Posted on 05/07/2002 7:02:52 AM PDT by caddie
By the Associated Press
[WIBC News] - The Indiana State Police are investigating why a man killed in a car crash was carrying three identifications and four checkbooks with different names.
Police initially thought there were two occupants in the car that crashed late Sunday, killing Q. Naim Abdullah, 24, of Plainfield.
State police troopers and volunteer firefighters searched the high weeds and mud at the scene of the crash on Interstate 65 in southern Bartholomew County, but no one else was found.
Abdulla was traveling northbound at a high rate of speed, swerved to miss a tractor trailer and lost control, striking the median and rolling the vehicle several times, police said. He was not wearing a seat belt.
The FBI assisted in determining the correct identification of the driver and notifying the family.
Personally, I'm suspicious of ANYONE carrying around multiple identities and checking accounts, and you should be too.
Gee thanks, I only live about ten miles from there.
It has only been that way since Gannet (USA Today) bought the paper. The Editorial page is still pretty conservative though.
(Piss be upon his head)
It just so happens that they all come from the middle east, they are all arab or muslim, they all believe the same political things, and, like it or not, they all look alike. It's just fact.
It does not make me a racist to see them as a such a group, as a collective enemy of the United States, because, if you listen to them, that is what they themselves say, Diddle. Not me, projecting racist sentiments on them:
Them, saying it themselves.
In 1996 Osama Bin Ladin, who is officially the Commander-in-Chief of the Taliban forces (formerly in Afghanistan, now in Pakistan, and elsewhere) declared WAR on the United States. Seemed kind of silly at the time, but, hey, he had already tried in 1996 to blow up the WTC the first time.
He was, in the week immediately prior to 9/11/2001, named the Commander-in-Chief of the Taliban (the de facto government) in Afghanistan.
The act of war that was 9/11 met all the criteria of declaring war on the United States, on behalf of all muslim people, and, starting the first battle.
Perhaps you do not recall, but, during the week of 9/11/2001, there was widespread celebration in the muslim community worldwide for our misfortune in NYC.
There never has been any significant repudiation or condemnation of the events of 9/11 by any muslim cleric, leader, president, head of state, prince, or ambassador.
That fact is utterly outrageous, but it is consistent with their self-professed beliefs.
Why should they repudiate something that they are all proud to have seen happen? That they all believe in?
Why do you have such problems understanding that this is not just a few crazy political extremists?
Why cannot you accept that the entire muslim world is in essential agreement and approval with the actions of Atta against the government and citizens of the United States, on 9/11?
Why are you incapable of perceiving this as a war, with our people and their people (the muslims) as the two combatants?
What is so difficult about this?
You are evidently in a poorly-differentiated mental fog, equating my reasonable instincts of self-defense with with German anti-Semitism in Weimar Germany, with KKK antagonism of blacks in this country in the 20s, and with the civil rights struggle of other blacks against white rednecks in the South during the 60s.
Why are you approaching this with such a PC, wimply, brainwashed, EPCOT center, "can't we all get along," mentality? It's not my fault that they are all tan-skinned arabs! It's just the way things are!
Now YOU brought up the Founding Fathers.
Did you know that Thomas Jefferson had to deal with muslims in 1804, and thereabouts, when they were terrorizing, kidnapping, and murdering innocent Americans off the Barbary Coast of Africa? The same jerks we are dealing with today, basically.
Jefferson thought that the muslims were heathens, barbaric, devoid of any gentlemanly attributes, cowards, uncivilized, pagans, and liars.
He sent a bunch of Navy and Marines to go kick the ass of the muslims. There was a famous woodcut of a brave Navy Captain Decatur, basically putting a round pistol ball through the skull of a dirtbag muslim priate, at point-blank range, on a Navy ship. (Always brings a smile to my face to see that woodcut.)
Thomas Jefferson was, I believe, signing Captain Decatur's paychecks at the time, and he ordered the action against the pirates.
True story.
Didn't Jefferson write the Declaration of Independence?
He was a Founding Father, wasn't he?
How can that be, that he was a Founding Father, but, he was also a caddie-type racist and redneck and anti-Semite, who didn't judge the muslims "one man at a time" as you would have done?
In other words, the Founding Father Jefferson and I saw eye-to-eye on the topics of the muslims.
What I see missing in your approach, is a total lack of any defensive instinct vis a vis your being a citizen of the United States.
And in the time of the Founding Fathers, it was the same way.
About a third of the people were patriots, another third were British loyalists who fled to Canada, and there was about a third of glommy people in the middle who really couldn't be bothered with the whole mess of the Revolutionary War.
So where do you fit in, Diddle?
I definitely don't see you getting too exercised about any abuses wrought by George III and his goons.
You would be all, "Don't condemn the British as a group, judge each one individually..."
Yada yada yourself."
About one week after 9/11 and a lot after then, I share that paranoia with you. I think that if and when this is over. We will see the blood money trail from the Opecker Princes to America and Americans who hate America, a lot of things will clear up!
the typical dope smoking, Koran-spouting, virgin-fantasizing, reality-challenged publicity-seeking suicide nutjob terrorist.
But thanks for the advice.
Jefferson thought that the muslims were heathens, barbaric, devoid of any gentlemanly attributes, cowards, uncivilized, pagans, and liars.
And he was correct in his thoughts.
Damn! That had never occurred to me. They run so many of the back-road motels, they could conceal *thousands* of troublemakers. Not to mention free gasoline and diesel from the "sympathetic" Quickie-Mart types. I concur, we are being set up for something really, really bad. When OBL talked about striking at Americans "in their Heartland", I did not take that to mean Manhattan.
The foreign-owned ones were run by Hindus, who are not known for their kinship with Moose Limbs...
Damn! That had never occurred to me. They run so many of the back-road motels, they could conceal *thousands* of troublemakers. Not to mention free gasoline and diesel from the "sympathetic" Quickie-Mart types. I concur, we are being set up for something really, really bad. When OBL talked about striking at Americans "in their Heartland", I did not take that to mean Manhattan.
I just hope it has occured to our intel & homeland security folks, but sadly I think they are too blinded by PC They are running around and can't find their butts with both hands. Think about it, they should have had the Anthrax terrorist in custody a long time ago. It's not like you can buy anthrax at the corner store, only a limited number of scientists have access to that.
Be prepared, keep you eyes & ears open and be armed..........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.