Posted on 04/03/2002 5:12:30 AM PST by Mia T
|
Thanx. Perfect!
I always thought the joyride with the clintons and their legions of enablers & shills would end when American blood was spilled and America woke up to the cost of looking the other way to their corruption, but while 911 has seen some erosion of "that legacy thing," it really has not been profound enough.
Yet....
Those who don't learn from the past really are doomed to repeat it, and I honestly do not think America could or would survive a reprise of "the Most Ethical Administration in History....."
I'm afraid we have only seen the tip of the iceburg with respect to the damage done to America by the Clintons. Selling nuclear secrets for campaign contributions, depletion of the military on an unprecedented scale, and reducing the bar of morality are just part of the Clinton legacy. I admit that I too have a "totally bizarre psychotic obsession" with the Clintons. My frustration stems from the fact that the liberal mainstream media has refused to address the most severe of Clinton's actions. I want the world to know every detail of this traitor's reign. Now if I could just put some color in this post, maybe a few more folks would know the truth.--Quilla |
the clintons were utter failures and the GOP had better exploit it 4th-Estate Malfeasance (DEATH BY MISREPORT) rodham-clinton REALITY CHECK bump! |
|
alpractice and/or malfeasance by "compartmentalization" redux... It appears that The New York Times doesn't learn from its mistakes. Will it take the Times another 50 years to understand/admit that by having endorsed for reelection a "documentably dysfunctional" president with "delusions" -- its own words -- it must bear sizeable blame for the 9-11 horror and its aftermath ? (Note, by the way, the irony of Sulzberger's carefully worded rationalization of the clinton endorsements, pointing to clinton "policies," not achievements, (perhaps understanding, at last, that clinton "achievements" -- when legal -- were more illusory than real--perhaps understanding, at last, that the Times' Faustian bargain was not such a good deal after all).).
|
|
"I think the rock is still there, but I'm not sure," Helen quipped. Her punch line to clinton's response to her question about a -- (only in Helen's mind) 'fantasy' -- clinton kleptocracy, was in fact 4th-estate CYA-ing disguised as a joke. Ironically, unbeknownst to the always clueless Helen, the one-liner she was delivering was indeed a joke; it was the butt of the joke that was her misreport...
|
|
|
|
Will Riefenstahl-esque "editing to perfection" resurrect the clintons? |
EW YORK, Jan.4--Second-string clinton lapdog, Ann Lewis, failed in her attempt to implement the CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme on "Hannity & Colmes" tonight. The team's implementation score, thus far, is 352 failed attempts and zero successes, despite the best aiding-and-abetting efforts of The New York Times, the Washington Post and Helen Thomas. Rather than disproving the motivating premise of the Harlem-hatched mission -- a clinton legacy of depravity, ineptitude and failure -- Lewis' tired shtick only served to underscore the premise's essential truth. Oliver (Ollie) North, a combat-decorated Marine and host of the Fox News show, "War Stories," was substituting for Sean Hannity. Ollie delivered the coup de grâce: "Reagan didn't need to remind the people about his legacy... The people already made up their mind about clinton." Said another way, the very existence of the CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme is confirmation that the clintons were, indeed, utter failures. |
Bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.