Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George, Why Don't You Sit This One Out? - Bush's political machine is ruffling local GOP feathers
BusinessWeek (subscriber only) ^ | May 6, 2002 | Alexandra Starr

Posted on 04/29/2002 9:53:02 AM PDT by Incorrigible

BusinessWeek

MAY 6, 2002

GOVERNMENT


George, Why Don't You Sit This One Out?
Bush's political machine is ruffling local GOP feathers

 

With few exceptions, conservatives are wild about President Bush, who sports a 97% approval rating among the rank and file. But his political team's heavy-handed tactics in the 2002 elections are beginning to raise hackles in the hinterland. In particular, activists on the Right are upset the White House is pushing conservatives aside and anointing moderates to headline the GOP ticket this fall, flouting the Republican principle of local control in the process.

In an attempt to recapture the Senate in November, Bush political strategist Karl Rove and his young lieutenants have focused on influencing the selection of GOP nominees in toss-up states. They are also swinging their weight around in House and gubernatorial contests--jawboning weak sisters, paying off the campaign debts of dropouts, and making their choices oh-so-obvious.

Case in point: When the President went to Georgia earlier this year to campaign for Senate hopeful Representative Saxby Chambliss over former legislator Bob Irvin, state Representative Fran Millar took offense. "It's the people of Georgia, not the White House, who should be deciding on the nominee," he and 18 other state legislators wrote to Rove and White House Director of Political Affairs Ken Mehlman.

In recent months, the not-so-invisible hand of Rove & Co. has not only beckoned candidates into races but also pushed others out of primary battles. Vice-President Dick Cheney called Minnesota House Majority Leader Tim Pawlenty and urged him to abandon a Senate bid so that centrist Norm Coleman, the former mayor of St. Paul, could get an early start against ultraliberal Democratic Senator Paul D. Wellstone. Republican oligarchs also shoved conservative former Maryland GOP chair Ellen Sauerbrey out of a House race in suburban Baltimore in favor of pro-labor moderate Helen D. Bentley. And they persuaded former Charlotte Mayor Richard Vinroot to abandon a Senate primary contest against Elizabeth Dole in North Carolina. A few weeks later, the Republican National Committee sent him $200,000 to retire campaign debt.

Perhaps the biggest White House coup thus far was getting Representative John R. Thune of South Dakota to forgo a gubernatorial run and challenge Democratic Senator Tim Johnson instead. The race has become a proxy for a potential Presidential face-off between Bush and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) in 2004. What's more, in the primary to replace Thune, the Bushies prevailed upon popular Governor William Janklow to run against ex-Senator Larry Pressler, whom they consider a weaker choice. "We're looking for the best possible candidate," says Mehlman. "Not who wants to run, not who is next in line to run, but the best possible person."

Mehlman and RNC Deputy Chair Jack Oliver, both thirtysomething veterans of the Bush 2000 campaign, are on the forefront of this wheat-and-chaff operation. Yet even Mehlman's vaunted efficiency and Oliver's thick Rolodex were no match for quirky California. Despite the White House's seal of approval, former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan lost the Mar. 5 gubernatorial primary to financier Bill Simon. And therein lies the danger of choosing candidates from afar: Unless Bush's picks win, there is likely to be lingering ill will among local GOP organizations.

Mindful of the high stakes, the White House is going full bore to get the anointed elected. Bush has crisscrossed the country to stump for hopefuls and simultaneously flog his policy proposals, a twofer that has raised Democratic eyebrows. "The White House bootstraps an alleged policy event onto these blatantly political trips so the taxpayer picks up the bill," grouses Jim Jordan, executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

The chosen, however, are grateful for the attention and cash Bush's visits provide. The White House "is always trying to maximize opportunities for you to appear with the President and showcase you as a candidate," says Representative Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who is trying to replace retiring Senator Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.).

In its quest to regain the Senate, Rove & Co. is leaving nothing to chance. On the day the South Dakota Fraternal Order of Police opted to endorse Democrat Johnson over Thune, Mehlman called the organization four times to urge it to reconsider. And when Housing & Urban Development Secretary Mel Martinez visited Minnesota, Mehlman made sure there were plenty of photo ops with Representative Mark Kennedy (R-Minn.). Kennedy won by just 155 votes in 2000 and faces a Democratic incumbent this year because of redistricting. "Mehlman doesn't focus his time on friends of the President who probably wouldn't need his support," says Kennedy. "He focuses on keeping the majority in the House and regaining the Senate."

While Mehlman, 35, closely monitors grassroots developments, Oliver, 33, fills candidates' campaign coffers. Oliver, who ran John D. Ashcroft's Presidential campaign before raising record amounts of cash for Bush, has used his national contacts to narrow the funding gap between Republican challengers and their incumbent Democratic foes. What's more, he helps smooth feathers ruffled by the GOP leaders' tough tactics. "He's young, but he has the kind of personality where he can pick up the phone and repair the damage when I've severed ties," says National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.).

For now, Davis and his White House allies show no signs of tempering their aggressive strategy. "Local parties don't always nominate the strongest candidates," Davis insists.

Still, irking grassroots Republicans could come back to haunt the Administration. The Christian Right is already critical of Bush's tougher line on Israel. And it is the base that generally votes in midterm elections--not moderates and independents. If the faithful are so disenchanted with their standard-bearer that they stay away from the polls in the fall, that could cost the GOP seats in a tight election. In fact, Bush could come to wonder if it might not have been better to live with local control--whatever the outcome.


By Alexandra Starr in Washington

Not for commercial use.  For educational and discussion purposes only.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: jackoliver; karlrove; kenmehlman
This is the second time BusinessWeak has run an article on this subject.
1 posted on 04/29/2002 9:53:02 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
"Local parties don't always nominate the strongest candidates," Davis insists.

And the political process doesn't necessarily produce candidates who respect the will of the people.

2 posted on 04/29/2002 9:59:11 AM PDT by joeyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Of course, if Bush was doing nothing for local candidates, he would have been criticized for that, too.
3 posted on 04/29/2002 10:00:30 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Wasn't Larry Pressler very very pro-Second Amendment?
4 posted on 04/29/2002 10:03:57 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
I agree with the democrat,I did'nt like paying for Clintoon flying around the country campaigning on my dollar and I don't like it when Bush does it either,they could at least make a half assed attempt like Hillary did and pay for the cost of the damn tickets.
5 posted on 04/29/2002 10:04:18 AM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
And they persuaded former Charlotte Mayor Richard Vinroot to abandon a Senate primary contest against Elizabeth Dole in North Carolina. A few weeks later, the Republican National Committee sent him $200,000 to retire campaign debt.

North Carolina has two statewide officeholders and the retiring Helms is one of them. There are plenty of offices for Vinroot and others to run for this year and in coming years. In fact, I'd bet $100 that Edwards is done with the Senate and will leave in 2004 whatever becomes of his presidential bid (his voting record is completely out of touch with North Carolinians and he's been spending gobs of money and time criss-crossing the country for his WH bid)-- leaving that Senate seat open. He can then raise money for Democrats in preparation for a 2008 open race or he can join the Democrat Cabinet.

The Christian Right is already critical of Bush's tougher line on Israel. And it is the base that generally votes in midterm elections--not moderates and independents. If the faithful are so disenchanted with their standard-bearer that they stay away from the polls in the fall, that could cost the GOP seats in a tight election.

Then they deserve Hillary in 2004, too. I have no patience for stupid people. They can spite their faces all they want. They shouldn't be surprised what becomes of their tantrum.

On the day the South Dakota Fraternal Order of Police opted to endorse Democrat Johnson over Thune...

Why does the FOP support Democrats? Is it just a union thing? The money they get from D. C.?

6 posted on 04/29/2002 10:19:57 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
'This is the second time BusinessWeak has run an article on this subject.'

Yep. It is no coinky dink that, in the main, it is the Clymers in the leftstream presstitution racket that reports on GOP "discord". Look for lots more as November approaches....

7 posted on 04/29/2002 10:19:58 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
"Not who wants to run, not who is next in line to run, but the best possible person."

Best possible person for what putting the NWO into place, dissovling our borders, sucking up to terrorists, placing U.N. rules and regulations over our communities and land, fast track treaties that entangle us even more in sovereignty destroying trade deals? No thanks.

Conservatives in the GOP from California to Main have been throughly ran over by the Bush machine. That Compassionate Conservative bull. Compassionate to everyone BUT conservatives and natural born American citizens.

Rove's crew have even suggested that those that don't like the "Big Tent" can leave, so I did. I will be writing in my candidate until Bush and RINO's like him are outta there.

8 posted on 04/29/2002 10:23:21 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Pressler lost to the guy viewed as the weakest Democrat senator this cycle. He lost to that guy while running as the incumbent. He should be happy to get County Lincoln Day Dinner invites. Being pro-2A means nothing if you can't actually win a race.
9 posted on 04/29/2002 10:23:35 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Forgive Rove for believing that relying upon a strategy of limiting to whatever extent possible the turnout of blacks and Hispanics to win races is stupid-- especially since whites are becoming less and less a majority racial group in the U. S. He's just trying to hold the inevitable off for as long as he can. If the GOP can't convert these two groups, they are an extinct party. So is the Constitution Party and any other party you might prefer over the GOP. When a racial group votes 90-9 (blacks) or 62-35 (hispanics) or 55-41 (asians) against you, your days of electoral success are numbered. If you convert them, conservatives will easily win races.
10 posted on 04/29/2002 10:33:36 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
I am surprised some people still think Geo W. is a conservative, he is not and never was, neither was his dad. There is a very thin line between Bush and Liberal demcraps. IN Fact he has done more for the liberal democraps than Clinton was able to do. I will never vote for another Bush in my lifetime.
11 posted on 04/29/2002 10:46:00 AM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
Your post #5, who are you trying to kid. Hillary said she was going to pay the price of coach tickets while she sprinted around in ultra class military jets. I am not surprised she never paid anything, nor did she return any of the illgotten campaign donations like she said she was going to do. That was Clinton way, just say it and people think it has been done. Appearantly some do believe, just like you did.
12 posted on 04/29/2002 10:54:12 AM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
They forgot one. The U.S. Senate race in Tennessee. Before the words could barely pop out of Fred Thompsons mouth the White House tried to annoint Lamar Alexander to run in his place. This despite the fact four others including at least two more conservative congressmen and others were aviable. Bush want's Daddys friend Alexander in office despite the fact it has never been accomplished in Tennessee history. No after the fact governor has been elected to the senate by the vote of the people. Very few if any in the 1900's won any other offices at all. Is putting a F.O.D. {Friend Of Dad's} in office to him more important than putting much needed conservatives into the weakened liberal leaning senate?

Bryant would make a far better senator than Alexander. Alexander by any definition is a moderate. He had his chances. As well he is a known State Income Tax shill which will further hurt him. What they support on a state level they will support national. Bryant has proven he is worthy for the job. Change must come in the senate. If a conservative can be put in then do it. It's stupid not too even try. It'[s the same thing in the GOP. Conservatives are told to vote and not be heard. Just show up for elections is the deal.

13 posted on 04/29/2002 10:55:27 AM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
IN Fact he has done more for the liberal democraps than Clinton was able to do.

Yes and some in the GOP is still clueless as to why he has such high approval ratings. So did his friend Don Sundquist. In his second term Sundquist endorsed virtually every DEM idea put before him. Where is Tennessee now? In bad shape it seems. Sundquist managed to split the GOP in half. Half our leglislature are party blind loyal idiots who being good Republicans won't vote against him no matter what. The other half the GOP conservatives are the ones trying to do right. The Dems are having a field day with it.

14 posted on 04/29/2002 11:02:03 AM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: GraniteStateConservative
This is suppose to impress conservatives, flood us with more third world trough eaters instead of putting a stop to it? Oh please, if this is the case and natural born "minorities" do not have the snap to realize their freedoms are on the line, then I'll count on writing in my candidate for the next couple of decades, because what the Republicans are saying is, "We give up, we are useless, we are going left".

I will only vote for those that represent my views, and now is the critical time to do that, Tancredo or no one in 2004.

16 posted on 04/29/2002 11:20:09 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
This sort of thing is not only wrong in principle, it is just plain stupid. This article will cost all Republicans some votes.

But one cannot say enough about what a political incompetent is Karl Rove. In my opinion, he almost single-handedly cost Bush the last election. He has no comprehension of how to motivate normal people. (See Politics 2001--Lessons 2000.)

It really does ill-behoove Republicans to try to ape FDR's efforts in the 1930s to centrally control the Democratic Party. That is not the American way--although I cannot deny that this is not the first time the Republicans have tried it.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

17 posted on 04/29/2002 11:29:19 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
"Local parties don't always nominate the strongest candidates," Davis insists

No .. a central Republican committee of wealthy white men in blue blazers are the ones who nominate the strongest candidates.

Sheesh ... is this what the GOP has been reduced to?

18 posted on 04/29/2002 1:32:07 PM PDT by JoeMomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
I don't know how many converts you'll get referring to black people as "Negroes"-- as that link did.
19 posted on 04/29/2002 1:51:54 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson