Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Old ways die hard
US News and World Report ^ | Web exclusive 4/19/02 | By Michael Barone

Posted on 04/29/2002 10:50:37 AM PDT by vannrox

Old ways die hard


Bilingual education is still alive and well in Santa Ana, Calif.




By Michael Barone


How would you feel if you were told that your kindergartner was assigned to a classroom in which instruction is given entirely in Spanish, even though he doesn't understand a word of the language? And if you were told, further, that your local elementary school does not have any English-language instruction in kindergarten and grades one through three?


You would probably react pretty much the same way that Veronica Gonzalez and Stephanie Daniel did when faced with just that situation in Edison School in the Santa Ana Unified School District in Orange County, Calif. Gonzalez is a third-generation and Daniel a third-generation American; both speak fluent English and little or no Spanish.


And both were outraged. "On the first day, the teacher was speaking Spanish," Gonzalez told a group of parents who gathered to discuss the issue in a neat, wrought-iron-fenced, American-flag-flying Santa Ana neighborhood. "Homework was assigned in Spanish. They were singing songs in Spanish." Added Daniel: "On papers they sent home, the directions were in Spanish. My son knows the months of the year in Spanish, and 'Happy Birthday.' "


All this, even though, says Gonzalez, "We requested an all-English class ... .I went up to my son's kindergarten teacher. She told me that there were no English-only classes in the school. 'If you want one, go to another school.' "


That was not so easy. Transfers to schools offering English-language instruction were turned down; they were outside the zone. Parents who want their children to go to the so-called fundamental school line up to wait overnight outside the school district headquarters to try to get a spot. Parents can get transfers if their child has a sibling in another school, but that leaves many out.


The problem is a personal one for Veronica Gonzalez and Stephanie Daniel, and seems to raise only local issues.


Yet it's also a situation with national implications. In the 2000 census, more than 1 in 6 people under 18 living in the United States were classified as Hispanic–a census-created category with no rigorous definition that is based on self- (or parent) classification.


Many of these children are the sons and daughters of recent immigrants who speak little or no English; others, like Gonzalez's son, are the sons and daughters of multigenerational American citizens who speak little or no Spanish.


For three decades many of these children were shunted into so-called bilingual education classes, with instruction primarily or exclusively in Spanish, for as long as three, five, or even seven years.


The result has been that many Hispanic children have not mastered English sufficiently well to qualify for higher education or good jobs. Some have been separated from the larger American culture and the opportunities it offers.


This practice was supposed to stop in California after voters in June 1998 passed Proposition 227, which limited Spanish-language instruction to one year unless parents sought and received waivers.


But some districts, like Santa Ana Unified, have resisted and undermined 227.


Santa Ana has symbolic importance here: It is one of the most heavily Hispanic enclaves in the United States. Santa Ana's population of 338,000 in the 2000 census was 76 percent Hispanic; the student body in the school district is 92 percent Hispanic.


The apparent culprit in Santa Ana is local political operator Nativo Lopez, elected school board president by a narrow margin in 2000.


Gloria Matta Tuchman, cochairman of the drive that led to passage of Proposition 227 and a Santa Ana teacher herself, tells the story: "Following the passage of Prop. 227, we have school board member Nativo Lopez holding parent meetings at school sites, telling parents about the merits of bilingual education and convincing them to request parental waivers for this program. We have had the majority of the Santa Ana School Board members allowing him to conduct such meetings, even though it might be viewed as unethical and coercion of parents." The number of bilingual students in Orange County, which fell from 17,180 to 6,954 in one year after the passage of 227, has now risen to 7,982, with 6,302 of them in Santa Ana Unified.


A new principal in Edison, according to the parents at the recent meeting, increased the number of Spanish-language classes and reduced the number of English-language classes and called parents repeatedly to ask them to sign waivers to keep their children in Spanish-language classes. Evidently, Lopez is determined to strengthen Latino identity, though he has a rather odd concept of it; he accused school board member Rosemarie Avila of not being a Latina because she is partly of German descent, even though she was born in Guatemala and many Latin Americans have ancestors who were from countries other than Spain (the No. 1 example: Mexico's President Vicente Fox).


Vivian Martinez, who organized the parents' meeting, tells of other problems. "Our good teachers, the experienced teachers, are leaving the school because they're so upset," she complains. "Many of our teachers now have emergency credentials."


She says that in 1999 Lopez said that he would get rid of Anglos in the system. And, Gonzalez says: "Last night he said he would get Spanish at the junior high schools and high schools." Her husband adds, "They [the kids] will get jobs in the fields or in the car wash."


The parents have other complaints. Beatriz Salas, a 1999 immigrant from Mexico City, was not able to get her teenage son in special-education classes. She says that Lopez offered to help her in 1999 if she agreed to join his organization, Hermandad Mexicana, and get others to attend its demonstrations. Tony Garcia, a recent Santa Ana High School graduate, was harassed by school administrators after he refused, as student body president, to sign blank purchase orders. Lopez and Hermandad have a fragrant past.


Hermandad was accused of vote fraud in the closely contested 1996 congressional election between Republican Robert Dornan and Democrat Loretta Sanchez, and, in 1997, some $500,000 of Hermandad's government funds were unaccounted for.


Martinez and the other parents have responded to what they regard as bad public policy the old-fashioned American way–politics. They have launched a recall drive against Nativo Lopez. They need 8,600 signatures from Santa Ana's 57,000 registered voters to get the recall on the ballot in November, and then they have to beat Lopez and Hermandad. It's by no means clear whether they'll succeed.


But the fact that Hispanic parents in one of America's most heavily Hispanic cities have gone to such lengths–have taken on a powerful and adept local political boss–to oppose bilingual education is evidence that at least some Hispanic parents oppose bilingual education and Spanish-language instruction. The Hispanic organizations–many of them with no significant membership and financed largely by establishment foundations that support bilingual education and try to keep American children in Spanish-language instruction as long as possible–might do well to take a trip to Santa Ana.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bilingual; education; language; law; noncompliance; reform; tax; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2002 10:50:37 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Bttt. Got rope?
2 posted on 04/29/2002 10:57:54 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Corruption is the norm in the Latino ethic. This should not be a surprise.

It's not a coincidence that South American officials are some of the most corrupt in the world (of course, being that they are politicians....that's not saying much)

3 posted on 04/29/2002 10:58:01 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This can't be true. The open borders crowd say they assimilate.
4 posted on 04/29/2002 11:05:11 AM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
"Corruptions is the norm in the latino ethic?"

Are you really a de-barred attorney with eight marijuana convictions?

Quite a credential for an expert on corruption.

5 posted on 04/29/2002 11:08:20 AM PDT by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AzJP
Very good AzJP. Sheesh! V's wife.
6 posted on 04/29/2002 11:18:09 AM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Here are three personal examples of bi-lingual education.

My ultra-liberal sister lives in the wine country of Kalifornia and there are lots of migrant workers whose kids go to school up there. She thought having my nephew in a bi-lingual class would help him learn Spanish when he first started school. She said that at the end of the year, the spanish-speaking kids spoke only spanish and hung out together and the english-speaking kids spoke only english and hung out together. Each group learned little, if any, of the other language.

Seems to me that learning the language of the country you're living in will be a huge advantage to these kids. When my son was in kindergarten, a little boy came from Japan in January and spoke no english at all. At the end of the school year, he spoke perfect english with no accent and played with all the kids.

This year my son is in 3rd grade and a little girl from Japan started the year not speaking any english. The japanese boy from his kndergarten class has been helping her and she now speaks perfect english with no accent.

7 posted on 04/29/2002 11:28:06 AM PDT by TMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Every liberal is a child-abusing thug.
8 posted on 04/29/2002 11:36:15 AM PDT by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"How would you feel if you were told that your kindergartner was assigned to a classroom in which instruction is given entirely in Spanish, even though he doesn't understand a word of the language? "

If I had smuggled myself and my kids into Mexico City, and they didn't speak Spanish, I would probably be very afraid that the Mexican police would catch and deport us !
... or deport them and jail me !

9 posted on 04/29/2002 11:45:42 AM PDT by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AzJP
Pot smoking is a personal thing. Payoffs and bribery are of a different order......par for the course in the Latin business community.

I would defend the rights of anyone who chooses to use substances in their own homes.

10 posted on 04/29/2002 11:48:10 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TMD
Little ones learn languages quickly and that's the way it should work. I heard of one play school which had kids speaking at least three languages at the beginning of the year and each kid was tri-lingual at the end of the year.

No favors are done for Spanish speakers by keeping them in Spanish only classes. They can learn English easily and quickly by "total immersion". Likewise, they can be a benefit for English only speakers who are immersed in Spanish classes. There is lemonade to be made here.

11 posted on 04/29/2002 11:49:43 AM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AzJP
The logical fallacy demonstrated by your response is ad hominem, an attack against the person rather than the position.

I doubt you will find any serious scholar or person who would dispute the fact that corruption, especially petty corruption in everyday life, is endemic in Latin America, part of the woof and warp of the culture. It is not endemic in North America above the Rio Grande, nor is it endemic in Scandanavia, the British Isles, the Low Countries, German or Switzerland, and perhaps France and Austria. Japan is not corrupt. Italy and Spain are notoriously corrupt, as are the Balkan countries. Indeed, once you leave my short list of countries, corruption is more the rule than the exception.

12 posted on 04/29/2002 11:51:01 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zarf
It's not a coincidence that South American officials are some of the most corrupt in the world .....

They have learned well from their North American cousins ;-)

13 posted on 04/29/2002 11:54:11 AM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
The logical fallacy you employ is one of sweeping generalization. If the socialism of Scandinavia, the introduction of communism in Russia and its grip on much of eastern Europe, as well as the rise of every kind of union to power under the aegis of the democratic party in the good ole USA isn't indicative that graft and corruption are equal opportunity employers, I don't know what is.V's wife.
14 posted on 04/29/2002 11:59:43 AM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TMD
Sounds like your sister is in Healdsburg.

In our Greenwich, Connecticut schools we have had many Japanese kids as well as some Hispanics. The Japanese kids almost all learn English within a year, and many of them integrate very well. The ones here for high school do well and most have as many American friends as Japanese. They move in what one might describe as 'normal' student circles: not the most elite or athletic cliques, but not as loners or outcasts. The Hispanics tend to have difficulty in school, with English and generally, and to limit their social integration to groups known locally as "ghetto," primarily black and hispanic kids (and white gangsta wannabes) who engage in socially unacceptable behaviors concerning drugs, sex, dress, smoking, scholastic achievement (or lack thereof), etc.

15 posted on 04/29/2002 12:01:57 PM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ventana
Generalizations? Sure, one can hardly do otherwise here on FR. Sweeping or unjustified generalization? I think not.

I pointedly left Eastern Europe and Russia off my list, as they are rather corrupt societies.

While I agree with you about the corrupting effects of socialism on the soul and the body politic, my experience has been an almost total absense of personal corruption in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. Although few of them are believing Lutherans anymore, the personal rectititude of the Protestant ethic still seems pervasive.

16 posted on 04/29/2002 12:05:54 PM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Let me be more specific. IMHO, when an attorney is admitted to a state bar, that attorney declares adherence to the laws of that state. At least in the states I know.

An attorney with eight strikes of a relatively simple type does not convey to me a strong posture of conforming to the bahavior standards of that community.

If ya' don't like the rules, don't raise your right hand taking allegiance, and then go out and break 'em, often. If you wanna' do your own thing, cool, but I don't have much respect for talking one way and walking another.

If that fits your ad hominem, so be it. If my assessment of the lawyer's background is accurate, I still question his standards of measuring ethics.

On your geographic examples, I've traveled enough to think that none of your groupings are monolithic. Exceptions at all extremes, very flat bell-curves.

Personally, I've got business partners, family friends, three generations, spread over much of northern Mexico. The mutual trust is monumental.

To me "endemic" etc. is not a basis for a group generalization. Opining a trait as endemic is not the same as ascribing a trait to the entire generalized group.

IMHO

17 posted on 04/29/2002 12:13:53 PM PDT by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: varon
Oh yes, and made it a fine art!!

Actually you can trace it back to the Spanish. Spain did quite a bit of damage as it cut it's colonial swath through South, Central and North America.

18 posted on 04/29/2002 12:14:08 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
No personal corruption there? Ha, they lead the way in euthanasia, teen suicide, they have had overt acceptance of pornagraphy for years. They have incredibly high divorce rates. When they are not divorcing they are cohabitating and bearing huge numbers of out of wedlock babies. They have virtually no church attendance thus the only social good done on an organzized basis comes through the state, and, well, you know how that goes. Child porn has been a much bigger problem there for years (in Scandinavia). You could hardly call them innovative societies( well, ok there's Nokia). They are big nanny states, yechhh! V's wife.
19 posted on 04/29/2002 12:14:11 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: zarf
It also got the natives to stop those charming practices like live human sacrifice with the ritual cutting of the hearts out. Yes, those Spanish, savages. V's wife.
20 posted on 04/29/2002 12:15:24 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson