Dan Quayle knew better.
I'm getting awfully sick of swallowing all this liberalism and calling it 'conservatism'.
At least they didn't blame it on burning crosses. I'll wait until "Drydge" reports on it.
Somehow, I also think that it's liable to come back a bite us really hard in the future.
Even if Bush gets the Senate back, how's he going to flip-flop back to the right now and retain any credibility. If being popular means going to the left, then how's he ever going to move back to the right? And if he does go back to the right at some point, won't he simply have given RATS the rope to hang him with? -- He's stated that they're right on just about everything that is an issue these days.
Show me the science!\
The United States will be substantially changed in the next few decades, claims the Bush report. The United States will "very likely" be seeing the "disruption of snow-fed water supplies, more stifling heat waves and the permanent disappearance of Rocky Mountain meadows and coastal marshes."
MORE
"The new report's predictions present a sharp contrast to the administration's previous statements on climate change, in which President Bush always spoke in generalities and stressed the need for much more research to resolve scientific questions."
The move puts a substantial distance between the administration and the energy industry and automakers.
Impacting Hard...
First it's the NYT... nuff said.
Second, it's Sunday night and Drudge is in his usual grandstanding headline mode again, trolling for listeners to his radio show.
TMMT
We are on record as saying that Kyoto is as bad a cure as the cause, but we still need to address the problem, not pretend this is a matter of ideology and not a matter of science.
Someone---someone named "Karl"---must be telling 'em the GW Administration has to look more "environment-friendly." Expect more of these Clintonian "initiatives" as the election draws closer.
Read my lips...
Dan Quayle knew better.
I think it's time for Bush to stop being a nice guy on this subject, or it will continue. There is a whole layer of management that serves at the pleasure of the President, and if I were Bush, I would be most displeasured by this.... to the point that thirty or forty people at EPA would lose their jobs, starting with Ms. Whitman. Maybe the next time some under-assistant deputy secretary sees one of these things churning toward the door, something will be done about it. This is getting real old. |
Think about this one a minute - a major Bush "turnaround" released over the weekend for discussion ALL WEEK LONG!
That's not likely. Besides, Bush has been out giving all kinds of speeches saying our major focus is to attack the terrorists. Why would he want to distract from that message?
You may pick your leg up at the checkout after 10 PM.
This will be the third or fourth time that the Clinton holdovers and the AFSCME drones in the bureaucracy have slipped one out the door in an effort to embarrass the Administration.