Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush administration backs monuments [designated by Clinton]
the Oregonian ^ | 25 Apr 02 | MICHELLE COLE

Posted on 04/25/2002 2:51:35 PM PDT by Glutton

The Bush administration will not challenge 17 national monuments that former President Clinton designated, including the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument in Southern Oregon.

Instead, the Interior Department announced plans Wednesday to proceed with management plans that will guide the myriad activities on monument lands, including recreation, road closures, grazing and fire suppression.

Agency officials promised that the plans would be developed with "maximum input" from local residents, many of whom complained bitterly about being ignored when the monuments were established.

"While I share concerns about the way in which these monuments were created, it's our job now to see that we develop land-use plans in an open, inclusive and comprehensive way," Interior Secretary Gale Norton said Wednesday.

Citing its ecological and geological treasures, Clinton designated 52,947 acres of federally owned land near Ashland as the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument in June 2000. The federal Bureau of Land Management was ready to release a Cascade-Siskiyou draft management plan last spring when Norton ordered it held pending comment by state and local officials.

Clinton's proclamation establishing the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument withdrew the area from further mineral exploration, prohibited logging except for ecological restoration, closed a road used by all-terrain vehicles and launched a study of the impact of grazing.

Elsewhere in the West, newly designated monuments have sparked hot debate about mining, natural gas, geothermal energy development and off-road vehicle use.

Oregon conservationists were dismayed last summer when Jackson County commissioners sent Norton a proposal to shrink the monument to 16,580 acres. They said that would address concerns of property owners who hold a checkerboard of private lands inside the monument boundaries.

Conservationists continued to voice concern Wednesday, although the administration said it has no plans to shrink the monument.

"We believe they're going to give county commissioners a special place at the table and a special ear to a minority of folks who were and are against protection of these monuments," said Dave Willis of the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council.

The Interior Department said local input might take the form of citizen advisory councils or other local collaborative groups.

Jackson County Commissioner Sue Kupillas said she welcomes the administration's pledge to include local communities in management decisions. "I hope it means they will involve local environmental groups, ranchers, forestry people, as well as community members who recreate on those lands."

Of the national monuments Clinton set up during his final two years in office, the Cascade-Siskiyou's management plan is among those furthest along in the process. A draft plan is at the printer and should be released for public comment by late May, the Interior Department said. A final management plan could take a year or more to complete.

Dave Alberswerth, a spokesman for The Wilderness Society in Washington, D.C., said he's glad to see the process go forward on Cascade-Siskiyou and the other national monuments. "But the government's emphasis seems to be on use, use, use, rather than protection, protection, protection."

Larry Finfer, an Interior Department spokesman, said all interest groups would be invited to share their views on monument management. And, he said, protecting the resources is a high priority.

"The BLM looks on this as a high-profile opportunity to show that we can manage for excellence," Finfer said. "We know that there's a lot of local and national interest in this, and that everyone is watching."

You can reach Michelle Cole at 503-294-5143 or by e-mail at michellecole@news.oregonian.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: clintonslegacy; enviralists; environmentalism; landgrab; monuments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2002 2:51:35 PM PDT by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; COB1; Appy Pappy; Grampa Dave; nunya Bidness; Editor-surveyor; Jeff Head
ping
2 posted on 04/25/2002 2:53:18 PM PDT by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
I guess federal land grabs are bipartisan. (duh)
3 posted on 04/25/2002 2:57:07 PM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton

"While I share concerns about the way in which these monuments were created, it's our job now to see that we develop land-use plans in an open, inclusive and comprehensive way," Interior Secretary Gale Norton said Wednesday.

"Since the Klintons already beat and raped the victim, we might as well strangle her." The Bush administration said Wednesday.

4 posted on 04/25/2002 2:58:16 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Frankly...they should make the entire leftist state of Oregon a national monument.
5 posted on 04/25/2002 2:59:53 PM PDT by E=MC<sup>2</sup>
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists;*Landgrab

6 posted on 04/25/2002 3:01:35 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Can someone please explain why it makes any difference whether you call yourself a Democrat or Republican? The policies are identical.
7 posted on 04/25/2002 3:05:12 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Will the real Bush administration please stand up? This is BS! Sure, Bush will treat us better than the land-grabbing enviro-commies democraps will - but pubbies won't be president forever...
8 posted on 04/25/2002 3:06:42 PM PDT by daniel boob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Come on all you "Bush at any cost" buttlickers...where are you on this subject.
9 posted on 04/25/2002 3:07:30 PM PDT by axxmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: axxmann
I predict Bush will let Clinton's roadless area protection stand too. In any event, this decision shows which way the wind blows on these issues.
10 posted on 04/25/2002 3:14:11 PM PDT by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Bush can suck up to the watermelons (green on the outside, red on the inside) all he wants, they won't vote for him. Meanwhile, he's pissing off his base. He must think we don't have anywhere to go.
11 posted on 04/25/2002 3:17:18 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
I agree, though I don't see anything to do about it.
The USFS destroyed a Forest Service road near my childhood home that I spent many enjoyable hours traveling, both on foot and in/on various vehicles. I'll never be the same after I saw those bulldozers.
12 posted on 04/25/2002 3:18:54 PM PDT by axxmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Glutton;the gillman@blacklagoon.com;Arkie2;daniel boob
This pdf file found at the Wilderness Society's webpage is a collection of comments made by various enviros about the subject.
13 posted on 04/25/2002 3:30:00 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Thanks for the link. The comments make my point perfectly. Bush gets no credit from them for this and he just irritates his base. Go figure.
14 posted on 04/25/2002 3:35:02 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
So Klintoon's ripoff of the low sulfur coal in Utah is going to stand as well, eh? Has Bush been getting Ryadi (sp) money TOO? DISGUSTING !!!
15 posted on 04/25/2002 3:36:01 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
There is one rule that governs all bureaucracies no matter who is in charge: EXPAND and PROTECT
16 posted on 04/25/2002 3:43:15 PM PDT by reflecting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
This sucks big time!! What the H is wrong with this admin.? This makes me sick to my stomach.

You know those bracelets some people wear that say WWJD? Well, mine says WWRD. What would Reagan do. I know for certain he would not have let this stand.

Man, I am MAD!

17 posted on 04/25/2002 3:45:51 PM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
You can try to spin it however you want, but the direction is local control.
18 posted on 04/25/2002 3:55:44 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Glutton;all
Pity- here's one way to ease our dependency on foreign oil:

The Utah Coal Lockup: A trillion dollar Lippo payoff?
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/lippo.htm

Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument: Conservation and ...
Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument: Conservation
and Controversy. Petrified Woody's ...
Description: "This million-plus acre area needs protection from uncontrolled development, but at what cost?...

-``Behind Closed Doors: The Abuse of Trust And Discretion In The Establishment Of The Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument.''--

-Four Years Later, Locals Still Decry Clinton Monument --

-Coalgate--that ugly Lippo-Klink-Redford connection to tyranny--

-Clinton's Utah deal not justified-WND story--

Energy and Mineral Resources, Grand Staircase - Escalante ...
Utah Geological Survey. ... A Preliminary Assessment of Energy and Mineral Resources
within the Grand Staircase - Escalante National Monument. ...

19 posted on 04/25/2002 4:04:08 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
He must think we don't have anywhere to go.

He is basically correct.

20 posted on 04/25/2002 4:22:07 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson