Forgive me if this is already posted. I did a search and couldn't find it.
1 posted on
05/07/2002 6:57:41 AM PDT by
Lucky2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: Lucky2
To: Lucky2
It is just my opinion, but to me it would almost be worth having to endure a few more years of him in order to be rid of her.
However the way things work in the real world, it is far more likely that something would happen to him, just about the time she is ready to run.
Muleboy, 20 years in Hope Arkansas and damn glad to be in Texas now.
69 posted on
05/09/2002 2:18:27 PM PDT by
muleboy
To: Lucky2
With any article that references another one, like at Newsmax or CNS, I try to track down the original source article, in this case a Liz Smith column. Sometimes they don't add to the discussion, just rereport the original article.
If the slickster did come from a lower office than VP, he would still have to go through Senate and House confirmation hearings just like Nelson Rockefeller had to do to become Ford's VP. The Democrats would have to sell their souls to get Clintoon through those, and would fail in the House hearings(if we keep around the same number of seats we do now). So unless Bubba was elected as VP, (which he couldn't do) he most likely still couldn't get in.
To: Lucky2
The gossip columnist and "many others," she says, already believe the 22nd Amendment is unconstitutional. Gee, it's in the Constitution, it was legally ratified, so by definition IT'S CONSTITUTIONAL.
75 posted on
05/09/2002 2:53:08 PM PDT by
Junior
To: Lucky2
The lefties are jerking our chains again. They don't read the Constitution, they have never read it, they just say what they want and..pooof..it's in the Constitution. I should know, I debate these fools enough to know. Even when you show them the actual words upon which you are debating they will just stick up their arrogant noses and say, "Well, that's not what it means", as if there is some mystic meaning beyond what is factually stated. These people are dilusional, I've learned to let them ramble on, and on until I have so much overwhelming evidence of their lies I can destroy them with a 30 second, factual, rebuttal.
I've gone through this argument with lefties before. Their last argument is always "Well, who's going to stop it". Standard answer: THE SUPREME COURT OF THESE HERE UNITED STATES, THAT'S WHO....EVER HEARD OF THEM? Ignore the lefties, they need to take a strong dose of "salts" and spend some time in the outhouse and they'll be fine.
78 posted on
05/09/2002 3:07:21 PM PDT by
timydnuc
To: Lucky2
All things being equal, I'd much prefer another 4 years of Bill than two weeks of Hillary in the White House.
To: Lucky2
As you must know, Dickie Morris said that Hitlery will be prez in 2004, so if BJC is VP and if she later suffers from arkancide, he would be prez and we would be toast. Can Dickie be wrong?
To: Lucky2
The whole idea is a lefty pipedream.
Here's another fly in the ointment.
Article. 2.
Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
bill was impeached for purjuy (a felony), not removed from office.
bill was found guilty by the judge in Arkansas of perjury and was disbarred and payed a hefty fine, and was darn lucky he didn't get 5 years in jail.(only the judge's respect for the Office of the Presidency prevented it).
Impeached and convicted of a felony would be a tough hurdle to shrug off, and hillary ain't stupid enough to tie this albatros around her neck, she's got enough political baggage of her own without borrowing any of bill's.
To: Lucky2
So, if the death of ONE of them is good...wouldn't the death of BOTH of them be even better??
To: Lucky2
I have mixed emotions.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson