Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gunning Down The 2nd Amendment (See BS, need I say more)
CBS ^ | May 9 | Dick Meyer

Posted on 05/10/2002 4:34:45 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Very, very few judges, prosecutors or government lawyers over the past 60 years (at least)have officially taken the position that an individual right to own guns exists.

Dick, why then is it called the STANDARD Model. Also, look at Emerson, the latest case.

the one that is essentially settled law
Again, EMERSON.

The Supreme Court last dealt with the issue directly in 1939 when it clearly backed they collective, no-individual right position.

BS. Read US v Miller.

What the founders intended is unknowable. Objective truth about the meaning of the Second Amendment does not exist. Practical consensus about its meaning will not endure. The concept of "well regulated militia" is an anachronism in the 21st century.

BS. What in the blue hell? Dick, have you read the federalist papers...especially federalist 46? Huh?

1 posted on 05/10/2002 4:34:46 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
This is actually a wonderful suggestion. Most of the problems of our society have arisen from interest groups using judicial activism to bypass the amendment procedure. If gun control advocates want to come out and fight in the open to repeal the 2nd amendment, good for them! they're finally doing something in a constitutional way.

Of course, such an amendment will go nowhere (which is also exactly the way it's supposed to work).

Think how much better our society would be if abortion proponents had used similar tactics in the 60's.

2 posted on 05/10/2002 4:40:29 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
So the time for pussy footing around is over. It’s time to repeal the Second Amendment. Bag it.

Mr. Dick is sooooo right. It's long past time to stop pussyfooting around. Let's get that next American Civil War going. This ought to do it.

Then, I expect we'll see if he's got the courage to live his convictions.

3 posted on 05/10/2002 4:42:18 PM PDT by Noumenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
The use of "Very, very" like "more and more" is a sign the touchy feely BS is flowing big time.
4 posted on 05/10/2002 4:44:04 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Hey, DICK.....it's a good thing they don't "bag" the first amendment, huh? How about we just do away with ALL of them. Heck, if life gets better with the removal of 1 amendment, surely life becomes BLISS if we remove them all, right? Just because you're afraid & don't want to protect your family, DON'T make that decision for me.
5 posted on 05/10/2002 4:44:20 PM PDT by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
What the founders intended is unknowable. Objective truth about the meaning of the Second Amendment does not exist. Practical consensus about its meaning will not endure. The concept of "well regulated militia" is an anachronism in the 21st century.

Dick is an a**hole and a moron and an idiot and knows nothing of American history, nor, indeed the bloody history of the last century. Every SOB that has ever been in the US Congress for the last 200 years KNOWS (or knew) full well what the 2nd is all about - if any of them TRULY thought that there was NO RKBA, then they would have found a way to COMPLETELY ban guns a long time ago. No, Dick, you brainless fool, the RKBA is not only completely understood in both historical and contempory contexts, it will endure in America in some form or another long after you have become worm food.

And, as an aside, if objective truth cannot be known about the 2nd, then the whole damn Constitution is meaningless, the English language is worthless, the words of politicians and idiotic so-called "journalists" is nothing more than insane blather. So why the hell should we listen to the likes of Dick the Minor Moron?

6 posted on 05/10/2002 4:45:16 PM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
"What the founders intended is unknowable."

Read what they wrote, Dick.

7 posted on 05/10/2002 4:46:18 PM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
How many lies are in this article? You identified several. Also, off the top of my head, didn't a district court in Ohio rule that it was unconstitutional to deny law-abiding citizens carry permits? If I were really ambitious, I'd go looking for those threads, but it's allergy season and my eyes are burning. What a LYING sack of...something.
8 posted on 05/10/2002 4:48:14 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bang_list
BTTT
9 posted on 05/10/2002 4:48:52 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
So the time for pussy footing around is over. It’s time to repeal the Second Amendment. Bag it.

If what the author advocates comes to pass, then I will either be enslaved or dead.

More likely dead...with a decent kill ratio I hope.

Molon Labe.

5.56mm

10 posted on 05/10/2002 4:50:29 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Dick Meyer, a veteran political and investigative producer for CBS News, is Editorial Director of CBSNews.com based in Washington.

repeat out loud ten times: "There is no liberal bias in the media"

11 posted on 05/10/2002 4:51:38 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
CBS facilities are generally protected by armed guards.

Why is it that a corporation has rights superior to an individual in those areas where guns are restricted, e.g. New York City?

I think CBS should be totally disarmed, even prohibited from hiring armed guards, before any of their corporate pitchmen are allowed to speak on company time on the issue of guns!

12 posted on 05/10/2002 4:52:06 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
BUMP
13 posted on 05/10/2002 4:53:01 PM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Bingo

ACW II

Let's Roll

14 posted on 05/10/2002 4:54:11 PM PDT by My dog Sam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
"What the founders intended is unknowable."

Here's the homework you should have done, lefty.
What the Founding Fathers Said About the Second Amendment and Our Right to Keep and Bear Arms

15 posted on 05/10/2002 4:54:27 PM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
His Justice Department, in an extreme break from what LIBERAL judges and LIBERAL presidents have done for decades, is trying to establish that view of the Second Amendment as the law of the land in order to eventually rein in federal, state and local gun control laws.
16 posted on 05/10/2002 4:56:33 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Dan from Michigan
in order to eventually rein in federal, state and local gun control laws.

That would be nice. ;-) Psst!-->....... Fuckin' A right!!! Woo Hoo!!

18 posted on 05/10/2002 5:06:33 PM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazarus Long
I wonder if this liberal prick would have the guts to pick up a firearm if such a war ever did happen?

A war to ban guns? The irony is painful. Why are they so blind?

19 posted on 05/10/2002 5:10:38 PM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Perhaps Dick should read Article 1, Section 8 Clause 16 which states,” Congress shall have Power: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia”. That is how the militia got it’s guns, not by having people bring their own guns to a battle. And that could not mean that people kept government issued weapons, as that would be the ”privilege of the people to borrow and bear arms”.
20 posted on 05/10/2002 5:13:33 PM PDT by guitar Josh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson