Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group Sues Chocolate Manufacturers
AP via NYTimes.com ^ | 5/8/02

Posted on 05/08/2002 4:48:40 PM PDT by GeneD

Filed at 7:27 p.m. ET

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- An environmental group sued chocolate manufacturers Wednesday, contending chocolate contains potentially hazardous levels of lead and cadmium and should carry warning labels.

The suit, by the nonprofit American Environmental Safety Institute, alleges chocolate products expose consumers -- especially children -- to potentially dangerous levels of the metals.

A state investigation last year discounted the lawsuit's claims, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration researchers have found children younger than 6 who eat lots of chocolate take in 6 percent or less of the total daily amount of lead allowable by law.

An attorney for the companies named in the suit -- including Hershey Foods Corp., Nestle USA Inc., Kraft Foods North America Inc. -- said the lawsuit was baseless and an attempt to extort a settlement.

The lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court seeks in part to force the firms to include warning labels on the products under a requirement of California's Proposition 65 that individuals be warned before they are exposed to dangerous chemicals.

Scientific testing found lead and cadmium levels in products like M&Ms presented ``a clear and present danger to the health of our children,'' said Roger Carrick, an attorney for the Palo Alto-based institute.

Michele Corash, an attorney for the chocolate companies, said the two metals are present naturally in chocolate and other food but in levels too low to pose any hazard.

``We will vigorously defend the safety of our products,'' Corash said. ``But our greater concern is getting the word out that these claims are totally without basis and are just designed to scare people.''


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cadmium; chocolate; hersheyfoods; kraftfoods; lead; nestleusa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Oyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!
1 posted on 05/08/2002 4:48:40 PM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I can't think of a better death than chocolate poisoning.
2 posted on 05/08/2002 4:50:56 PM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
This suit is being funded by the Keep Our Own Kids Safe Foundation.
3 posted on 05/08/2002 4:52:26 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
ACTIVIST CASH.com
CENTER FOR THE DEFENSE OF FREE ENTERPRISE
CONSUMER FREEDOM.com

4 posted on 05/08/2002 4:55:42 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD;Cagey;SeeRushtoldU_so
OMG, not CHOCOLATE! Then I will just have to die of lead poisoning.........
5 posted on 05/08/2002 4:56:17 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Naturally! Another California initiative.
6 posted on 05/08/2002 4:56:31 PM PDT by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Did a quick seach for them and didn't find a website.

If I really need to know something about environmental health and safety, here's where I go: ACGIH.orgNo junk, just science.

7 posted on 05/08/2002 5:01:57 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I thought at first this was from The Onion. Hhhmmm...actually I was close!
8 posted on 05/08/2002 5:02:16 PM PDT by PA Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Did a quick seach for them and didn't find a website.

If I really need to know something about environmental health and safety, here's where I go: ACGIH.org

No junk, just science.

9 posted on 05/08/2002 5:02:37 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Cadmium Creme Eggs?
10 posted on 05/08/2002 5:02:43 PM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I'm suing for those hollow Easter bunnies - what a scam!
11 posted on 05/08/2002 5:03:47 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
A state investigation last year discounted the lawsuit's claims, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration researchers have found children younger than 6 who eat lots of chocolate take in 6 percent or less of the total daily amount of lead allowable by law.

Why not just sue the individual parents who give their young children so much chocolate? That would make more sense. But then, it's not about the children but about the money.

12 posted on 05/08/2002 5:04:44 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
We had a lovely family vacation at Hersheyworld last year. When you get close, you can smell the cadmium and lead in the air. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
13 posted on 05/08/2002 5:06:14 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
And to think, all this time I have been making my kids eat #2 pencils and I could have just given them Kit Kat's.
14 posted on 05/08/2002 5:08:28 PM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Although we always use the term "lead pencils," they actually do not have lead in them.
15 posted on 05/08/2002 5:10:57 PM PDT by LPStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
This needs a major BARF alert!
16 posted on 05/08/2002 5:12:04 PM PDT by hauerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LPStar
Mine do. I make them myself from tree bark and bullets.
17 posted on 05/08/2002 5:12:54 PM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Mmmmmm... cadmium crunchies and chocolate covered lead lumps are two of my favorites!
18 posted on 05/08/2002 5:15:11 PM PDT by pubmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I was listening to a representative of this group on KFI640 in Los Angeles. Basically, he was obfuscating like crazy. California law under Prop 65 requires that any item that is above 1/1000th of the dangerous level of lead be labeled as containing lead.

M&M's for example, are at about 1/333 of the allowable level. Hershey's cocoa powder is at about 1/140th the level. Technically, under California law, they are required to be labeled, but they are not actually unsafe.

There is a concern about the way cocoa is processed. One cocoa bean might have 12 times the lead as another one. The lead doesn't get into the cocoa naturally, it is harvested in latin american countries that use leaded gasoline, as well as lead based pesticides.

It is an interesting fact to know, and I would prefer a lower leaded chocolate than not, but again, these levels while "high" are considered not too harmful.

19 posted on 05/08/2002 5:19:22 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

Devil's Food


20 posted on 05/08/2002 5:22:25 PM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson