Posted on 06/09/2002 8:51:11 PM PDT by crystalk
When Chandra's body was found on May 22, we started getting a list of clothing items supposedly found with it: sweat shirt, sweat pants, who knows what all. When I and other posters pointed out that she could never have been wearing all this at one time, the official list condensed to say that what was found was: spandex tights, T-shirt, panties, tube-type exercise bra, and ordinary sneakers (not running or specialty shoes). This at least brought it down to what might be worn at the same time.
However, it raised other questions. This is what someone might wear while working out on the weight machines in a gym [and oddly enough she was last seen, by the official time line, at a gym 2 blks from her apt] but one would NEVER jog or go on a long walk in spandex tights, and this seems a little chilly for 4/30 in DC unless in the very warmest part of the day.
BTW none of these clothes were said to be "worn" or ON the body, but just thrown out near it in a random fashion, and now the Enquirer says the tights were found around a tree clear up on the flatter area near the (official, maintained) West Ridge Trail in RCP!
We have seen speculation all along that Chandra maintained clothing at Gary's apartment, or her own, but that was all neatly packed by someone, in bags ready to leave, when her apt was searched 5/6/01. Only a few things left in drawers or closet.
It is totally non-credible that Chandra would have gone out to meet Gary, or to lunch with friends, or even to a bank or shopping, in the attire found on the slope in Rock Creek Park.
Even AT the gym, would she not have showered and changed back into something more street-worthy before going home?
I am wondering if these items, assuming what was found is only what we are now told, were WHAT SHE HAD IN A LOCKER AT THE GYM, to use just there while working out and then changed out of.
For a year, we were told that on Monday evening 4/30/01 she checked out of the gym and terminated her membership, saying she would soon move back to California. Suddenly about a month ago I began to see it said that the 4/30 transaction as evidenced by a receipt found in her apartment [virtually the ONLY thing found there: the apt had been sanitized and wiped clean of fingerprints]--showed Chandra not as having terminated, but as having PAID FOR ANOTHER MONTH--ie May, and thus continued her membership. Which is it? We are being told two stories. If the new story is true, was she really even planning to leave DC at ALL?
It has struck me that, if someone who was throwing out her bones (body, corpse) in Rock Creek Park had only a nude body, whether fresh or decomposing, and wanted to set it up to look like she had been attacked there...and this was after May 16, when all of Chandra's clothes had been taken by her parents...Where on earth could the perp get anything of hers? Answer: How about the contents of her gym locker, this one outfit she wore there while working out. [It was said that Gary and Dayton were also members of this gym.]
That might also account for the fact her name was sewn into certain seams...
I do not believe that Sanchez has a home in Forest Hills, nor near Klingle Mansion, but she certainly does know Condit very well and appears to be on the best of terms with him. May have been involved in business deals with him as well.
But I had others in mind: I think there are several, congresswomen, men, and others, whose homes in Forest Hills could have been made available to Condit...surely those must be often vacant, and many homes of that vintage have large yards and thicketty overgrown places back in back, old garages and outbuildings that held Model A Fords but wouldn't hold 1959 US cars, got abandoned, have brush growing up in them, moss on them.
I am thinking of a certain dead-end street running parallel to Brandywine, just one block north of it, that unlike it dead ends and does not come down all the way to Broad Branch. It does get quite close, though, how many yards would you say from there to Chandra's spine?
Jack and Jill ran DOWN the hill... but only Jack came back...
This while she was trying to discover if her daughter was even missing at all! Then he talks of her in the past tense and offers $10M reward.
Let see, FReepers? How many Congress Women does California have? I think we can rule out Waters.
If you apply Occam's razor, the simplest solution is the likely solution; and that doesn't include the nefarious leg snatcher plan.
Even leaving the pelvis out, it is not statistically possible for ALL of the left leg to be unfindable, while even the tiniest bits of the rest COULD be found.
I just give up; I don't know how to draw the picture any clearer for you.
If it WASN't sawed off, how did it get separated? If the body had already decayed when this was done, so it wouldn't have had to be sawed, why, then the little bones would have been too hard to find and separate, so it must have been done while the thing would still hang together.
Hence voila, I see a saw.
Even under the best conditions, it's not something that a novice would be successful at. I've seen 'Real Hunters' try it and fail.
Skeletal remains are a different story -- especially the pelvis, which could easily be broken into two halves.
You are as full of sh!t as a goose, and I really wish you could give it a very long rest.
I did not say I would be able to do it. I did not say YOU, or the average Joe, would be able to do it.
Somebody, however, was able to do it, for it was done.
I also did not say that it was cut up while still very fresh, necessarily, but probably was cut up while still fresh enough to hold together as a leg/ankle/foot unit, and not be dripping small pieces about. IMO. Or maybe it WAS rotten, and WAS dripping.
Like the funeral home ad, "remains to be seen."
Why is it, always, that so many wish I would shut up, without saying where I am wrong? Surely you admit this dismemberment DID occur?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.