Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

30 Years Later, Watergate Memories Endure, Scandal's Lesson: Don't Take Presidents At Their Word
Hearst Newspapers ^ | June 18 2002 | Helen Thomas

Posted on 06/23/2002 4:51:22 PM PDT by bradactor

30 Years Later, Watergate Memories Endure Scandal's Lesson: Don't Take Presidents At Their Word

POSTED: 4:21 p.m. EDT June 18, 2002 UPDATED: 6:19 p.m. EDT June 18, 2002

WASHINGTON -- It happened 30 years ago, but the memory of the Watergate scandal lives on.

It all began on the night of June 17, 1972, when President Richard Nixon's Republican operatives broke into the Democratic national headquarters at the Watergate complex.

Their action led to one of the worst scandals in the American presidency, with Nixon lying and trying to use the FBI and CIA in his elaborate cover-up. It also led to his forced resignation, the first in U.S. history, and it changed forever the way the public views the White House and government generally.

It was a defining moment, a wake-up call, for journalists. Never again would they take a president's word at face value.

As a reporter at the White House, I am well aware that the overall trust in government that was largely evident in the pre-Watergate days has not been restored. There is much more skepticism today, not only from journalists but also from the American people, who still desperately want to believe in their leaders. That is the sad legacy of the Watergate scandal.

In 1977, three years after he was pardoned, Nixon gave a series of interviews to British broadcast journalist David Frost. They contained many revelations and many insights into the workings of Nixon's mind during the Watergate crisis.

Now Frost is back with highlights of the famous interviews and some never-before-seen outtakes -- scenes from the cutting-room floor. The footage will begin airing Monday on the Discovery Civilization Channel in its new series called "In Their Own Words: Nixon."

At a reception here Thursday night previewing the program, Frost recalled some of small talk that Nixon, not known for his ease and comfort in such situations, tried to make before the formal interviews 25 years ago.

As an example of Nixon's awkwardness, Frost said Nixon asked him if he was being paid well. When Frost assured him he was, Nixon, apparently referring to some tax problems he was having, cautioned: "Well, make sure you pay your taxes."

During their chat, Frost said he brought up an article in that day's paper about then Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, and Nixon said: "Oh, I wouldn't want to be a Russian leader. They never know when they are being taped." It was, of course, Nixon's taped conversations in the Oval Office that revealed his direct role in the cover-up.

Frost recalled that he introduced Nixon to his girlfriend and told him that she lived in Monte Carlo. "Marry that girl; she lives tax-free," Nixon said.

Frost noted that Nixon, who he said was trying to be "one of the boys" with me, asked at one point, "Did you do any fornicating this weekend?" Frost was surprised by Nixon's use of that word and politely declined to discuss his private life.

He described Nixon as a "sad man who wanted to be great and yet was destined never to be great."

The interviews and outtakes are powerful in bringing back the high drama as well as the nation's agony during that era.

In an opening scene, Nixon's press secretary, Ronald Ziegler, calls the break-in at the Democratic National Committee "a third-rate burglary."

But the burglary led the press and congressional investigators to uncover all sorts of illicit activities by the Nixon aides, including wiretapping, letter-opening and intimidation.

In the interviews Frost asked Nixon to go further than his admission of making "mistakes." The former president replied that he did not feel "I had consciously engaged in" or approved of the illegal activities. "I made mistakes, horrendous mistakes that were not worthy of a president," Nixon said. But he added that when he resigned, "people didn't think it was enough to admit mistakes . . . The people wanted more. They wanted me to get down and grovel on the floor. No, never. I don't believe I should."

Yet he added, "I don't go with the idea that what brought me down was a coup or a conspiracy. I brought myself down."

As for the journalists who led the charge in the Watergate investigation, Nixon acknowledged, "They stuck it in, and I guess if I had been in that position, I would have done the same thing."

In the 28 hours of interviews, Frost elicited Nixon's admission that he had "let the people down" and that it was a burden he would carry all his life.

As for the tapes of his Oval Office conversations, Nixon said he never thought they would "come out." He added if he had thought the tapes would reveal criminal behavior, "I sure as the dickens would have destroyed them."

