World court now a reality

Worldnet Daily ^ | 11 APR 02 | Mary Jo Anderson

[Lumberjack]

Well, they can try all they want. They hold no jurisdiction over me, or you, or anybody else. No matter what their wailings and teeth gnashing sessions, we can simply refuse as citizens to take part in this.

I did not authorize or give permission for somebody else, to authorize the transfer of my alligiance to a foreign power, not even by voting for my "representative". Nobody can ever give away my rights, period. Ergo, the treaty is null and void in my eyes, regardless of what the Traitor In Chief decides to do.

[Joe Brower]

I concur with Lumberjack's statements 100%.

[packrat01]

Bingo! Even if it's ratified in the Senate; it's still un-Constitutional.

How many sheeple will follow along unaware? Gobs of 'em...

[WALLACE212]

I concur as well. Come and take it Kofi, I DARE YA!

[Spiff]

The World Court and a United Nations tax are the lines in the sand that we need to draw and not let anyone cross. Let them dress up in their stupid robes and powdered wigs, let them print up the tax forms, but the day that they try to enforce anything here on U.S. soil is the day that the Second Amendment was written for.

[Lumberjack]

Most people will eventually think that they should follow these goons. Mark my word, once this is ratified and passed (it will be, or do we still have some koolaid drinkers who think that it won't, just like CFR "won't ever be passed"), there will be a massive PR campaign featuring the World Court ruling on all kinds of morally disagreeable actions, to make them look like the good guys.

Its our job, from the get go, to make sure that not only doesn't their treason go unchallenged, but that we have a large contingent of people on our side willing to resist this.

You're either free, or your not. I'm tired of not being free. This is just one more reason why we need to stop this entire world movement towards neo-fascisim, and stop it now.

[Spiff]

[WALLACE212]

"The Other Side" is good at the propoganda game, to be sure. Hitler got an entire nation to follow blindly, and he was small-time compared to the methods and capabilities in place today.

Good thing I could give a flying f*** what they think.

OPTIONS-

1) Victory

2) Death

To the last round fired in righteous anger, the last breath drawn in defiance, the last drop of blood shed for a cause most holy, LET FREEDOM RING!

[tomakaze]

RE:but the day that they try to enforce anything here on U.S. soil is the day that the Second Amendment was written for.
 
From what I've read about the tax it'll be sneaky and fly under most peoples radar - something like a minute percentage on bank transactions that the bank will collect under everyones nose. then once established it'll increase (like this sort of thing always does.)
Evil.

[VRWC_Member428]

tomakaze:
It's also worth noting that Bush the Younger made no attempt to get out of it.

steve50:
Bush must be sure he can control it from touching the neocons, he passed on his chance to preserve the Constitutional rights of American citizens.

World Net Daily:
As late as Monday there were reports that President Bush had sought means to retract the signature of former president Clinton, who signed the treaty on his last day in office.
-snip-
Key European allies have accused the Bush administration's refusal to support the court as an example of U.S. "unilateralism" in an interdependent world.
-snip-
Several U.S. allies, notably Canada, have urged the Bush administration to support the court as a means to hold genocidal tyrants accountable for their crimes.

I must be missing something here. The article seems to make it quite clear that Bush does not agree with the court, and is trying to find a way to retract the signature of Clinton. Are we reading the same article?

[nopardons]

The tax that the UN wants to impose, is on CURRENCY EXCHANGE . The vast majority of people, here and abroad, do NOT regularly change from their currency into another countries. It won't " fly under " anyone's radar, as banks , in the USA , are required to list all fees.

This doesn't have a lot of chance to be passed here, so do, please, enjoy your delusional nightmares, about things you dond't seem to know anything about. : - )

[Travis McGee]

BLOAT some more!

[steve50]

Yes, we are. It's my understanding he has the Constitutional authority to remove the signature. So I can't understand what he's looking for, unless he just needs the court to have credibility until it's done with Milosevic.

[tomakaze]

RE:President Bush had both the ability and power to remove the signature - or at the very least come out with a public statement saying it was null and void in his eyes. But he refused to do either
 
exactly.

[tomakaze]

RE:The tax that the UN wants to impose, is on CURRENCY EXCHANGE . The vast majority of people, here and abroad, do NOT regularly change from their currency into another countries. It won't " fly under " anyone's radar, as banks , in the USA , are required to list all fees.
 
A usefull detail, which I did not get from the stuff I'd read about it. Still, Camel's noses and tents... thin end of wedges... etc etc.
 
<>This doesn't have a lot of chance to be passed here,
Which is why a vote was bypassed.
 
so do, please, enjoy your delusional nightmares, about things you dond't seem to know anything about. : - )
 
I appreciate the extra info (above), but spare me the condescensing crap.
Spin on it :-)

[tomakaze]

RE:condescensing
@!&%!... typo. I'll berate myself before the grammer/spelling nazi's dogpile on.

[nopardons]

There was no " condesention " in my reply. Since you do NOT know the particulars, you can't make reasoned nor rational posts. Ergo, they are merely delsional; based on your own fears, and nonexistant threats.

Since the real target, of the UN tax, is worldwide corporations , they aren't going to sit still for it and American banks won't want to become tax collectors for the UN, they are going to have to rethink this garbage. Their is NO " camel's nose " here.

[nopardons]

Their = There