Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N. Chief Seeks to Turn Aside U.S. Threat to Pull Out of Peacekeeping Operations
AP Breaking News/ Tampa Bay Online ^ | June 21, 2002 | Edith M. Lederer

Posted on 06/21/2002 7:49:39 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The U.N. Security Council approved a brief extension of U.N. peacekeeping operations in Bosnia on Friday, giving diplomats time to tackle a demand to exempt Americans from prosecution by the world's first permanent war crimes tribunal.

The United States has threatened to end its participation in U.N. peacekeeping operations if the council does not grant Americans who take part immunity from arrest and prosecution by the International Criminal Court, which becomes a reality July 1.

The council had been expected to extend the U.N. civilian police mission in Bosnia and the authorization for the NATO-led peacekeeping force in the Balkan nation until Dec. 31. But the United States introduced an amendment Wednesday barring any personnel from either mission from being handed over to an international tribunal.

Facing a possible U.S. veto if the amendment on immunity wasn't included, the council decided to set the Bosnian resolution aside. Instead, it voted unanimously to extend the Bosnian missions until June 30, giving diplomats nine more days to try to find a solution.

The U.S. demand has put the council in a tough spot because the International Criminal Court enjoys wide support among its 15 members. Six have ratified the Rome treaty establishing the court, six others have signed and plan to ratify, and even China, which hasn't signed the treaty, backs it.

The court's supporters view the U.S. amendment as an attempt to undermine the letter and the spirit of its operation.

President Clinton signed the treaty to create the International Criminal Court, but it was never ratified by the Senate and last month the Bush administration announced it wants nothing to do with the tribunal.

The United States objects to the idea that Americans could be subject to the jurisdiction of the court if a crime is committed in a country that has ratified the treaty - even if the United States is not a party.

The government says that could leave U.S. troops and citizens vulnerable to frivolous or politically motivated prosecutions, and that other countries could use it to try American soldiers for war crimes.

Supporters contend the treaty has safeguards against this. The court will step in only when countries are unwilling or unable to dispense justice themselves for the most serious crimes committed by individuals: genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte said Friday the short extension would give members time to discuss the immunity issue.

"I think that what we've got to try to do is separate the issue of divergent points of view about the court and try to solve the practical problem at hand," he said.

"The fact that we have different points of view about the court is a given. But now, how do we deal with that fact with regard to the practical issue of continuation of that mission in Bosnia? ... I'm pretty confident we'll be able to work something out," Negroponte said.

Deputy ambassador Richard Williamson said some countries had made suggestions "and we have been in discussions with our colleagues here as well as in the Capitol."

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Friday the United States should be exempt to avoid "political harassment that can take place unfairly, particularly when ... you're fighting the global war on terror and ... the terrorist training books are encouraging people to make those kinds of charges and allegations."

AP-ES-06-21-02 2118EDT

This story can be found at: http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAA245TQ2D.html



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nwo; ofpeacekeeping; operations; seeks; topullout; toturnaside; unchief; unlist; usthreat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2002 7:49:40 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; backhoe; RippleFire; madfly; seamole; *UN_List; *"NWO"; brat; EODGUY; JMJ333; Jeff Head; ...

2 posted on 06/21/2002 7:51:32 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; ~Kim4VRWC's~; MeeknMing; lowbridge; RightOnline

3 posted on 06/21/2002 7:56:21 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
The UN Security Council, huh? The one chaired by Syria--haven and nesting ground of terrorists?!!!! What an absolute joke. But I'm not laughing.
4 posted on 06/21/2002 8:00:33 PM PDT by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I have no doubt they will find a comprise. Unbelievable.
5 posted on 06/21/2002 8:03:39 PM PDT by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: niki
Yes I feel this as well and the 'compromise' will compromise our military and constituition.
6 posted on 06/21/2002 8:06:24 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I applaud the US saying NO. However...saying no and still giving money to the UN has no effect. Way past time to back up words with action....the action needs simply start by quitting funding the UN and other groups that hate America.
7 posted on 06/21/2002 8:07:40 PM PDT by JustSayNoNWO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
particularly when ... you're fighting the global war on terror and ... the terrorist training books are encouraging people to make those kinds of charges and allegations."

Exactly right, as is being demonstrated by the Hague 'Tribunal' against Milosevic.

8 posted on 06/21/2002 8:11:41 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
It's (long past) time to tell the U.N. to go to H*ll.
9 posted on 06/21/2002 8:13:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate

10 posted on 06/21/2002 8:22:37 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
GET THE US OUT OF THE UN AND THE UN OUT OF THE US.
11 posted on 06/21/2002 8:42:08 PM PDT by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pushi; BenLurkin

AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO THE UNITED NATIONS!


12 posted on 06/21/2002 8:43:43 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Carolina
The UN Security Council Presidency is rotational- it remains in Syria's hands until July, at which point the United Kingdom becomes President-o-the-month. The US takes over the presidency in August, followed by Bulgaria in September...then Camaroon...

The interesting thing is the US and Britain as a pair hold consecutive presidencies, maybe giving us a two month period where we won't hear much whining.

UN Security Council

The whole council is about as functional as udders on a bull.

13 posted on 06/21/2002 9:32:29 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: piasa
"The whole council is about as functional as udders on a bull"

The UN was a good idea gone bad.It must be discarded for the good of all humanity.

14 posted on 06/21/2002 9:58:01 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Why oh why do our leaders give this corrupt, evil outfit any credence? Please email the WhiteHouse president@whitehouse.gov and insist we leave the UN and cease to support them with our hard earned tax dollars.
15 posted on 06/22/2002 12:02:27 AM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brat


16 posted on 06/22/2002 5:05:16 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoNWO

17 posted on 06/22/2002 5:06:13 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
LOL!




18 posted on 06/22/2002 5:08:55 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
ditto bump
19 posted on 06/22/2002 8:12:12 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
LOL! My thoughts exactly!
20 posted on 06/22/2002 8:17:33 AM PDT by 4America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson