Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debate on concealed weapons revealing
Rocky Mountain News ^ | 23 Mar 02 | Mike Littwin

Posted on 03/24/2002 9:37:02 AM PST by real saxophonist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2002 9:37:03 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
It looks like the concealed-weapons guys are serious
2 posted on 03/24/2002 9:38:06 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Wow, this guy's an idiot, and dangerous to boot. Perhaps columnists should be licensed, as spreading misinformation via newsletter is at least as dangerous to society at large as citizens owning weapons...
3 posted on 03/24/2002 9:43:38 AM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
There are competing studies. And there's also, say, the well-armed citizenry of Afghanistan.

Or even the well-armed citizenry of Switzerland. But he won't mention that.

4 posted on 03/24/2002 9:49:03 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
"In 1997, 630 children under the age of 15 died from gunshot wounds in America." (Rocky Mountain News)

Meaning - as undisputable math - that far fewer than one in three U.S. counties had even one under-driving-age kid die from gunfire that year!

Bring the math up in the gun debate. Bring up the fact that "child gun death" is undisputably statistically an aberration - not a norm - in America! And drive the lesson home by asking ditzbrain sucker mom arguing otherwise when was the last time any kid on her street was shot.

Scandals of antigun politicians and activists - coast to coast

5 posted on 03/24/2002 9:49:26 AM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist;*bang_list
Thanks for posting this.

Best regards,

6 posted on 03/24/2002 9:49:57 AM PST by Copernicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
by living most of my life in cities where people in great numbers use guns to kill other people in great numbers.

Vast majority are criminals killing criminals and of a CERTAIN RACIAL makeup. Course you can't say this
7 posted on 03/24/2002 10:02:44 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Borodkin admitted that she couldn't be sure if her bill would have made the difference in this case. "But," she said, "it's a statement."

What's wrong with you Freepers? It's a statement. Don't you know that that is sufficient justification for any law?

8 posted on 03/24/2002 10:06:56 AM PST by Eugene Tackleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
From the article: "Both sides have numbers. The NRA will point out, for example, that more kids die from poison or falls or choking than from guns. But I still don't get the point."

He doesn't get the point that he is focussed on my right to keep and bear arms instead of licensing ladders, household chemicals, and water buckets. There should be licensing, background checks, and lengthy waiting periods mandated for all who would write such drivel.

9 posted on 03/24/2002 10:09:04 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Leftists are to American civil rights
as the A.I.D.S. virus is to health!

10 posted on 03/24/2002 10:15:25 AM PST by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
It's a simple proposition really. You either believe, as I do, that fewer guns make us safer or, as Charlton Heston does, that more guns make us safer.

Actually, it's whether you believe it is your right to protect yourself using the best tools available regardless of what someone else thinks will benefit society.

11 posted on 03/24/2002 10:18:17 AM PST by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
It won't make the streets any safer, either. But you already knew that. Perhaps, but it will make ME safer, and endanger the life a scumbag mugger.
12 posted on 03/24/2002 10:21:16 AM PST by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: D Joyce
You called?
14 posted on 03/24/2002 10:25:29 AM PST by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times;D Joyce
BWAHAHAHAHA!
15 posted on 03/24/2002 10:30:02 AM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Standing Wolf
"In 1997, 630 children under the age of 15 died from gunshot wounds in America." (Rocky Mountain News)"

And how many of those "children" were in gangs? Love how they use these BS numbers without giving any details. If that's the total number of gunshot related deaths in America then you better believe that a MINISCULE minority of that number are like the example this moron sites in his article (small child accidentally shooting himself). Yet they hold out that example as if all those 630 of those deaths were children accidentally shooting themselves.

So no 15 year olds gangbangers were shot to death that year? No kids were murdered that year with guns? Riigghhtt.
16 posted on 03/24/2002 10:41:59 AM PST by Green Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Borodkin admitted that she couldn't be sure if her bill would have made the difference in this case.

"But," she said, "it's a statement."

Oh, it's a statement of your superior moral concern, Rep. Borodkin? How sweet!
But maybe you could do that with greeting card from Hallmark, and let society as a whole protect itself according to its judgement of the various risks. Some of us might want criminals to fear the possibility that we might be armed . . .

17 posted on 03/24/2002 10:44:08 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: real saxophonist
I want to see a study or statistics that looks at gun deaths both adult and child, on a county by county basis. Then I want to see how those counties voted or what their political makeup is.

I want to see the study that supports my preconceived opinion. That you are far far more likely to die by gunshot in a democratic or liberal county than a conservative county. I believe that 80 to 90% of gun violence occurs in liberal strongholds. The study should rule out all accidental hunting deaths.

19 posted on 03/24/2002 11:02:16 AM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Because a little boy from Arvada, 3 years old, is in the hospital in critical condition...And there's a little girl in Aurora, CO who died from drinking Drano. And 3,000 dead folks from drowning in swimming pools, and 40,000 dead motorists on the nation's highways. We should never walk outside either because people who are struck by lightning. The Afghans have it right, live in a friggin cave... but with no firearms.

Nitwitt is a dope!

20 posted on 03/24/2002 11:22:14 AM PST by BulletBrasDotNet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson