Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Connecticut has long-standing issues on race in the public schools, whether it be of the students or of the teachers. This is a continuation of a seemingly never-ending saga. As long as democraps control the legislature, we will never get anywhere.
1 posted on 05/01/2002 5:57:51 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LurkedLongEnough
“I see affirmative action as allowing you to set aside a spot for a minority candidate that is qualified versus hiring the person with the highest qualifications regardless of their race,”

This is one of the usual methods the left uses to justify violating the Constitution, to wit: lower the minimum requirements for a teacher, an applicant for college, or a contractor seeking a state job. Once the minimums are set, treat everyone who achieves such a minimum as equal,i.e., make the minimum a threshhold and all who surpass it are the same. Here's how the "logic" works in practice:

College entrance administrators often use a combined score to rank prospective applicants. This score is a mathematical combination of high school grades and SAT results. Using the combined score, each candidate is given a rating from 1 to 100. Suppose the majority of white and Asian applicants are ranked between 95 and 98, and the majority of black, Hispanic, and Native American applicants are ranked between 82 and 85. In the interests of the great God of diversity, the admissions committee merely has to agree that all students with a weighted score of 82 or higher will have passed the first cutoff. From that point, they can use "other" criteria to determine who actually gets admitted. The other criteria invariably includes a racial component, which allows about 10 to 15% of the entering class to be comprised of blacks and Hispanics, nearly all of whom had inferior qualifications to whites and Asians who were denied admission. This is democracy in action. </sarcasm>

2 posted on 05/01/2002 6:28:00 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LurkedLongEnough
and how does this help?
3 posted on 05/01/2002 6:29:32 AM PDT by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LurkedLongEnough
As long as democraps control the legislature, we will never get anywhere.

Better get comfortable :^)

4 posted on 05/01/2002 7:08:29 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: #1CTYankee; .303 Brit; 2nd amendment mama; 2Trievers; AGBRUHN; always vigilant; Andonius_99...
CT Bump!

If any one would like to be removed from my CT Bump list, please let me know and it will be done ASAP. Conversely, if you would like to be added the same holds true.

5 posted on 05/01/2002 7:09:47 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Ah, Konnecticut.
I just read in yesterdays CT Post that the CT Congressional Minority Caucas rejected a slew of the Governors judicial nominees because they were not of the right "makeup"
One Dem. state Senator acknowledged that they were all very qualified, but voted to reject them because they were, um, not minorities! (At least he was honest about it).
Oh, the lunatics are surely running the asylum.
6 posted on 05/01/2002 7:12:22 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LurkedLongEnough
As long as democraps control the legislature, we will never get anywhere.

Before that idiotic "one man, one vote" ruling, I have been told that the Connecticut state constitution allowed each town a maximum of three representatives. As a result, the legislature used to be about 70% Republican at times when voter registration was 65% Democrat.

7 posted on 05/01/2002 7:22:41 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Board member J.R. Mitchell said the board needs to know if the community wants to move toward affirmative action instead of hiring the top candidates regardless of race.

Good move, actually. Mitchell is throwing down the gauntlet and daring the black leaders and the liberals to come out and admit they want affirmative action instead of a fair, quality-based hiring system. They'll get it and suffer the degradation of the school system's quality but hey, everyone involved will feeeeel soooo much better and the kids? Tough luck, junior. It's skin color that counts, get it? He will.

This is Connecticut, folks.

8 posted on 05/01/2002 7:39:13 AM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LurkedLongEnough
“I see affirmative action as allowing you to set aside a spot for a minority candidate that is qualified versus hiring the person with the highest qualifications regardless of their race,” Mitchell said Monday.

“Is the minority community saying they want us to give greater weight to a minority candidate? I would look forward to hearing what direction they want us to go in.’’

HAHAHAAA!
Dr. Martin Luther King would be very proud, LOL!!!

Actually, it's only Connecticut and that place is pretty much down the scumbag liberal toilet anyway, isn't it? They may as well hire nothing but minority teachers - - why hire only the best? Skin color, after all, is far more important than the "highest qualifications". It's perfectly okay to discriminate against white teachers, because they are - - white.
Yes, Dr. King would be very proud indeed. What a proud, proud group they have there in Connecticut. Hahahahaa...

11 posted on 05/01/2002 9:05:11 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson