charged in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks.

Photos

AP Photo Slideshows

Reuters Zacarias Moussaoui Audio/Video Judge Enters Plea for Moussaoui (AP)

Throughout his arraignment a short distance from the Pentagon ( news - web sites), Moussaoui clashed with U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema over his legal rights.

"I have no plea. I will plead no contest. I have nothing to say to the United States. That's all," he declared.

Brinkema interrupted Moussaoui, who was flanked by U.S. marshals as he stood before the judge, and told him a plea of no contest — nolo contendere — "may result in an almost certain finding of guilt." She told Moussaoui his position was inconsistent with his previous requests, and at one point said, "You don't control the courtroom. I do."

The judge instructed court-appointed attorney Alan Yamamoto to write Moussaoui a letter explaining the consequences of a no-contest plea. Toward the end of the arraignment, Brinkema told him, "Mr. Moussaoui, you are not an attorney, you do not understand the nuances of the legal system."

After Moussaoui repeatedly tried to enter a no-contest plea, a clearly exasperated Brinkema said, "It strikes this court that you are the only one other than the prosecution who is really trying to convict you."

"I do not accept this plea of not guilty," he said.

The 34-year-old Moussaoui, who is of Moroccan descent, is charged with conspiring to help the 19 hijackers and Osama bin Laden ( news - web sites)'s terrorist network plot the September attacks on New York and Washington. He faces six conspiracy charges, including four that carry the death penalty.

Moussaoui accused the judge of interfering with his defense by refusing to let a Muslim lawyer from Houston, Charles Freeman, represent him, and by not letting him make phone calls from jail. "I have no means to defend myself," he protested.

Freeman was in the courtroom, but Brinkema refused to let him sit at the defense table with Moussaoui because he is not registered to practice law in Virginia and has not formally asked to enter the case as Moussaoui's attorney. Freeman declined to comment afterward.

The judge granted Moussaoui's request earlier this month to act as his own lawyer.

Yamamoto told reporters he didn't understand why Moussaoui kept trying to say he wanted to plead no contest.

"He insists he wants to put on a defense, wants access to information ... so a no-lo plea would prevent a trial," Yamamoto said. "So, it appears to me he just didn't understand what a nolo contendere plea meant."

Moussaoui had refused to enter a plea at his initial arraignment in January, saying he was taking that stance "in the name of Allah." Tuesday was the first time he had tried to use the no contest plea.

When Brinkema tried to instruct him Tuesday on the implications of his entering a no contest plea, he shot back, "Since the beginning, you are interfering with my right to represent myself."

In turning down Moussaoui's plea for a change of venue, Brinkema rejected his claim that he could not obtain an impartial jury from northern Virginia near the Pentagon. She also dismissed his argument that the jury pool would be over-represented with U.S. government employees.

Moussaoui had been called to court for arraignment on a slightly revised federal indictment that prosecutors filed last week. In one substantive change, they deleted allegations that he had inquired about crop-dusting planes and had information about them in his computer.

He asked the judge to withdraw two motions made by his court-appointed attorneys. In their place, he said, he wanted the FBI ( news - web sites) director "to certify under the threat of perjury" that Moussaoui was not under surveillance by U.S. authorities since his arrival in America.

Moussaoui has maintained he had nothing to do with the Sept. 11 hijackers and the government knows it because federal authorities had kept him under surveillance since British authorities raided his London residence several years ago.

However, British officials have said his residence in London's rough Brixton neighborhood was never raided until anti-terrorism police went in shortly after Sept. 11.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Spencer told Brinkema that prosecutors are not aware of any surveillance of Moussaoui and do not believe he is entitled to the certification he demanded.

Brinkema did not rule on that request, but she did grant a government motion, over Moussaoui's objections, to deny him the addresses of government witnesses and potential jurors. Without those addresses, Moussaoui argued, prosecutors could bring people into court "to testify to what the U.S. government wants" and he would have no way to determine who the witnesses really are.

As the judge adjourned the proceeding and everyone in the courtroom stood as she left, Moussaoui sat down at the defense table and raised his hands above his head.

Yamamoto told reporters he didn't know what Brinkema could do to satisfy Moussaoui.

"I'm not sure she can do much more than she has done," he said. "He's not going to get access to phones. He's not going to get access to classified material and he's going to have limited ability to investigate unless he speaks with somebody to have an investigator to go out there and look for what he wants."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; islam; moussaoui; muslim; pentagon; radical; terrorism; terrorist; wtc
He argued with the judge to plead "No Contest", which the judge said is as good as pleading guilty.
1 posted on 06/25/2002 2:35:51 PM PDT by twntaipan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
"No Contest" plea basically means you are not contesting the charges against you. It is not the same as pleading guilty, but it's close...(I am not a lawyer, but there are some freepers who are)
2 posted on 06/25/2002 2:41:11 PM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
Unless I'm missing some legal understanding, this is a good thing. If he sets a standard for the other monsters to follow it will expedite future trials and give them less publicity.
3 posted on 06/25/2002 2:54:14 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
Either this guy is extremely smart or extremely stupid. I have the sneaking suspicion that it is the former.

Heard it here first: I think this trial is not going to be the slam-dunk the government is making it out to be. I wouldn't be shocked at all if a not guilty verdict is returned.
4 posted on 06/25/2002 2:58:01 PM PDT by Viva Le Dissention
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
The only difference between No Contest and Guilty is that No Contest cannot be used as evidence in civil proceedings, while Guilty can.

This makes little difference, of course, with charges such as those facing Mr Moussaoui.

D

5 posted on 06/25/2002 3:02:34 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Viva Le Dissention
I agree with you. I don't think that he's guilty. I haven't seen any evidence against him yet however. But I have read the transcripts from other hearings and this man is not stupid and appears to believe he is innocent. He's not playing the cards of a guilty man.
6 posted on 06/25/2002 5:05:24 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
The newspaper report that Moussaoui wanted to enter "no plea" - not Nolo Contendere but simply to say absolutely nothing, not even denying guilt. (Evidently at one point he did mention a Nolo plea, but amid some comments that indicate that he really didn't understand its meaning, because he also wanted a jury trial). Some of the Montana Freemen types think this stunt of refusing to plea prevents a court from proceeding against them; they are Wrong. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 11(a), perpetuating a federal practice that goes back to about 1790, says that if the defendant refuses to plead then the judge will enter a Not Guilty plea for him and the case will proceed normally.
7 posted on 06/26/2002 11:54:57 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson