Skip to comments.
Iranian Leader Khamenei Calls for One-Month Oil Embargo Against Pro-Israeli Western Nations
Debka Files ^
| April 5, 2002
| Debka
Posted on 04/05/2002 6:16:44 AM PST by jraven
As DEBKA-Net-Weekly Predicted: Muslim Oil Embargo Threat Is Brandished - Influences Bush Turnaround
5 April: Friday, April 5, Irans spiritual leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, called on Arab states to enforce a one-month oil embargo against Western countries, to pressure them to stop supporting Israel. A similar call issued from Baghdad on Monday, April 1.
This following passage comes from the DEBKA-Net-Weekly, Issue 55, which was published earlier:
As oil prices soared to a six-month high, Iran and Iraq began muttering this week about aMuslim-Arab oil embargo for bending America to their will.(DEBKA-Net-Weekly predicted this development in its January 25, 2002 Issue, No. 46.)
Now, they are not thinking terms of the 1973-4 all-Arab oil embargo - but rather of combining in an Iranian-Iraqi-Saudi bloc to stand against the US-Russian partnership. This embargo would only target the United States, Russia and Israel, but not affect Japan, China and West Europe.
DEBKAfiles Gulf sources add that Irans leaders, backed by Iraq - with Saudi Arabia quietly active in the wings - are hard-selling their oil embargo plan. As terrorism spreads, this hardline Muslim axis expects to apply the Arab oil embargo threat as an irresistible weapon for forcing the Bush administration to turn its back on Israel and swing its support behind Yasser Arafat.
Our oil experts point out, however, that times have changed since the 1973-4 Arab embargo. The United States is no longer solely dependent on Arab oil producers. Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia, the largest oil-producing bloc in the world, will not risk losing their primary source of revenue in the long term. However their threat alone is enough to throw world oil prices expected to shoot up in the next day or two into disarray, as well as shocking financial markets. All three producers will make sure to keep their markets in Japan and Europe - even if they have to bypass their own embargo
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arafat; iran; iraq; israel; middleeast; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Dog Gone
To: Eva
To: jraven
Just the fact that this has been published (whether credible or not) will probably boost gas prices by the end of the day.
43
posted on
04/05/2002 8:41:55 AM PST
by
AUgrad
To: BOBTHENAILER
As I recall, the CATO analyst mentioned that within a few years, the Russians will have ramped up their production to the level that will make OPEC almost irrelevant. This could be good news or bad news, given that more supply is welcome but the Russians may not be any more of a long term reliability than OPEC is.
To: seoseo
Better yet, how about we just go in and take the damned oil that we discovered and run the industry that we allowed those bastards to nationalize.
45
posted on
04/05/2002 8:44:38 AM PST
by
pgkdan
To: freeasinbeer
Debka was right about Khamenei calling for a symbolic embargo. They got it wrong about it shocking the financial markets and sending oil soaring.
The markets are smarter than that.
46
posted on
04/05/2002 8:45:39 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: dennisw
I believe you are correct, they will have a difficult time trying to keep the US from buying their oil because it goes out into the general marketplace. More likely, given that these Arab economies are addicted to oil revenue like it was crack or heroine, they wouldn't outlast the embargo, a revolution would occur as soon as the money is cut off. No oil money, no support for the dictators.
To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Russians may not be any more of a long term reliability than OPEC isUnquestionably a concern. However, with the new discoveries I mentioned in post #19, Offshore West Africa, eastern South America, Caspian region, ANWR & others to come, Russia will be well advised to maintain market share rather than threaten.
To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Russians may not be any more of a long term reliability than OPEC isUnquestionably a concern. However, with the new discoveries I mentioned in post #19, Offshore West Africa, eastern South America, Caspian region, ANWR & others to come, Russia will be well advised to maintain market share rather than threaten.
To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Russians may not be any more of a long term reliability than OPEC isUnquestionably a concern. However, with the new discoveries I mentioned in post #19, Offshore West Africa, eastern South America, Caspian region, ANWR & others to come, Russia will be well advised to maintain market share rather than threaten.
To: BOBTHENAILER; All
sorry for the triple post, browser problems. Mucho apologies to everyone.
To: dennisw
You are correct. In the case of a boycott/embargo, the US would simply purchase the same oil from a 'middle man'. So, again, the idea of an embargo will only serve to weaken their own countries.
52
posted on
04/05/2002 9:28:45 AM PST
by
rintense
To: Dog Gone
The markets are smarter than thatYou're right. The per barrel price of oil will go up little.
However the per gallon price at the gasoline pump will jump.
Any excuse will work as long as we continue to buy the lie.
53
posted on
04/05/2002 9:32:28 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: Dog Gone
Iraq wanted to start an embargo with 2 other of the OPEC countries
54
posted on
04/05/2002 9:33:10 AM PST
by
Kaslin
To: untenured,Citizen of the Savage Nation,rintense
Thanks for the answers. Due to a lot more oil being sold via the spot market the oil is more fungible. It goes to the high bidder whomever he might be.
55
posted on
04/05/2002 9:37:22 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: rintense
Digging their own graves... That's why they put a limit of 1 month, longer than that these evil arab states will have an explosion of uprisings against their govt. So, I say go ahead, make the USA's day, this will save us from sending our troops to iraq, and iran. I don't think saddam is that stupid, but I can dream, can't I?
To: freeasinbeer
You are correct. I was wrong. It looks as though Iran is changing its position on an embargo, following Bush's speech, blaming Iran, as well as Iraq for the situation in Israel.
57
posted on
04/05/2002 9:42:27 AM PST
by
Eva
To: freeasinbeer
This reminds me of a cornered criminal where the crook threathens to shoot himself if the cops don't back off. ROTFLMAO. Typical for the Islamist nuts. Great, let them shatter their own economies and cut of the funding for their terrorist, that'll show us.
58
posted on
04/05/2002 9:43:15 AM PST
by
Leto
To: Kaslin
Iraq wanted to start an embargo with 2 other of the OPEC countries An embargo only works if a country completely stops producing, because it loses control over the destination of the crude once the ship has left port. It would take ALL of the OPEC countries to shut in production to cause a shortage.
That would hurt us, but it would hurt all oil-importing countries. But it would hurt OPEC far worse. Most of them have crappy little economies that are completely dependent on oil revenue, and an embargo would cause them to instantly lose access to the credit markets.
Our prices would go up, but their lights would go off. It ain't gonna happen.
59
posted on
04/05/2002 9:43:58 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: desertcry
Hey, I always say dream big and dare to fail. :)
60
posted on
04/05/2002 10:11:29 AM PST
by
rintense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson