Skip to comments.
Senate Hearing Set On UN Women's Discrimination Treaty
CNSNews.com ^
| June 4, 2002
| Jim Burns
Posted on 06/06/2002 8:19:26 AM PDT by madfly
|
Senate Hearing Set On UN Women's Discrimination Treaty
By Jim Burns Senior Staff Writer June 04, 2002
www.CNSNews.com - (CNSNews.com) - A Senate committee hearing on a United Nations treaty to address gender discrimination is set for later this month, Capitol Hill sources tell CNSNews.com. The treaty, titled the "Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women," has drawn criticism from conservative groups.
Sources say the hearing will be a FULL Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing that will be chaired by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) on JUNE 13 at 9:30 am.
A spokesman for Boxer would only say that a hearing is being talked about for around that time but would not comment further.
Other sources tell CNSNews.com that Bush administration officials are trying to avoid testifying before the committee on the issue, because the administration was initially in favor of the treaty and now appears to be backing off.
Sources also say the administration is trying to get Boxer to call off the hearing but it does not appear that she is agreeing.
The White House did not return phone calls seeking comment.
The treaty known as "CEDAW" was adopted in 1979 by the full United Nations General Assembly. President Jimmy Carter signed it in 1980. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed it on September 29, 1994, but the full Senate has not ratified it.
It is often described as an "international bill of rights for women" and consists of a preamble and 30 articles and defines what constitutes discrimination against women and sets up an agenda to end such discrimination.
165 countries have signed the treaty thus far and that legally binds them to implement its provisions.
The Convention defines discrimination against women as "any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status," in any field of endeavor.
When countries signed the treaty they agreed to make women and men equal in their legal system, abolish all discriminatory laws and adopt appropriate ones prohibiting discrimination against women.
The United Nations in a statement said the treaty is "the only human rights treaty which affirms the reproductive rights of women and targets culture and tradition as influential forces shaping gender roles and family relations."
"It affirms women's right to acquire, change or retain their nationality and the nationality of their children," the UN said on its website.
Countries that have ratified or acceded to the Convention must submit national reports, at least every four years to the UN, on measures they have taken to comply with their treaty obligations.
The Concerned Women for America, a conservative women's group, is against Senate ratification of the treaty.
"Women in the United States have the right to vote. They are fully participating members of society, protected by the federal Civil Rights Code and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) as well as state civil rights codes and state employment commissions," the CWA said in a statement on its website.
"The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women is flawed. The US Senate must not ratify it. At its best, CEDAW is unnecessary. At its worst, CEDAW unravels America's families and forces women to model themselves after global feminists' ideal image," the group concluded.
But Amnesty International (AI), a liberal human rights group, thinks the Senate should quickly ratify the treaty.
"The United States has already ratified other human rights treaties, including one banning discrimination on the basis of race. The United States should show leadership in the battle against discrimination against women as well, and (treaty) ratification is one way to do it," according to Amnesty International.
"Women in other countries also need the United States to speak loudly and clearly in support of the treaty, so that it can be used more effectively in their struggles. Without US support and ratification, other governments can easily ignore the Convention's mandate and their obligations under it," AI concluded.
|
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; boxer; california; cedaw; familyvalues; government; mothersday; sexuality; terrorwar; untreaties; womensrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Action Alert - Tell Washington YOU will decide what's right for your family, not the UN!
1
posted on
06/06/2002 8:19:26 AM PDT
by
madfly
To:
Free the USA; Seamole; Fish out of Water; Carry_Okie; 2Jedismom; 2sheep; 4Freedom; Aliska...
Let's make some noise in Washington!
2
posted on
06/06/2002 8:21:16 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: madfly
I can tell my Senators all kinds of thing but with one Moron and one hardcore Socialist I seem to have little impact on their decisions.
To: A.Pole; Agrarian; Alamo-Girl; Anthem; asneditor; AUgrad; Aurelius;
Barry Goldwater; billbears...