Unanswered questions about the scandal remain to this day. First, no one has ever fully explained the reason for the break-in. Despite growing anxiety about the Vietnam War, Nixon's standing in 1972 showed he could easily have trounced his Democratic rival, George McGovern. So the Republicans didn't need the illegal activities.

Another question: Who is Deep Throat, the mysterious source who confirmed leads that the Washington Post's Bob Woodward developed? Woodward has said many times that only when the source dies will his name be revealed.

Certainly, there is no joy in watching a president fall from grace. I have always felt that Nixon was a tragic figure, someone who would fit into a Shakespearean or Greek tragedy even though he did not have the nobility that the epic figures had.

Nixon, because of his own excesses and his own demons of hatred, destroyed himself. His dark side always prevailed. Copyright 2002 by Hearst Newspapers. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: helenthomas; nixon; watergate
After listening to G. Gordon Liddy Friday on a local conservative talk radio show here in town, I realize now, according to him, that Watergate was the usual democrat ploy-"All About Sex." It seems Dean was going after the democrats because of a connection with a Call Girl ring in a nearby hotel or somewhere like that. I can't remember the place at the moment. Dean's wife was close to the madam of this ring. Nixon was informed after the fact. Dean was the real culprit behind this. Again, democrats and sex scandal seem to go hand in hand. Brad
1 posted on 06/23/2002 4:51:22 PM PDT by bradactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bradactor
There is much more skepticism today, not only from journalists but also from the American people, who still desperately want to believe in their leaders.

That skepticism seems to apply only to Republican presidents. I recall a Democrat in recent times who demonstrated an equal disregard for the sanctity of his office, yet he was never set upon by the media wolves like Richard Nixon was. In fact, the very same newspaper tyrants that persecuted Nixon gave scant mention to the scandals of the liberal president.

Apparently the "skepticism" this journalist feels is highly selective.

2 posted on 06/23/2002 5:03:58 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bradactor
30 Years Later, Watergate Memories Endure
3 posted on 06/23/2002 5:16:46 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bradactor
I'm sure Helen takes everything Bubba says as the gospel. Shouldn't she be in a nursing home?
4 posted on 06/23/2002 5:26:45 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
According to Ann Coulter, Nixon would think about things and get in trouble while Clinton would succeed in doing things and get away with it. Perfect example, the targeted IRS audits of political enemies. Nixon got in trouble for considering them. Clinton got away with having them.
5 posted on 06/23/2002 5:45:04 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
I'm afraid that Watergate has not been on my mind at all. Perhaps Helen could refresh my memory. Was it about an intern having some sort of sex with a president and then he suborned perjury, perjured himself, harrassed enemies with the IRS, destroyed records, stole FBI files. Wait a minute, wasn't Charles Colson put in prison for 6 months for abusing raw FBI files?

Wrong president.

6 posted on 06/23/2002 5:45:59 PM PDT by Thebaddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
No, silly. Nixon was the one who sold nuclear arms secrets to the Chinese. No. Wait a minute. That was the other guy too.
7 posted on 06/23/2002 5:51:52 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: bradactor
WASHINGTON -- It happened 30 years ago, but the memory of the Watergate scandal lives on.

How can we? The liberal media wont let us forget.

"I don't recall" - Bill Clinton....271 times in testimony about Paula jones

"I don't recall" - Hillary Clinton....50 times...in a 42 paragraph sworn statement.

9 posted on 06/23/2002 6:01:45 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bradactor
Never again would [journalists] take a president's word at face value.

You don't say, Helen, you dessicated old bag of a bag lady. I seem to recall that you had no trouble taking one president's word... and since one subject where Helen was one of the few who believed the guy was some bimbo named Monica, "face value" takes on a whole other meaning.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

10 posted on 06/23/2002 7:25:25 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michellcraig
"Watergate was nothing. Absolutely nothing." There was no break in? There was but Nixon didn't try to cover it up? He did, but that's not bad, on the contrary you wish every President would do the same?
11 posted on 06/24/2002 4:39:04 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson