Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration legislation put on hold
Austin American-Statesman ^ | April 11, 2002 | Julia Malone

Posted on 04/12/2002 8:07:18 AM PDT by gubamyster

Immigration legislation put on hold Measure would have allowed foreigners to stay in U.S. while applying for residency By Julia Malone

WASHINGTON BUREAU

Thursday, April 11, 2002

WASHINGTON -- An immigration measure to ease legalization for as many as 300,000 foreign residents that once seemed on track has been put on indefinite hold in the Senate, its supporters and opponents say.

The provision would have allowed spouses of Americans and some other illegal immigrants to remain in the United States while they apply for permanent residency green cards.

Under current law, foreigners must return to their home countries and wait for visas -- a wait that could last years.

The turnaround comes after public objections to what had been a quiet effort by the Republican House leadership to attach a provision to the popular border security bill, which had passed late last year on a unanimous vote. It mandates better tracking of foreign visitors.

The exception, which had squeaked through the House last month after heavy pressure from President Bush, triggered protest calls and e-mails to congressional offices. Critics and radio talk-show hosts called the provision, known officially as Section 245i of the Immigration Law, a "stealth amnesty" for illegal aliens.

Next week, as the Senate prepares to take up the border security bill, it will not consider the 245i language. Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., chief sponsor of the border bill, has decided to drop the provision to speed up passage, said his spokeswoman, Stephanie Cutter.

Pro-immigrant groups said they do not know when Congress will again take up the legalization effort.

"Obviously they've been focused on the border security bill" more than 245i, said Angela Kelley, an official with the National Immigration Forum.

"I don't think there's any question that grass-roots mobilization has been a factor," said Rosemary Jenks, a lobbyist for NumbersUSA, a nonpartisan group that favors a reduction in immigration.

The constituent pressure also was cited by a spokeswoman for Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., who led the opposition to 245i in the House and came within one vote of defeating it.

"Our office was inundated with phone calls and e-mails in the days after" the vote, said Tancredo's aide, Lara Kennedy. "Especially in our district office, you couldn't get through on the phone lines."

Then the measure reached the Senate, where it ran into the opposition of Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, the senior Democrat and master of parliamentary delay tactics. Byrd, who was already slowing down action on the overall border bill, announced he would use his considerable powers to block the 245i legalization provision.

Kennedy, who has been trying to pass the border-tightening measure since December, has called a hearing of the Judiciary Committee on Friday to allow Byrd to air his concerns about border security. But as of now, legalization is off the Senate's agenda.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 245i; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2002 8:07:18 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Good news.....All the terror in Israel makes Americans even more serious about vetting those who want to live here.
2 posted on 04/12/2002 8:12:13 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
BTW, on an earlier thread I promised to name my apartment after Robert Byrd if he succeeded in blocking 245i. I think I now have to deliver.

Byrd did not block 245(i). The House version of the Border Security bill passed in December, and did not include 245(i) until March. Byrd has been blocking the passage of this bill for almost 3 months before 245(i) was attached. He blocked the bill, because he is pissed at Bush, for not allowing him to attach 20 million dollars to some terrorist bill back in November.

The original House version of the bill is on the Senate floor as we speak.

6 posted on 04/12/2002 10:44:52 AM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: gubamyster
Everyone should remember that Bush was strongly for this amnesty bill that WE THE PEOPLE STOPPED!

Bush MUST be held accountable for being for amnesty for illegal aliens; he must pay the political price.

8 posted on 04/12/2002 11:00:07 AM PDT by RickyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector;healey22;lutine;Right_Makes_Might;wku man;sonofliberty2;fishing fool...
245(i) Alert from NumbersUSA

4/12/02 - 2 PM PDT
NumbersUSA Website

We just received word that the Bush Administration is pushing for a 245(i) amendment to the Visa Tracking bill, H.R. 3525 when the Senate resumes business on Monday.

One of the Nebraska Senators (Brownback or Hagel) is expected to sponsor the 245(i)extension amendment on behalf of the White House. A vote could be scheduled for Tuesday.

We suggest two actions in response to this bad news:

1. Call the White House switchboard (202) 456-1414. Tell the administration to stop pushing for the 245(i) amnesty in the Senate. (Many of you expressed difficulty in reaching a live person but please keep trying).

2. Call your Senators. Even if you called them in the last few days in support of the Visa Tracking bill. Please follow up and tell them to oppose any 245(i) amnesty amendment. Again, you will probably know about this proposed amendment before many staff members.

There is no chance of changing the minds of Hagel and Brownback so we don't suggest contacting them at this time unless you are their constituent.

Thank you for your assistance in this latest amnesty attempt by the administration. We'll send you a more detailed update over the weekend.

9 posted on 04/12/2002 4:02:58 PM PDT by Tancredo Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
Bump*
10 posted on 04/12/2002 4:06:06 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
Thanks for the heads-up, bro. I'm on it.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

11 posted on 04/12/2002 4:48:33 PM PDT by wku man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
bump.
12 posted on 04/12/2002 4:55:56 PM PDT by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
Thanks for the ping. Now over to your other post.
13 posted on 04/12/2002 5:04:58 PM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HangFire; AnnaZ; abigail2; NewDestiny; rebuildus; Cortez; brat; MissAmericanPie; miss print...
immigration bump
14 posted on 04/12/2002 7:28:23 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
He is determined to open those borders isn't he?

I will act...

15 posted on 04/12/2002 7:31:56 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
"He is determined to open those borders isn't he?

I will act...

I will too!

16 posted on 04/12/2002 7:35:32 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Only 300,000. Nothing to see here. That's just the equivalent of a mid size American city.
17 posted on 04/12/2002 7:39:25 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Tancredo Fan
It strikes me that the release of the original article posted here was a deliberate attempt to lie to those who object to this amnesty. (I'm referring to the writing of the article, not the posting of it, since the poster had no way of knowing that it was a lie.)
19 posted on 04/12/2002 8:47:49 PM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
Bump!
20 posted on 04/12/2002 8:50:38 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson