Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Linux good. Microsoft bad.
1 posted on 05/06/2002 12:57:31 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum
Now you've gone and done it; B2K will have his panties in a wad over this.

Beware: Incoming M$ boilerplate / talking points / seminar caller, FUDraking.

2 posted on 05/06/2002 1:02:50 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I LIKE Microsoft products. But if I was doing IT for a government that had legitimate concerns about security, I would use Linux and other open source products, and I would be very careful about auditing every bit of code used in my networks. And I would monitor my firewalls (also open source) very carefully. And I would set up a "honeynet" to snag foreign 3l33t HaX0rz. And I would generate lots of disinformation.

And I would still worry. But using closed-source systems in sensitive government work is just nuts.

3 posted on 05/06/2002 1:09:35 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Microsoft can afford to lose the Peruvian market. What, a hundred copies tops?...

Can Peru afford to be without the de-facto standard? It is to laugh.

Were I Bill G., I'd simply stop selling any software to Peru.

4 posted on 05/06/2002 5:33:29 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson