Posted on 03/25/2002 2:04:25 AM PST by JohnHuang2
Okay, " talk is cheap " . and whatever President Bush said to Fox, Fox did what he pleased. How would you have handled it ; held a gun to Fox's head ? As for Canada, a Socialist haven, what did you expect ? Oh yes, please forgive, yet o9nce again ... I keep forgeting, that in your universe, the American president is GOD, and can make everyone bend to his will with a word.
At least you admitted that President Bush did well; even IF it was a left handed compliment, and had to be aqueezed out of you. Thank you for that . : - )
FOR CRYING OUT LOUD ... when are you and your ilk going to see reality for what it is ? If you refuse to , I can gaurentee you one absolute certainty in your lives ... you will NEVER, be happy / pleased / satisfied with any president 's term in office ! If you want to live your life, with your guts forever in knots, churning out one post after another BORING post, with bashings , you will have accomplished less than nothing.
I give up.
To Hell with the Consitutition...I just wanna' be happy!
The UN, NAFTA, NATO, IMF, WTO, GATT, and those who endorse them need reality therapy.
BTW, your "rant" was just that, sound and fury signifiying nothing but obeisance to the Bush dynasty of a NWO.
Nicely said.
The best interest in question may be different depending on the adminstration but it is always "what can we get in return for the aid !"
If you disagree with any aid then you are ignorant of the facts and why we give foreign aid. If you don't agree with the reasons or who we give the aid to then that's you opinion !
Not even Ronald Reagan did.
And ain't that pathetic?
Damn betcha! You and all the other stary-eyed one-worlders have a death wish for this country.
Your view of the world is so distorted it is not even worth arguing with you. Ronald Reagan was a Liberal in your eyes.
You just can't let it go can you. There is an ongoing thread about the UN tax and all the dire predictions that Bush would come back and immediately start printing up the forms. I wonder if you was on that thread?
Bush can't be compared to Reagan. W has never worked a day in his life nor provided for himself and his family on his own. He had no career before politics and doesn't even give lip service to the Constitution.
If Bush is going to make Reagan look like a liberal, he sure is off to a slow start.
"Oh, the starving poverty stricken children in _________ (fill in the blank). These heartless conservatives think they don't deserve our help."
That sounds so familiar coming from Kennedy and his pals. It sounds comical coming from what passes for a conservative in your party. It's just that you wouldn't refer to those of us who oppose giving away money we don't have as "conservatives". You'd have to call us "tinfoilers" or something else in order to maintain the illusion that you boys are the real conservatives.
This is wonderfully entertaining material for a Tuesday morning. Give me some more of it, young fellow.
Fine. Show me the grant of power in the Constitution which covers this. If you're going to claim it's covered in a treaty, show me which UN treaty requires foreign aid from the US and how much it requires.
I'll wait as long as it takes you to look it up.
Has Bush advocated the withdrawl of the US from the un? I must have missed that.
Regards
J.R.
Of course, Clinton was full of sh!t 99% of the time, but once his first two years were an utter failure he decided that his own career was more important than his liberal principles and toed the Republican Party line for the most part.
The most lasting impacts of these presidents are their Supreme Court appointments, and Reagan's weren't much better than anyone else's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.