Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Richest In State Carry Load
CTNOW (Website of Hartford Courant) ^ | April 15, 2002 | MIKE SWIFT

Posted on 04/15/2002 8:19:18 AM PDT by the

Painful as it might be, as you pop your income tax returns in the mail today, you might want to say a small thank you to Connecticut's ultra-rich, and the New York financial markets that made them that way.

In recent years, taxpayers in a handful of towns with the highest average state income tax payments - most of them in Fairfield County - have produced a huge chunk of Connecticut's income tax revenue, according to the state Department of Revenue Services.

In 2000, for example, taxpayers in just 15 of Connecticut's 169 towns paid $1.1 billion - one third of the total payments made by individual taxpayers who filed state 1040EZ or 1040 forms in 2001.

New Canaan, Greenwich and Weston, the towns with the highest average income tax per return, alone accounted for $484 million in payments from about 37,000 tax returns.

In comparison, individual taxpayers in Connecticut's three largest cities - Bridgeport, Hartford and New Haven - paid $94 million on 127,000 returns.

And though the recent economic slowdown is causing a revenue crunch, Connecticut tax officials say they expect those who gained the most from robust financial markets will continue to contribute the most in taxes.

Tax collections for the current fiscal year are about $139 million behind last year's pace, but Fairfield County should continue to power the state's revenue engine, said Ernest Adamo, a senior analyst and legislative liaison for the revenue services department.

Greenwich accountant Thomas J. McGoldrick noticed the effects of Wall Street's bearish year on the tax returns he prepared this year.

The downturn in the stock market has pared the size of the typical income tax payment in Greenwich, where virtually every return McGoldrick prepares includes some kind of capital transaction.

"It's pretty much tied to the market," McGoldrick said of the drop.

In the same Greenwich zip code - 06831 - where McGoldrick prepares tax returns, taxpayers reported $160 million in interest income alone, according to IRS data from 1998, when the markets were still surging. That was an average of more than $26,000 a tax return.

Their incomes swollen by financial returns such as those in recent years, taxpayers in New Canaan and Greenwich paid more than $13,000 per state return on average last year. That was a 30-percent jump from the average payment made by New Canaan and Greenwich taxpayers just two years earlier.

This year, the party ended; the taxman will suffer the hangover.

"There's been a significant loss in investment appreciation in the last year," McGoldrick said of the Greenwich tax returns he's seeing.

With few exceptions, Connecticut's income tax take diminishes with a town's relative distance from Wall Street.

Avon and Simsbury were the only Hartford County towns to crack the top 15 taxpayer towns. Woodbridge, Lyme and Sharon also made the list. But every other town among the top taxpayers was in Fairfield County.

Some in those wealthy towns are not happy that so little money they send to Hartford returns in state aid.

"We also realize we're an affluent community and there are other communities that have great needs; we just think we should share a little bit more" in state revenues, said New Canaan First Selectman Richard P. Bond. "You tell them up there [in Hartford] we'd like to get a little better share."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: connecticut; taxation; wealth
Total state revenue from 1040's (in 2000)              $3.3B

Population of New Canaan, Greenwich and Weston 90,500 Tax for these three towns' residents $ 484M

Average per-resident tax = $ 5348

Population of Bridgeport, Hartford and New Haven 385,000 Tax for three largest cities $ 94M

Average per-resident tax = $ 244

Ratio of average per-resident tax paid to CT between highest taxed town and the largest cities



5348 21.8 -------- = -------- 244 1

1 posted on 04/15/2002 8:19:18 AM PDT by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: the
formatting fix.
     Total state revenue from 1040's (in 2000)              $3.3B

     Population of New Canaan, Greenwich and Weston        90,500
     Tax for these three towns' residents                  $ 484M  

	    Average per-resident tax = $ 5348

     Population of Bridgeport, Hartford and New Haven	  385,000
     Tax for three largest cities                           $ 94M  

            Average per-resident tax = $  244




Ratio of average per-resident tax paid to CT between highest taxed town and the largest cities


       5348            21.8
     --------   =   --------    
        244             1




2 posted on 04/15/2002 8:21:06 AM PDT by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *connecticut
Bump.
3 posted on 04/15/2002 8:24:39 AM PDT by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the
If I were King of Connecticut, I would decree that once any resident has paid a certain amount, he had done his share and all additional income would be tax free. Leaving this money to its rightful earners and owners would result in great economic benefit to all the citizens. After all, no matter how extravagantly they might live (and most don't) the rich can only spend a small portion of their income, and must invest the rest. This produces jobs. Why let the state take if from them to subsidize the democrat political base and produce a huge economic drag? While democrats pretend to favor the little guy, they really favor their special constituencies at the expense of the little guy.
4 posted on 04/15/2002 8:25:54 AM PDT by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
Yeah, and all the southerners wonder who "pays" for the government pork that comes to their states.
5 posted on 04/15/2002 8:32:12 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
Ain't capitalism grand?
6 posted on 04/15/2002 8:32:51 AM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco
It would sure beat what we have in Connecticut!
7 posted on 04/15/2002 8:35:06 AM PDT by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
I meant to say that Connecticut also pays a higher amount of FEDERAL tax revenue than any other state. What Connecticut makes, Mississippi and Arkansas take.

There was NO state income tax in Connecticut when I was a kid (I grew up in CT's socialist neighbor to the south). RINOs and Dem Socialists changed that.

8 posted on 04/15/2002 8:35:41 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
But there was a 14% tax on interest and dividends. Rich people are now actually better off than before, paying 4.5% on their income.
9 posted on 04/15/2002 8:44:19 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: *Connecticut
CT ping!
10 posted on 04/15/2002 8:47:10 AM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
There should be NO capital gains tax. Why punish success?

Personally, it is the PROGRESSIVE (anything "progressive" is usually socialist isn't it) income tax that pisses me off! If anything, we should abolish the income tax and put in a national sales tax that EVERYONE PAYS, including the tax eaters who currently DON'T pay anything, yet receive the EITC and other bennies from the Feds.

11 posted on 04/15/2002 8:50:31 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the;#1CTYankee; .303 Brit; 2nd amendment mama; 2Trievers; AGBRUHN; always vigilant; Andonius_99...
CT Bump!

If any one would like to be removed from my CT Bump list, please let me know and it will be done ASAP. Conversely, if you would like to be added the same holds true.

12 posted on 04/15/2002 9:38:02 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
I was shocked to see this in the Courant this morning. This probably comes as a "stunning revelation" to them as well as most of their readership.

Just had to mail those a$$holes another $2500 today on top of my withholding all year long. Upper-middleclass is bad enough, I can't imagine cutting a check in the amount some of those folks in the upper eschelon have to. I'd hide it anywhere I could.

13 posted on 04/15/2002 9:47:45 AM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the
I am surprised about Weston being higher than Darien or Westport. Must be because it is (I beleive) such a young place - everybody works - not too many old fogies - and I think there is no public housing.
14 posted on 04/15/2002 11:01:33 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
Who was the Governor who passed the income tax in the first place? Was it O'Neill (D) or Weicker (OCP/former RINO)? I remember it happening, but can't recall who was governor.

Unfotunately, there is NO place within commuting distance of NYC that has low or even moderate taxes.

15 posted on 04/15/2002 11:46:00 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
It was Governor Ego himself, Lowell Weicker.
16 posted on 04/15/2002 12:23:42 PM PDT by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson