Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Memo to Aspiring Politicians
LFET ^ | George F. Smith

Posted on 06/20/2002 9:10:18 AM PDT by Sir Gawain

A Memo to Aspiring Politicians

by George F. Smith


If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal. — Emma Goldman

So you want to be a politician? Do you have what it takes?

American politicians need to understand the rules of the game if they are to retain office. It must be a game to them (you) — they (you) could not seriously want their (your) fellow citizens to live under a leviathan of red tape, taxation, waste, and corruption while criminally neglecting the one function they're (you're) responsible for.

But since they're committed to playing politics, this is what they (meaning you, dummy) need to remember: money. They'll need it to stay in office. They get it by selling their services. Through committee memberships, they make their influence known, meet with relevant lobbyists, and collect payment in exchange for promises. The donations fund propaganda campaigns to get re-elected, following which they pay off their debts and continue the cycle of influence-peddling.

It cannot be overstressed: In a political system where legislation is bought and sold, money rules. Ideological issues are after-the-fact rationalizations. Example: If certain industries line politicians' pockets, tariffs or import restrictions are necessary to protect American jobs and to help those industries "adjust" to changing conditions. If those same industries happen to misplace their checkbooks, perhaps free trade is the right way to go. It's that simple.

Defending the Constitution, which politicians pledge to do, will not get them re-elected. Most of their constituents have barely heard of the Constitution. So what if it occupies the top box of the federal government's organization chart, as published by the Office of the Federal Register? Elected officials should keep a copy of the chart in their offices and plaster a $5 dollar bill in place of the "Constitution" box, as a tribute to the founder of our modern system. It's not as if the Constitution were some king of old who could make heads roll for gross insubordination.

Politicians should be concerned about the real world and the future — as it extends to the next election. They must be practical people — it's a matter of survival. Theories are for academics and other idlers. The people who count are the people who can help politicians get ahead.

In politics, to be is to be perceived. To be successful, is to be perceived as effective. No one's going to give money to a pol who can't turn the powers of government in the donor's favor. Being perceived as effective means being surrounded by malevolent enemies who are capable of stopping a politician's good intentions. Practical politicians are never without scapegoats.

Since the snowball politicians have packed voters in is rolling downhill at breathtaking speed, they should occasionally issue assurances that their activity is necessary to preserve a heritage of freedom and maintain world peace. Here's the argument in raw form:

"Our founders thought it practical to risk their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to fight the world's most powerful military force. It was obviously practical — how else could George Washington have been elected president, if not by the political trick of defeating the British?

"After winning independence in 1781, our founders decided we had fought the war for something called man's rights. This, of course, was the precursor to the more enlightened concept of what is today known as group rights. As the more sophisticated among us know, a bunch of pols from the thirteen colonies got together after the war and wrote the Declaration of Independence and dated it 1776, so future historians and schoolkids would know they fought for liberty. They spelled out what they meant by liberty in the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution vested sovereignty in a strong central government to which the people owe their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor.

"Unfortunately, in the early years of our democracy, certain recalcitrants prevented the government from operating the way it should. They fostered dangerous notions of the U.S. as a republic with a limited government and something called states' rights. Then in 1860, a Martyr came along and saved us, and we've been on the path of righteous freedom ever since.

"That our path has been consistent with our founders' ideals is evidenced by our progressive income tax, virtual abolition of the right of inheritance, establishment of a central bank, and free taxpayer-funded education regulated by the state. In an act of unintended flattery, Marx and Engels stole these ideas from our founders and incorporated them in the 1848 Manifesto of the Communist Party."

Today, revisionists are trying to push different interpretations of the nation's birth. But let them talk. The FBI will nail them as terrorists if they talk about the Constitution. Issues are for amusement purposes only. Political power is the only reality.

The practical politician recognizes this and acts accordingly.

Now go out and get some votes.


George F. Smith is a freelance writer. His other articles may be found in the Writer Index.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/20/2002 9:10:18 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul; tpaine; OWK; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Mercuria; MadameAxe; redrock; infowars; ...
-
2 posted on 06/20/2002 9:10:42 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I have wondered recently on why it is that the MOST IMPORTANT thing that an elected official thinks about when he gets in office is HOW DO I GET REELECTED? So on issues they vote on their thinking will be based on how they think their potential voter will think of the votes they make (not that most people pay attention to votes) not on what is right. And if this is the main thrust of how their votes are determined, doesn't it stand to reason that we need to have SOLID term limits.
3 posted on 06/20/2002 9:40:33 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Just like my bumper sticker says: "Citizen legislators, not career politicians"
4 posted on 06/20/2002 10:02:46 AM PDT by KentuckyWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Don't vote; it only encourages them.
5 posted on 06/20/2002 10:39:13 AM PDT by society-by-contract
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
It really is the "Matrix". Our government is a total illusion built on a mountain of lies. One more 9/11, and pop goes the weasel.
6 posted on 06/20/2002 2:25:53 PM PDT by Russell Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
P.J. O'Rourke (my favorite author/humorist) nailed it:

"All you have to know about any politician is that the job he has now is the best one he will ever have!"

7 posted on 06/20/2002 2:51:33 PM PDT by saurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
btt
8 posted on 06/20/2002 4:42:09 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: society-by-contract
my bumper snicker says, don't blame me, i voted for myself...
9 posted on 06/20/2002 9:02:14 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson