Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PREGNANT PRETEEN
AP Wire | May 29, 2002

Posted on 05/29/2002 8:52:45 AM PDT by NYer

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. (AP) _ An 11-year-old city girl who police said was impregnated by a 75-year-old man has given birth.

A state Department of Children and Families spokeswoman confirmed Tuesday that the girl is now a mother. The girl and the baby are both in DCF custody.

``We will continue to be involved with her and the baby. Both are safe, spokeswoman Joan Gurski said.

Jimmy Kave, accused of fathering the child, is charged with six counts of first-degree sexual assault, eight counts of risk of injury to a minor and two counts of sexual assault in the fourth degree.

Police said Kave, who was arrested April 17, admitted having sex on several occasions with the girl beginning in January 2001, but claimed she had enticed him. Kave met the girl through an ``Adopt-A-Godparent'' program at his Bridgeport housing complex.

Authorities also charged the girl's doctors with failing to report the abuse to authorities when they learned she was pregnant. Attorneys for Drs. Mukesh Shah and Ann Lule have asked a judge to dismiss those charges, claiming there is insufficient evidence.

AP-ES-05-29-02 1138EDT


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: adoptagodparent; preteen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: NYer
Authorities also charged the girl's doctors with failing to report the abuse to authorities when they learned she was pregnant. Attorneys for Drs. Mukesh Shah and Ann Lule have asked a judge to dismiss those charges, claiming there is insufficient evidence.

Insufficient evidence? Insufficient evidence? -so this newborn baby has no meaning? It just does not exist?

The 75 year old man should spend his last years locked up. And the doctors and anyone else that "looked the other way" in this should be severely punished. Eleven years old......

21 posted on 05/29/2002 9:13:53 AM PDT by DETAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
If this was New Jersey, the Judge would be saying that they just clicked and satisfied their sexual urges.

DAMN ALL PERVERTS!!!!!!AND THAT INCLUDES THE JUDGES WHO OKAY THESE ACTS AGAINST CHILDREN

22 posted on 05/29/2002 9:13:55 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Earlier thread
23 posted on 05/29/2002 9:20:11 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
Police said Kave, who was arrested April 17, admitted having sex on several occasions with the girl beginning in January 2001, but claimed she had enticed him.

Perhaps she snapped her thong at him and he only followed his hero's lead. Even Chris Dodd thinks Clinton is a hero.

24 posted on 05/29/2002 9:27:40 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
If this was New Jersey, the Judge would be saying that they just clicked and satisfied their sexual urges.

I'm missing a reference here...
25 posted on 05/29/2002 9:31:53 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DETAILER
Since January 2001...she was only 10, possibly 9, when she "enticed" him. This is one of the sickest things imaginable.

I have an 11 year old daughter. I would gladly tear apart, with my bare hands, any man who touched her. But I have no doubt my husband would blow the pervert's head off first.

26 posted on 05/29/2002 9:35:47 AM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Kave met the girl through an ``Adopt-A-Godparent'' program at his Bridgeport housing complex.

Another liberal feel-good answer to society's woes?

How about just have "families." Nah. They'll never go for it. Too old fashioned.

27 posted on 05/29/2002 9:36:41 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badray
The first thing I want to see is a paternity test. Maybe the old guy did have sex with her, but that doesn't mean that he is the father.

What difference does it make whether he's the father or not? He had sex with an eleven-year-old child, for Pete's sake.

28 posted on 05/29/2002 9:37:55 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
That NJ judge is amazing, isn't he. Apart from his disgusting personal opinion, it seems he doesn't even begin to grasp the concept that he is supposed to apply the law, not opine on how things we have laws against aren't really bad. I think he needs to do some time in a maximum security prison -- it would only take a couple of days to get a reality check through his thick skull, assuming the other prisoners were informed in advance of what he was in for. And of course the other prisoners would all say it had been consensual, and they'd make sure he knew better than to contradict their claim.
29 posted on 05/29/2002 9:40:00 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio; OldFriend
The story OldFriend is referring to is here
30 posted on 05/29/2002 9:46:15 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wattsmag2
"Got to be the next enclave of pederasts of all flavors."

Um, "pederasty" is homosexual behavior involving an adult male and a teenage boy. How did you figure it fit into this pregnancy story?

Michael

31 posted on 05/29/2002 9:50:50 AM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
I imagine that you wouldn't be leaving your 10-year old with a stranger. If it were to happen, you would certainly question your child afterwards, even just to be chatty. I am sorry, but this story stinks. Sounds to me like she was 10 going on 40. You are correct, 10 year-olds cannot consent to sexual contact, period, so therefore the geezer should justly be subject to criminal action. However, I am not convinced that this 10 year-old couldn't escape a 75 year-old's unwanted advances.
32 posted on 05/29/2002 9:53:18 AM PDT by Under the Radar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Ah, thank you. Sick and shocking.
33 posted on 05/29/2002 9:54:05 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
My darling granddaughter will be 11 on her next birthday. She's so very innocent at 10. I would love to be in a room with this pedophile for about 20 minutes. He wouldn't be fathering anymore babies!
34 posted on 05/29/2002 10:00:40 AM PDT by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Jeb Bush should have prevented this from happening.
35 posted on 05/29/2002 10:02:41 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
That was a sick and telling comment on your part. Disgusting.
36 posted on 05/29/2002 10:07:08 AM PDT by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Most sickening of all......she agreed to a THREE YEAR term in prison. The Judge decided to let her go with only probation......after all, he said, what harm was done?
37 posted on 05/29/2002 10:15:53 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Thorondir
"That was a sick and telling comment on your part. Disgusting."

You believe what it is easier for you to believe. I am not excusing his actions. But, I also am not naive enough to think that he might not be telling the truth as far as it goes. What is sick and disgusting is this society in which such things happen.

38 posted on 05/29/2002 10:16:29 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
Perhaps I misunderstood you, sir. But your comment is still perplexing to me and seems to lay the blame on the little girl and excuse the degenerate old man, who, BTW, should be executed IMO (if truly guilty of the crime).
39 posted on 05/29/2002 10:27:50 AM PDT by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NYer
What did George W Bush know about this and when did he know it?
40 posted on 05/29/2002 10:30:43 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson