Skip to comments.
MS in Peruvian open-source nightmare
The Register ^
| 05/05/2002
| Thomas C. Greene
Posted on 05/06/2002 12:57:30 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
There's a letter circulating, purportedly from Peruvian Congressman David Villanueva Nuñez to Microsoft Peru, which cuts the heart out of Redmond's chief 'panic points' to chill those considering open-source migration.
Apparently, the Peruvian government is considering a bill mandating open-source software for all public bureaux. From the congressman's letter, we gather that MS had circulated a FUD communiqué calculated to frighten world + dog with images of collapsing domestic software markets, spiraling costs and systems migration nightmares. Villanueva Nuñez slices and dices with great skill to reveal the internal inconsistencies, unsupportable claims and irrational conclusions which the MS flacks trade in.
The letter provides the most thoughtful and thorough rebuttal we've ever seen to Microsoft's standard open-source terror boilerplate.
Click here for full article
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: microsoft; opensourcesoftware
Linux good. Microsoft bad.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Now you've gone and done it; B2K will have his panties in a wad over this.
Beware: Incoming M$ boilerplate / talking points / seminar caller, FUDraking.
2
posted on
05/06/2002 1:02:50 PM PDT
by
AFreeBird
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I LIKE Microsoft products. But if I was doing IT for a government that had legitimate concerns about security, I would use Linux and other open source products, and I would be very careful about auditing every bit of code used in my networks. And I would monitor my firewalls (also open source) very carefully. And I would set up a "honeynet" to snag foreign 3l33t HaX0rz. And I would generate lots of disinformation.
And I would still worry. But using closed-source systems in sensitive government work is just nuts.
3
posted on
05/06/2002 1:09:35 PM PDT
by
eno_
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Microsoft can afford to lose the Peruvian market. What, a hundred copies tops?...
Can Peru afford to be without the de-facto standard? It is to laugh.
Were I Bill G., I'd simply stop selling any software to Peru.
4
posted on
05/06/2002 5:33:29 PM PDT
by
boris
To: eno_
"But using closed-source systems in sensitive government work is just nuts."
Spoken like someone who hasn't been there.
To: PatrioticAmerican
I have been there. The rules are different for the U.S. Many of teh most important software companies are based here and run by U.S. nationals. If anyone inserted spyware in products sold to the U.S. government and it caused a security breach, the consequences are clear. For foreign governments, the rules, the tools, and the consequences are different.
6
posted on
05/07/2002 6:56:57 AM PDT
by
eno_
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson