Skip to comments.
World court now a reality
Worldnet Daily ^
| 11 APR 02
| Mary Jo Anderson
Posted on 04/11/2002 9:27:44 AM PDT by tomakaze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: packrat01
Well, they can try all they want. They hold no jurisdiction over me, or you, or anybody else. No matter what their wailings and teeth gnashing sessions, we can simply refuse as citizens to take part in this.
I did not authorize or give permission for somebody else, to authorize the transfer of my alligiance to a foreign power, not even by voting for my "representative". Nobody can ever give away my rights, period. Ergo, the treaty is null and void in my eyes, regardless of what the Traitor In Chief decides to do.
To: packrat01, Lumberjack
I concur with Lumberjack's statements 100%.
To: Lumberjack
Bingo! Even if it's ratified in the Senate; it's still un-Constitutional.
How many sheeple will follow along unaware? Gobs of 'em...
To: Joe Brower; Lumberjack
I concur as well. Come and take it Kofi, I DARE YA!
To: tomakaze
The World Court and a United Nations tax are the lines in the sand that we need to draw and not let anyone cross. Let them dress up in their stupid robes and powdered wigs, let them print up the tax forms, but the day that they try to enforce anything here on U.S. soil is the day that the Second Amendment was written for.
25
posted on
04/12/2002 12:43:46 PM PDT
by
Spiff
To: packrat01;WALLACE212;Joe Brower
Most people will eventually think that they should follow these goons. Mark my word, once this is ratified and passed (it will be, or do we still have some koolaid drinkers who think that it won't, just like CFR "won't ever be passed"), there will be a massive PR campaign featuring the World Court ruling on all kinds of morally disagreeable actions, to make them look like the good guys.
Its our job, from the get go, to make sure that not only doesn't their treason go unchallenged, but that we have a large contingent of people on our side willing to resist this.
You're either free, or your not. I'm tired of not being free. This is just one more reason why we need to stop this entire world movement towards neo-fascisim, and stop it now.
To: WALLACE212
27
posted on
04/12/2002 12:47:13 PM PDT
by
Spiff
To: Lumberjack
"The Other Side" is good at the propoganda game, to be sure. Hitler got an entire nation to follow blindly, and he was small-time compared to the methods and capabilities in place today.
Good thing I could give a flying f*** what they think.
OPTIONS-
1) Victory
2) Death
To the last round fired in righteous anger, the last breath drawn in defiance, the last drop of blood shed for a cause most holy, LET FREEDOM RING!
To: Spiff
RE:but the day that they try to enforce anything here on U.S. soil is the day that the Second Amendment was written for.
From what I've read about the tax it'll be sneaky and fly under most peoples radar - something like a minute percentage on bank transactions that the bank will collect under everyones nose. then once established it'll increase (like this sort of thing always does.)
Evil.
29
posted on
04/12/2002 4:53:17 PM PDT
by
tomakaze
To: tomakaze, steve50
tomakaze:
It's also worth noting that Bush the Younger made no attempt to get out of it.
steve50:
Bush must be sure he can control it from touching the neocons, he passed on his chance to preserve the Constitutional rights of American citizens.
World Net Daily:
As late as Monday there were reports that President Bush had sought means to retract the signature of former president Clinton, who signed the treaty on his last day in office.
-snip-
Key European allies have accused the Bush administration's refusal to support the court as an example of U.S. "unilateralism" in an interdependent world.
-snip-
Several U.S. allies, notably Canada, have urged the Bush administration to support the court as a means to hold genocidal tyrants accountable for their crimes.
I must be missing something here. The article seems to make it quite clear that Bush does not agree with the court, and is trying to find a way to retract the signature of Clinton. Are we reading the same article?
To: tomakaze
The tax that the UN wants to impose, is on
CURRENCY EXCHANGE . The vast majority of people, here and abroad, do NOT regularly change from their currency into another countries. It won't " fly under " anyone's radar, as banks , in the USA , are required to list all fees.
This doesn't have a lot of chance to be passed here, so do, please, enjoy your delusional nightmares, about things you dond't seem to know anything about. : - )
To: Joe Brower
BLOAT some more!
To: VRWC_Member428
Yes, we are. It's my understanding he has the Constitutional authority to remove the signature. So I can't understand what he's looking for, unless he just needs the court to have credibility until it's done with Milosevic.
33
posted on
04/13/2002 4:36:40 AM PDT
by
steve50
To: fogarty
RE:President Bush had both the ability and power to remove the signature - or at the very least come out with a public statement saying it was null and void in his eyes. But he refused to do either
exactly.
34
posted on
04/13/2002 1:44:23 PM PDT
by
tomakaze
To: nopardons
RE:The tax that the UN wants to impose, is on CURRENCY EXCHANGE . The vast majority of people, here and abroad, do NOT regularly change from their currency into another countries. It won't " fly under " anyone's radar, as banks , in the USA , are required to list all fees.
A usefull detail, which I did not get from the stuff I'd read about it. Still, Camel's noses and tents... thin end of wedges... etc etc.
<>This doesn't have a lot of chance to be passed here,
Which is why a vote was bypassed.
so do, please, enjoy your delusional nightmares, about things you dond't seem to know anything about. : - )
I appreciate the extra info (above), but spare me the condescensing crap.
Spin on it :-)
35
posted on
04/13/2002 1:52:27 PM PDT
by
tomakaze
To: tomakaze
RE:condescensing
@!&%!... typo. I'll berate myself before the grammer/spelling nazi's dogpile on.
36
posted on
04/13/2002 1:55:20 PM PDT
by
tomakaze
To: tomakaze
There was no " condesention " in my reply. Since you do
NOT know the particulars, you can't make reasoned nor rational posts. Ergo, they are merely delsional; based on your own fears, and nonexistant threats.
Since the real target, of the UN tax, is worldwide corporations , they aren't going to sit still for it and American banks won't want to become tax collectors for the UN, they are going to have to rethink this garbage. Their is NO " camel's nose " here.
To: nopardons
Their = There
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson