Is our war against the Islamic fanatics really driven by human sexuality?

philosofy123

[philosofy123]

Is our war against the Islamic fanatics is really a sex driven war?

From the beginning of time the human animal addressed the basic biological need for sex, in a way much similar to animals. The men need sex basically for its pleasure, and the women need it mostly for propagating the human race. Thus men looked at women as a sex object? And women looked at men for protection/commitment.

Since then, civilization and religions imposed different rules on the human animal, and sexuality. We cannot walk around naked, men cannot have as many wives as they want, men cannot beat the women if they refused to have sex with them, men cannot throw out women who become unattractive/old/back-talkers without paying dearly!......The problem with this picture is as the world civilization imposed artificial restriction on the male animal, the Islamic religion kept most of the animal privileges of the cave men to its followers. Islam was invented by a man, and to assure its propagation, it catered to men.

At this point, Moslems who live in Moslem countries do not care how the rest of the world behaves. That is simply because most of these countries are still protecting the rights of the men to abuse women. However, there are two problems, first the Moslem men who visit the west are terrified from the amount of freedom our females have, and second, the new global village and the dominance of the Hollywood movies and American culture assures these backward people that there is no place to run or to hide from the new way of life, where women have equality. They fear the potential of revolts from their female population, and a continuous degradation of their rights to use and abuse women.

[demlosers]

An interesting hypothesis. The Islamist may fear losing control of their world at the subconscious level.

[Cachelot]

I just want you to know that your work has been archived next to the "Space Jews with Mind Altering Rays" article. Consider yourself the recipient of the Virtual Plaque of The Confused Garter Snake.

[Chad Bagwell]

Is our war against the Islamic fanatics really driven by human sexuality?

Nope.

[The Big Dog]

I'll go with a big "NO"

[GBA]

Boy howdy! You're waaayy out there!

Your premise "The men need sex basically for its pleasure, and the women need it mostly for propagating the human race." is incorrect from several points of view, evolutionary and otherwise. No need to go much farther than that for me. Nice try, though.

[PoisedWoman]

Unless Muslims consider the WTC Towers phallic symbols. Al Qaeda might have some kind of Edifice Complex.

[another cricket]

No. Interesting idea. But you leave out the domination part of it. Not of women but of other men. A lack of mental freedom if you will must be imposed on everyone. Everything in their lives must be regulated weighed, measured and controlled.

There is only one way to do things in their eyes and if we will not follow that one way we must be compelled by force or be killed. They could eliminate “woman is inferior” entirely and the war would still continue because we would not be following their little rules on what to eat, what to wear and what to think.

a.cricket

[Salman]

Islam was invented by a man, and to assure its propagation, it catered to men.

Other religions were invented by men without going to the same extremes.

[TransOxus]

They are simply a bunch of queers who set up weird laws so that they can keep women exclusively for propogation without losing face, be laughed at, get invaded by those outraged by these sissy filth.

[mikeIII]

Is our war against the Islamic fanatics really driven by human sexuality?

Oh yeah, baby!

[Chad Bagwell]

Then why attack the Pentagon, love of triangles?