ACTION ALERT
PRESERVE THE FAMILY
PLEASE DO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TODAY: 1. Call or Email President Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell and the Following Senators with the Message: "NO TO CEDAW." White House switchboard: 202-456-1111 Email: president@whitehouse.gov State Department switchboard: 202-647-6575 Email: secretary@state.gov Capitol switchboard: 202-224-3121. 2. Utilize talk and Christian radio, telephone trees, and other resources to generate calls to the offices listed above. 3. Forward This Alert To Other Concerned Citizens And Ask Them To Contact President Bush, Secretary of State Powell, and targeted Senators. If your Senators are on this list, it is imperative that you let him or her know that you OPPOSE CEDAW. Even if your Senators are not on this list, you should still urge them to OPPOSE CEDAW. We need as many voices as possible to speak out AGAINST CEDAW! The Capitol Switchboard number is 202-224-3121. Wayne Allard (CO) George Allen (VA) Robert Bennett (UT) Kit Bond (MO) Sam Brownback (KS) Jim Bunning (KY) Conrad Burns (MT) Ben Nighthorse Campbell (CO) Thad Cochran (MS) Larry Craig (ID) Mike Crapo (ID) Mike DeWine (OH) Pete Domenici (NM) John Ensign (NV) Mike Enzi (WY) Peter Fitzgerald (IL) Bill Frist (TN) Phil Gramm (TX) Charles Grassley (IA) Judd Gregg (NH) Chuck Hagel (NE) Orrin Hatch (UT) Jesse Helms (NC) Tim Hutchinson (AR) Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX) Jim Inhofe (OK) Jon Kyl (AZ) Trent Lott (MS) Richard Lugar (R-IN) John McCain (AZ) Mitch McConnell (KY) Frank Murkowski (AK) Don Nickles (OK) Pat Roberts (KS) Rick Santorum (PA) Jeff Sessions (AL) Richard Shelby (AL) Bob Smith (NH) Gordon Smith (OR) Ted Stevens (AK) Craig Thomas (WY) Fred Thompson (TN) Strom Thurmond (SC) George Voinovich (OH) John Warner (VA) |
|
4
posted on
06/06/2002 8:33:09 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: TerrOrWar; aristeides; BlueDogDemo; Wallaby; thinden;
Plummz; roughrider; archy; LSJohn...
This was posted by RFP yesterday.
This was a www.sixtysecondactivist.com action item a couple of weeks ago. If y'all don't already subscribe, you should. They have pre-written responses on many conservative issues ready for email subscribers to edit or send as is. It is directly linked to congressional emails so they can be sent at the click of a button (just enter your ZIP code), or the letters can be printed out for snail mail.
5
posted on
06/06/2002 8:39:23 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: TerrOrWar; aristeides; BlueDogDemo; Wallaby; thinden;
Plummz; roughrider; archy; LSJohn...
6
posted on
06/06/2002 8:49:32 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: madfly
The liberals view of Eutopia is a world without religion, without property boundries, and total economic equality.
All these things create war.
They have to be eliminated BY LAW. Anyone who objects is sent before the judge for sentancing.
Free will by any group or nation will not be tolerated.
A one world religion of political correctness. A one world government. A one world economy. Under the leadership of someone refered to by prophacy as the Anti-Christ, who will become the one world liberal leader.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again 100 times:
Nobody likes being forced to 'think' as the liberals dictate they should.
Forcing someone to think contrary to their conscience creates hate.
Hate creates violence.
Violence creates war.
The poltically correct say they do it to SAVE humanity, but the very thing they say they're trying to prevent is mulitplying in stregth every day because of political correctness docturine.
There's more hate in the world today because of political correctness and the thought police than ever before.
Their goal of global peace will soon become world destruction by their own hands.
To: ME4W;Free the USA
Try calling the whitehouse switchboard to just say UN-SIGN CEDAW! or Call BOXER.
Federal Government
U.S. President
- President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC 20500
(202) 456-1414/FAX (202) 456-2461
Web Page: www.whitehouse.gov
E-Mail: president@whitehouse.gov
- Barbara Boxer (D)
- 201 N. E St., #210
- San Bernardino, CA 92401
- (909) 888-8525/FAX (909) 888-8613
- Hart Building, #112
- Washington, DC 20510
- (202) 224-3553
- E-Mail: senator@boxer.senate.gov
-
8
posted on
06/06/2002 9:06:55 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: The Shrew;
it'salmosttolate ;governsleastgovernsbest ;Neil E. Wright;
ALOHA RONNIE...
9
posted on
06/06/2002 9:09:35 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: madfly
Imagine telling a vegitarian that meat is better for them because it's the major source of B12. Therefore, by law, for their own good, they must eat meat. Would they say "peace and love?"
