Skip to comments.
(North Carolina) GOP smells victory in 2002
The News & Observer ^
| June 2, 2002
| ROB CHRISTENSEN
Posted on 06/02/2002 6:56:14 AM PDT by jern
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-147 next last
To: wasfree
I still do not see where any good has ever come from a female having authority. When women enter a debate reason and logic take a back seat to feelings and 'compassion'. I'm a heathen, but I pretty much gotta agree with you here...
61
posted on
06/02/2002 2:51:27 PM PDT
by
Arleigh
To: wasfree
And what exactly did Paul say? That women can't be preachers right? What woman in gov't is a preacher? That women can't lead their household in matters of spirituality. What woman in gov't is leading in matters of spirituality?
Still waiting for the scripture.
62
posted on
06/02/2002 2:54:09 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: marajade
Your preacher was lying to you...You DO realize I'm being sarcastic here? Don't you?
My point is that I work with a lot of highly educated, highly successful blacks, and MOST of them think something along these lines. Even the least militant blacks often have a paranoid streak you wouldn't guess was there until you really get to know them.
November is gonna be real interesting...
63
posted on
06/02/2002 2:55:04 PM PDT
by
Arleigh
To: Arleigh
At first I didn't but I did finally figure it out... Hence, my reply about your preacher lying to you...
64
posted on
06/02/2002 2:56:10 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: Arleigh
My point is that I work with a lot of highly educated, highly successful blacks, and MOST of them think something along these lines.
Then they must not be using the education they got.
65
posted on
06/02/2002 2:57:36 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: BlackbirdSST
What's so conservative about the bush agenda? Why do you think a Senate full of RINO's will do anything conservative about the courts?Most of the Senate Republicans are not RINO's. Even most RINO's will not vote to reject one of Bush's nominees. Bush's court nominees have been conservative as proven by the fact that Leahy is keeping virtually all of them bottled up in committee and Thomas Pickering was shot down after a huge smear campaign. Do you know who Thomas Pickering is? I find that people like you usually have no idea what Bush's court nominees are. You just speak in ignorant generalities.
66
posted on
06/02/2002 3:00:15 PM PDT
by
lasereye
To: Arleigh
I see your point, but I'd really like to see this kind of turnout:
67
posted on
06/02/2002 3:02:11 PM PDT
by
callisto
To: marajade
Yes, that was directed at demidog. Sorry for the confusion.
To: arkfreepdom
that's okay...
69
posted on
06/02/2002 3:15:07 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: marajade
That's right. Bush can't sign any of these treasury busting budgets unless they are first approved and submitted to him by Congress.
Reagan was also stuck with a spend happy Congress, which was really to blame for the deficits, even though Dems like to blame his tax cuts.
70
posted on
06/02/2002 3:16:19 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: Jorge
I guess he's just supposed to veto every bill even though that bill has huge Republican congressional support... Right...
71
posted on
06/02/2002 3:17:19 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: marajade
Then they must not be using the education they got.It's not just a smart/dumb thing - although that's part of the equation. It's a completely different world view. Just like a scientist can look at a bird's feather and see the wonders of evolution while a creationist can see the divine hand of God.
I live in a largely black neighborhood in a mostly black city, and work with a lot of well educated blacks. At the risk of stereotyping, they tend to see conspiracies everywhere. For example, bank doesn't get my mortgage check and I blame the Post Office for losing my letter. A black friend says, don't I know banks "lose" a certain number of payments each month so they can boost their profits with late charges? He wants to know if I'm really THAT naive.
In my personal experience, most blacks are CONVINCED that their candidate was elected president but that "The Man" stole the election. Hence, their votes didn't count. Hence they were "disenfranchised" - a big word they like to toss around.
72
posted on
06/02/2002 3:43:14 PM PDT
by
Arleigh
To: callisto
Would the Democrat help push forward Pres. Bush's agenda? I suppose you misunderstood. Bush's agenda is bad for America. It's indistinguishable from the democrat agenda.
73
posted on
06/02/2002 3:46:57 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: marajade
Does that include control of the senate? Bush got his unconstitutional "Patriot Act" passed without any need for control of the Senate or House. He got the totally bogus farm welfare bill passed and it didn't require a majority. He got the Education bill passed without any problem. He is a socialist and it doesn't make any difference which party is in charge. The GOP were willing accomplices in passing the crap he's been willing to sign or asked for (including the blatantly unconstitutional CFR).
74
posted on
06/02/2002 3:50:17 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: jern
Yeah, the ignoramuses think they smell victory because they're putting on a full court press to anoint a candidate who could win running as a democrat.
The GOP is too ridiculous to be believed. They'll merge with the democrats as soon as we all get together and form a conservative party. We might as well get to it, because they're becoming indistinguishable from their intended partners as we speak.
75
posted on
06/02/2002 4:32:39 PM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Twodees
They'll merge with the democrats as soon as we all get together and form a conservative party. I think that has already been done, and you have several to choose from. It is a veritable embarrassement of riches for you. Of course, you probably vote for one of them in any event, so I don't think you are going anywhere.
76
posted on
06/02/2002 4:35:08 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: vannrox
Both parties want it to be close, even contested after the vote is in. As we saw in 2000, that is the best way to get people who held their noses to vote for the candidate they chose to become solid partisans for awhile.
It's a damn dog and pony show with a dead dog and a cardboard cutout of a pony. The GOP is seeing to it that the choice will be between a liberal republican and a liberal democrat. What a reeking pile.
77
posted on
06/02/2002 4:38:15 PM PDT
by
Twodees
To: callisto
A GOP majority Senate confirmed Janet Reno, left her in office and acquitted Clinton. Fewer people are buying the "advantages" of a GOP controlled Senate. Both houses of Congress should be required to wear those distinctive Stock Exchange trader's blazers, in pink for the GOP and red for the democrats so we could tell one side from the other.
78
posted on
06/02/2002 4:45:56 PM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Demidog
And how many judges has he got voted on?
79
posted on
06/02/2002 4:57:16 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: Arleigh
I know you were being sarcastic, but you are right in the sense that many blacks do have a paranoid streak. Sometimes its warranted, most of the time it is not. In Florida, the paranoia was rampant. Basically, many blacks SAW police and were intimidated. The reason so many cops? Because DemocRATS who worked at the polling places were scared about a large black vote and were intimidated and asked for more officers. The paranoia and naive that many blacks show does frighten me, but I believe that if they acquire the knowledge and are treated well, and no misled by liberals, they in general will be fine.
80
posted on
06/02/2002 5:23:05 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson