What difference does it make whether he's the father or not? He had sex with an eleven-year-old child, for Pete's sake.
One of the first things that I said was that this was sick. I'm just questioning the paternity, not the act. But I am not defending what he did.
The man, and maybe even the parent(s) belong in jail.
If the baby is his, then it's scientific proof he had sex with the girl. Otherwise, it's more circumstantial. I prefer ironclad proof before drawing and quartering a defendant...