Focused on the truth.
Posted on 06/05/2002 5:59:01 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
"Rhetoric," according to the dictionary, is "the art of using words in speaking or writing so as to persuade or influence others." It is often referred to today as "politically correct" comments or writing and is an art form that was very much the order of the day during the Clinton Administration. The media, especially the Washington Press Corps, really loved the Clinton rhetoric and praised his "brilliance" as a leader.
The exact opposite of rhetoric is a conversation with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. (1) Any reporter or member of the public who thinks that Donald Rumsfeld is trying to persuade you or influence you with his responses, must be brain dead. He is so non-rhetorical that, before 9-11, the press corps had pretty much written him off.
In fact, on September 10, 2001 Brian Wilson of Fox News said: "Is Rumsfeld to be taken seriously? After all, there are rumors swirling in Washington that he might soon quit or be asked to quit." Nine months later, the Washington press corps realizes that Donald Rumsfeld is not going to be ousted through the use of their favorite control mechanism - floating rumors that he is going to quit or be fired. Somehow, in that short period of time, Rumsfeld has become the Rock Star of the Bush Administration in the eyes of the public and the man to send to head off nuclear war in the mind of the president.
No one has been more surprised at Donald Rumsfeld's popularity than the Washington press corps and, at least where Rumsfeld is concerned; it is the press corps, not Rumsfeld that has been forced to change. The Washington Press Corps today asks Rumsfeld a lot fewer stupid questions than they did six months ago.
However, the media, as it exists today, is still very much wedded to the notion that news only consists of controversy and, if there is no controversy, there is no story worth reporting. This naturally leads to the kind of news that produces popular, high-paid talking heads on TV - confrontational, accusatory, and entertainment oriented news shows. In recent days, the media's favorite news peg has been an obvious effort to paint the FBI and George W. Bush as somehow having "known" the World Trade Center was about to be bombed, and having done nothing about it.
On May 17th, on CBS' Today Show Katie Couric asked Rumsfeld: "Certainly you've heard about all the controversy, with Dick Gephardt asking what the president knew and when he knew it. Many newspapers across the country are focused on this story. What is your reaction that the Bush administration perhaps did not act quickly enough or efficaciously enough when it came to warnings that some kind of terrorist attack might occur on this country?
Rumsfeld replied: "Well, I think, when all the dust settles, the American people will know the truth. (2) And the truth is that every day there are numerous threat warnings -- the walk-ins off the street, pieces or scraps of intelligence collected by the FBI, pieces of information that are gathered by the Central Intelligence Agency in one way or another. And they are then looked at and sorted and sifted. "And what has to be done is to recognize that when you're all through sifting all of those, some, a very small number, prove to be actionable."
Rumsfeld ignored the bait, Couric's attempt to get him to say something derogatory about or in defense of the FBI and the President. Instead, he just laid out the facts and told Couric, and whoever else might be listening, that the American people will make a sensible decision when they have the facts - which he then gave them. She, and the public, could take it or leave it.
In a May 30th press briefing, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was asked by a reporter: "Well, Mr. Secretary, do you think war between those countries (India and Pakistan) can be avoided? Do you see a shift towards a potential nuclear or even a conventional outbreak there?"
Rumsfeld replied: "You know, it's a sensitive subject, and it's almost like the subject of threat warnings. Almost anything anyone says in response to a question, someone will characterize as something other than it is." (3)
I don't know of any news source that picked up that comment, but it illustrates, in a nutshell, why this blunt government official with a wry sense of humor has become the rock star of the Bush Administration. The American people have come to love Donald Rumsfeld because they trust him to tell the truth. He isn't trying to use his looks, his smile, his cleverness, and his gift of words to influence you or persuade you. He really doesn't care, it seems, whether you are persuaded or not.
On May 22, in an interview on PBS, Jim Lehrer, apparently looking for a plot, noted there seemed to be "a pattern" in Rumsfeld's comments before a Senate hearing and comments made about the same time by Vice-President Cheney and FBI Director Mueller. He asked, "What's going on? Are all these things a part of a pattern?"
Rumsfeld responded: "Well, the vice president was on "Meet the Press" and asked a question by Tim Russert, and he answered it. I was before a Senate Committee and was asked a question by Senator Inouye, and I answered it. There is no pattern. It's just the truth. (4) The truth is that there were hundred of terrorists trained very well in al-Qaeda training camps, in Afghanistan, and elsewhere. They are around the world in forty or fifty countries. They have money. They are skillful at what they do, as we saw on September 11.
"We know they have been actively seeking out weapons of mass destruction, and we know that they have close relationships with terrorist countries that have those weapons. So if I'm asked that question, I didn't answer that question any differently for Senator Inouye in the hearing yesterday than I have answered it every week or two for the past six months."
The truth. What a novel concept to introduce into politics! Now, if we could only introduce the concept into the Senate and the House elections this fall…
To comment: mmostert@bannerofliberty.com
Links:
| To find all articles tagged or indexed using Rumsfeld, click below: | ||||
| click here >>> | Rumsfeld | <<< click here | ||
| (To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) | ||||
Focused on the truth.
Rumsfeld replied: "You know, it's a sensitive subject, and it's almost like the subject of threat warnings. Almost anything anyone says in response to a question, someone will characterize as something other than it is." (3)
And that answer is exactly why we like him. He saw right through the loaded question and answered it quite honestly, but without giving any ammunition to the press to take him out of context. And, he told them why he wasn't giving them ammo. Brilliant and honest. Presidential, even.
Oh, yes! Men used to be this way before they traded their responsibilities / birthrights for easy sex/a pot of stew...whatever...(my Grandmother could take on Hillary, too). (^:
Kim Weissman-
While the media pretends
that absolute neutrality makes them morally superior
to those who actually retain the ability
to distinguish right from wrong, such pretensions
call into question, not their neutrality, but
their contact with reality.
www.tysknews.com
Oh they did! Remember how Matt Drudge made mincemeat out of every one of those pea-brains?
Of course, they didn't need anyone to reveal how low their intellects and moral standards were; that's one thing they always managed to do well.
If those boneheads had had I.Q.'s above the Jimmy Carter level and moral standards higher than the Bill Clinton's, after what Drudge did to them they'd have high-tailed it out of Washington and never shown their faces again.
They can't help asking stupid questions. They can't do any better. Maybe they're just asking fewer questions.
I would really love to see a collection of classic Rumsfeld Q&A exchanges with the liberal air-head press.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.