Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers rally against gun violence: State Sen. Cheryl Jacques leads group, pushes for legislation
Daily News Tribune ^ | 4/18/2002 | Michael Kunzelman

Posted on 04/18/2002 7:35:59 AM PDT by Joe Brower

Lawmakers rally against gun violence: State Sen. Cheryl Jacques leads group, pushes for legislation

By Michael Kunzelman

BOSTON - Lawmakers and gun-control advocates from across New England, including the MetroWest region, gathered at the State House yesterday to share strategies for curbing gun violence.

The group, led by state Sen. Cheryl Jacques, D-Needham, announced the formation of a new regional partnership aimed at preventing criminals from crossing state lines to illegally obtain weapons.

"The reality is that in our small region guns know no borders," Jacques said. "We cannot pretend that if we are successful in limiting illegal access to weapons in one state, that we will be safe."

About 50 elected officials and advocates from Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut and Rhode Island traveled to Boston for the daylong conference, which is believed to be the first of its kind.

"Urban America is under siege from gun violence," said Rhode Island state Rep. David Cicilline, D-Providence. "By sharing information, we can succeed in each of our communities in reducing gun violence."

Natick resident Betsy Boggia, president of the region's Million Mom March chapter, said an estimated 84 people die of gun violence each day.

"I don't think we've lost that many soldiers in the Afghan war yet," she said. "We're not advocating banning guns. Our group is about a commitment to keeping them out of the hands of children and criminals."

State Rep. David Linsky, D-Natick, joined Jacques in calling for the Legislature to pass several gun-control measures they co-sponsored.

One of the bills is designed to close a loophole in the state's assault weapons ban that allowed weapons owned before Sept. 12, 1994, to be legally sold or transferred.

Another piece of legislation, which Linsky and state Sen. Cynthia Creem, D-Newton, co-sponsored, would ban some gun owners from purchasing more than one firearm or large-capacity weapon during any 30-day period.

A third bill would create a statewide database of "ballistic fingerprints," requiring all gun-makers to give the state a discharged projectile and a spent shell casing for every gun they manufacture. Ballistics evidence from crime scenes could be compared against the information in the database.

All three measures are pending in the House or Senate.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; civiliandisarmament; gungrabbers; guns; leftists; masslist; rkba
Once again, the "cradle of liberty" once again proves to the rest of the nation that it is now the cradle of statism.


1 posted on 04/18/2002 7:36:00 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bang_list

This article was located via the CalNRA website. Bookmark this site and check it daily!


2 posted on 04/18/2002 7:38:39 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
The gun banners are pushing for outright confiscation. No "reasonable gun control" will ever be enough for them. After all, every one remaining who has a gun is a dangerous nut waiting to initiate a Saturday night massacre. The possibility must be pre-empted and if the NRA doesn't like it, tough luck. I mean to Sarah Brady and Josh Sugarman, who the heck needs guns any more?
3 posted on 04/18/2002 7:38:51 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Lawmakers rally against gun violence: State Sen. Cheryl Jacques leads group, pushes for legislation

Yes, let's criminalize gun violence. What's taken them so long?

4 posted on 04/18/2002 7:40:33 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
These people are engaging in political masturbation.
5 posted on 04/18/2002 7:50:35 AM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
One of the bills is designed to close a loophole in the state's assault weapons ban that allowed weapons owned before Sept. 12, 1994, to be legally sold or transferred.

Our Rights are now viewed as "loopholes" by the tyrants.

Those who support unconstitutional legislation, such as this, are guilty of treason and sedition, and should face a jury of their peers on those charges.

6 posted on 04/18/2002 8:00:20 AM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
"An Estimated 84 People Die Each Day From Gun-Violence".Where did these stats come from?Do these numbers include law-abiding citizens who sometimes have to use their firearms to defend themselves?I wonder how many times(each day)some poor slob slips in their bath tub?Why hasn't there been some legislation prohibiting this or requiring private industry to come up with"No Slip Bath Tubs"???
7 posted on 04/18/2002 8:08:04 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bandleader
The 84 per day number is probably bogus. The anti-gun zealots make up a figure, and the dolts in the press dutifully report it. Here is how the numbers stack up, 365 days/year x 84 deaths/day= 30,660 deaths/year. I doubt if this is correct. This looks more like what we see with annual traffic fatalities.
8 posted on 04/18/2002 8:16:09 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux
The number is somewhat exaggerated, and it does count about 22,000 suicides annually (depending on what year you get the information from) Counting suicides is deliberately misleading (gosh what a surprise - antigunners deliberately lie) since Japan has a higher suicide rate than the US and virtually no access to guns.
9 posted on 04/18/2002 8:21:22 AM PDT by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
The problem is, these enemies of freedom view the mere EXISTENCE of firearms as "violence". Their goal is destroy the RKBA. And in places like Massachusetts and Califronia, there is no effective political resistance to their plans. The RKBA will soon be a relic of a by-gone day of real freedom in America. Then only those who work for government will have arms. Those of us who refuse to give up our birthright as citizens of a Free Republic will be labelled criminals and dealt with one by one. Some will die. I don't see it any other way. Those who foolishly believe that a miracle will occur in the US court system don't realize that all three branches of gov are working in concert to destroy the RKBA and with it, possibly the entire Bill of Rights.
10 posted on 04/18/2002 8:41:37 AM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
I guess we need a ban on toxic chemicals, high buildings and vehicles in order to bring the suicide rates down.
11 posted on 04/18/2002 8:46:15 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux
I guess we need a ban on toxic chemicals, high buildings and vehicles in order to bring the suicide rates down.

You forgot knives and rope.

12 posted on 04/18/2002 8:51:09 AM PDT by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
ah HA!!!!

I have been WAITING for the anti-gun supporters of totalitarianism to wait until the memory of 9-11 (and the PRO gun raction) faded, so they COULD LAUNCH THEIR COUNTER ATTACK.

OK. Now we need to launch a counter to their counter attack. Suggenstions?

13 posted on 04/18/2002 9:00:47 AM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Now we need to launch a counter to their counter attack. Suggenstions?

These people are the enemy. They will not stop until we are dead or they are dead or we are totally enslaved. They do not listen to reason, they don't care about constitutional issues ,and they certaintly are unmoved by any desire for freedom on our part because they want us to lose all freedom.

The NRA's tactic of preemptive surrender hasn't been working too well. People like Jacques, Schumer, Brady, etc. are more of a threat than the NVA was during the '70s, because the NVA could kill you, but they couldn't enslave your children. I wouldn't like to make any condign suggestions here, but keep in mind that they are a remorseless implacable enemy that will never rest until they have destroyed every last vestige of freedom that we serfs have.

14 posted on 04/18/2002 10:30:33 AM PDT by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mass_List
.
15 posted on 04/18/2002 4:07:09 PM PDT by AStack75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Another piece of legislation, which Linsky and state Sen. Cynthia Creem, D-Newton, co-sponsored, would ban some gun owners from purchasing more than one firearm or large-capacity weapon during any 30-day period.

Come again? who determines large-capacity? how is a large-capacity weapon different from a fire arm? A sword could cut down quite a few people before it dulled, is that large capacity? BAH

Brian

16 posted on 04/21/2002 1:59:49 PM PDT by PropheticZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson