and she's right.
Obviously you haven't been paying attention to our Miss Marple. She gets her licks in occasionally, when necessary, it just hasn't been very necessary because she and I and most others are not looking for philosophical purity, we're looking for honesty and integrity which GWB has in spades! But I agree with her 100%! Just the fact that this supposed leak is so hush hush, made me immediately suspicious! Folks in the Bush White House are VERY loyal, out of respect for their boss. That's why you HAVEN'T seen any leaking going on from the White House. Plenty has been going on down the Avenue at the Capitol, though.
Many folks here on FR would love nothing more than to see x42 and #97 in orange jumpsuits, but I doubt it will ever happen. There have been too many ready to cover up for those two because of their hatred of conservatives in general and Republicans in particular, or because they had quietly received word that they shouldn't say anything if they want to continue in their present positions. Then you have to consider that folks in the media think x42 is the greatest thing since sliced bread so they'll carry the water for him EVERY TIME!
There has been a judgement somewhere in the Justice Dept. that there would not be enough evidence THAT WOULD CONVINCE A JURY IN DC of the guilt of the Clintons. Remember, bringing a case before a jury is not enough, you have to depend on 12 people who couldn't get out of jury duty to understand your case and vote for conviction. Do you HONESTLY see that happening? I don't, so why spin our wheels and waste our time on it. If the weenies in the Senate didn't see fit to convict him, why would 12 folks in DC?
I believe the President and the Justice Dept. have more important things to take care of right now, and that pair of lying toon scumbags don't even need to be on their radar!
I think that if Osma bin Laden told you personally that GW Bush is a bad man you would readily agree and thank him for pointing this out to you.
This nonsense isn't 'criticism', it's slander from anonymous 'sources' and you should be honest enough to recognize it as what it is, not use it to bash the President you love to hate but resisting that temptation would obviously be too much to ask. The anti-Bush brigades will never let a good piece of slander go unused and truth isn't useful so no need to consider it.
Those who disagree with President Bush on policy or other issues should stick the those matters of fact when bashing the man instead of jumping on slanderous allegations from anonymous sources, then equating Bush supporters with Clintonites who supported illegality and more in the White House for eight years. Your credibily is lost when you play that dishonest game.