Imagine telling an environmentalist that SUVs are safer. Therefore, by law, for their own good, they must drive SUVs. Would they say "peace and love?"
Imagine going to a muslum community and telling them to reduce their population through abortion because it's best for mother earth. Would they say "peace and love?"
Politcal correctness is a religion that creates hate. It has to be seen for what it is, too.
Instead of saying "kill the infedels", they're saying "jail the objectors." What's the difference? Not much.
To: madfly
"To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove
from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family
traditions and national identification."
Brock Chisholm, while director of UN World Health Organization
United Nations Free Zone
To: madfly
WE NEED A KOFI BREAK !
DUMP THE U.N. NOW ! !
To: It'salmosttolate
You should mail that quote to the Whitehouse while asking them to vote no. It's a good one.
To: RCW2001,cardinal4,ValerieUSA,Republicus2001,joltinjoe,KSCITYBOY, GlesenerL,montag813, muir_redwo
14
posted on
06/06/2002 10:02:24 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: Reardon Metal; RightWingLady;Rightwing Conspirator1;RikaStrom;
shotabug;Sierra Wasp; Shermy...
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination entered into force as an international treaty on 3 September 1981. One hundred sixtyseven countries have ratified the treaty. Former president Jimmy Carter signed CEDAW in 1980, but under the articles of the U.S. Constitution, twothirds of the U.S. Senate must approve the treaty for it to become law. Fortunately, the Senate has not yet ratified CEDAW, making the United States the only developed country in the world not to do so. Why has CEDAW, the Convention of Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, never been ratified?, asks Sen. Jesse Helms (RN.C.), chairman of the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee. Because it is a bad treaty; it is a terrible treaty negotiated by radical feminists with the intent of enshrining their radical antifamily agenda into international law.
15
posted on
06/06/2002 10:10:52 AM PDT
by
madfly
To: concerned about politics;madfly
To: madfly
What complete NONSENSE! As a woman I am offended that anyone thinks I need a stupid international treaty to speak for me. I am an AMERICAN CITIZEN, not a slave or peasant in some rankwater third world country living under the dictates of an oppressive regime, the sex trade and crushing poverty. How dare these corrupt U.N. men presume to know what's best for anyone?
To: madfly; all; biblewonk
The Concerned Women for America, a conservative women's group, is against Senate ratification of the treaty. It would be interesting to know whether CWA would have been against the ratification of the Amendment XIX (women's suffrage). Better yet, would they support its repeal?
To: newgeezer
Yeah right.
To: Scuttlebutt;MedProf;LadyX;Vigilant1; AnnaZ;
Lazamataz; Sir Gawain; Mercuria;
hogwaller...
This is part of a long explanation of CEDAW from the Concerned Women for America website
Exposing CEDAW
The United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
By Laurel MacLeod and Catherina Hurlburt
Revised: September 5, 2000Concerned Women for America strongly opposes the passage of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). This treaty is not necessary and would challenge the laws and culture of the United States.Encroachment Upon Sovereignty
The U.N. General Assembly adopted CEDAW on December 18, 1979. President Jimmy Carter signed it in 1980. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed it on September 29, 1994, but the full Senate has not ratified it. So far, 165 countries have signed the treaty, legally binding them to implement its provisions.1
According to Article VI, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, treatiesalong with the Constitution and United States lawsare "the supreme Law of the Land." Our founding fathers believed that any ratified treaty should be constitutional. That is, it should line up with the principles of the Constitution and our republic. CEDAWs "use of overly broad language
allows the U.N. to invade the most personal of relationships between men and women."2 For example, it would require individual American states to give up authority in family law, allowing the federal government to take over family law.
Therefore, the founding fathers certainly would have rejected it. As President Thomas Jefferson wrote, "If the treaty making power is boundless, then we have no Constitution."3
Regrettably, todays U.S. Supreme Court does not use strict constitutional interpretation as its measure, and, often, neither does Congress or the president. Therefore, CWA is convinced that, if the Senate ever ratifies CEDAW, the federal government would allow it to supersede all federal and state laws, as evidenced by past federal court rulings.4
20
posted on
06/06/2002 10:51:44 AM PDT
by
madfly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson