Plainfield, Indiana arab killed in crash, has three IDs and four checkbooks with different names.

WIBC-AM radio, AP ^ | May 7, 2002 | AP

[caddie]

By the Associated Press

[WIBC News] - The Indiana State Police are investigating why a man killed in a car crash was carrying three identifications and four checkbooks with different names.

Police initially thought there were two occupants in the car that crashed late Sunday, killing Q. Naim Abdullah, 24, of Plainfield.

State police troopers and volunteer firefighters searched the high weeds and mud at the scene of the crash on Interstate 65 in southern Bartholomew County, but no one else was found.

Abdulla was traveling northbound at a high rate of speed, swerved to miss a tractor trailer and lost control, striking the median and rolling the vehicle several times, police said. He was not wearing a seat belt.

The FBI assisted in determining the correct identification of the driver and notifying the family.

[null and void]

I'm still waiting for you to name that ONE Moose Limb who is willing to publicly say that 9/11 was an outrage we didn't deserve...

[Diddle E. Squat]

And how would that happen? I've never said to let one's guard down or not be vigilant. In fact quite the opposite. Trust but verify doesn't have to mean trigger-fingered slaughter.

[Tuscaloosa Goldfinch]

Re: the incident with the FBI -- in my hometown a Moslem man moved in and rented an airplane hanger to "start an airplane painting business." The FBI was informed through a policeman in a nearby larger city, and the FBI paid him a visit in helicopters.

[null and void]

GOOD! I'm glad to hear it! And relieved...

[Diddle E. Squat]

Here's a few.

[brat]

Being unPC will keep us alive!

[null and void]

An UNSIGNED letter? Close. Please play again...

[smoking camels]

I maintain, on the authorty of the Koran and the volumns of writings of the Muslim community over the years, that your friends are not true Muslims then.

True Muslims are our enemies by their own decree. If you choose to throw your lot with our enemies by your silence and approval then you will be classed with them and rightly so. I fear you are blind to this obvious fact.

Maybe YOU should do some research on the Muslim beliefs over the years including the current beliefs espoused by the leaders in America today. If you truly know the whole story you are a traitor. I do not think you know what you are talking about in spite of all your language designed to indicate otherwise.

[Diddle E. Squat]

Actually it appears to be the stance of an entire denomination, as in the leadership's position. I thought you brownshirts claimed that no Jewish, I mean Muslim, organizations had spoken out against the terroristic attacks? Isn't the collective statement of many better than that of a single Muslim? Unless you just lost two of your arguments, perhaps?

[brat]

"The sad part is that Clinton pulled a Waco, but we can't go into the mosques.".......that little irony will probably cost more American lives.

[Diddle E. Squat]

Well that is your opinion, kinda like someone claiming Catholics or Baptists are not true Christians. See post #245.

A little bit of advice: Be extremely careful how you use the term 'traitor'. It is not a term to be tossed around lightly. Here's your chance to retract it.

[null and void]

You haven't named a person. I have no evidence that this exists beyond a website.

Earlier you said you personally knew Moose Limbs who gave unequivocal condemnation of the 9/11 attacks. I asked if you could name ONE who was willing to be publicly identified with that stance.

Still, I'm willing to concede the point that my brush may be a wee bit too broad...

[null and void]

The term "traitor" requires a formal declaration of war.

Since Congress hasn't shown the testicular fortitude, and/or intellegence to recognize let alone declare a State of War, Diddly has you on a technicality...

[Diddle E. Squat]

Oh, I see what you are getting at. Sorry, but I'm not going to throw names of average, private individuals on the internet without their permission, and certainly am not going to do so in such a volatile situation(there are extremists and nutballs within the Muslim community, they just aren't the entire community). In fact it seems quite a lot of freepers choose not to put their names on the web. What I posted is the equivalent of a Catholic diocese publicly condemning the pedophilia/homosexual scandal. That would speak for many, just as the site in #245 does. Sorry if that isn't enough for you, but I've spent enough time on this topic. Likely one more response to another poster and I'm gone. Have a good evening.

[null and void]

ummm, I surrendered:

Still, I'm willing to concede the point that my brush may be a wee bit too broad...

Take care, this is going to get a lot rougher for all of us before it settles out.

[Diddle E. Squat]

Calling me a traitor, eh? I'll give smoking camel a second chance, perhaps he didn't fathom all the profound implications of that charge. As for you, having come along after such discussion: Rot in hell. You ignore parts of the constitution, I defend it. Such words could once provoke a duel. In deference to Jim Rob, I'll leave it at that.

[Cold Heat]

I asked if you could name ONE who was willing to be publicly identified with that stance.

Actually, Louis Farakkan gave a excellent statement after 9/11.(but he appears to have distanced himself from it since)

[null and void]

YIKES!!! Not at all what I meant!!! We disagree, I have moved a bit closer to your position. Please accept my appologies/regrets for having inadvertantly implied that I thought you were even boarderline shady...

[null and void]

OK. That's one!

[Diddle E. Squat]

Well I apologize for apparently misinterpreting your remarks and then exploding. Now looking back my misinterpretation certainly didn't fit the overall tone of your last posts. Obviously I consider the word 'traitor' to be one of the most powerful condemnations possible. I don't mind the disagreements and different opinions, but that word is in another league.

Again, sorry for my misread and reaction. Thanks for clarifying.

Have a good evening, and I am looking forward to future discussions.