Posted on 03/23/2002 4:46:11 PM PST by Notwithstanding
So women who take the pills have a higher chance of living forever?
I just wish women would wake up and begin realizing that these "experts" don't care about women at all!
I would recommend that you seek out a good natural/homeopathic doctor to at least discuss the symptoms and problems you are attempting to address by taking the chemical abortifacient "pill," read info from the "other side" and then make your decision. You owe it to yourself. You can't buy everything the people say who are raking in the billions $$.
I was married to one!
And I don't get my period. I have no uterus.
And without estrgen, I suffer depression, low energy, hot flashes and joints ache. And that's just the obvious symptons.
I really do not want to debate this endlessly. There is vast amounts of evidence in support of estrogen as well as the naysayers. I know how I feel with and without it. I choose with it. It's a personal choice, and the only known negative effect for me personally and my situation is the risk of breast cancer which is why I get screening every six months.
MOST WOMEN ARE NEVER MADE AWARE OF THE RISKS - the docs are too interested in foisting their own moral views upon their patients: be a good girl and take your Pill.
Honestly, after each of our four children was born my wife got harassed at the hospital because she refuses birth control and lets them know that she would never even consider using it. Each of these "medical professionals" has exhibit zero respect for my wife's choice.
Perhaps they are getting paid off or perked up by the drug companies and HMO's who find that pills are much cheaper than childbirth and each new child's health expenses? (paying for a few more Pill-induced illnesses each year is pennies compared to payig for the expense of labor and delivery, and a new child's healthcare.
Feeding hormones to healthy body systems in an attempt to make them disfunctional is NOT heath care. That is exactly what the pill does to a healthy woman (menopausal women notwithstanding).
Agree totally.
In my case, estrogen makes me functional----with a quality of life I could not have otherwise. About two months ago I stopped taking estrogen because I don't have health insurance. After a few weeks, I was willing to give up eating in order to get my script refilled!!!
Like all medicines, there is abuse and there is good use. Each case is an individual one based on the health circumstances of the person. I just hope people can keep an open mind and realize that for some of us (and I have received numerous private messages from women who agree with me and have encouraged me), estrogen benefits far outweigh the risks. Generalizations are dangerous, in this issue, as with all others. And most importantly, estrogen has uses other than birth control, although that was it's first use. It is no longer it's only use. Anyway, thanks for your information---and I will keep on reading (almost said "abreast" :~) ) on new studies and research.
|
You are in: Health | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, 26 March, 2002, 11:50 GMT Pill 'could boost cervical cancer risk' Long-term use of the contraceptive pill could increase the risk of developing cervical cancer in women with a sexually transmitted infection, researchers suggest. Women who are positive for the STI human papillomavirus (HPV) could be at up to three times greater risk of developing cancer if they have used the Pill for five years or longer. A four-fold increased risk was found for HPV-positive women who had taken the Pill for more than 10 years. But there is no evidence that long-term Pill use increases the risk of cervical cancer in women who do not have HPV. The virus is the main cause of cervical cancer, which killed around 1,250 UK women in 2000. An international panel of experts has looked at Pill use and HPV infection rates. In a paper published by The Lancet, they conclude long-term use of the Pill could be a contributory risk factor to developing cervical cancer in women with HPV.
They said the researchers had not proved that the Pill causes cervical cancer. And they said regular cervical screening would pick up signs of the disease early. 'Step in the process' Data for almost 1,900 women from studies carried out carried out in Thailand, the Philippines, Morocco, Brazil, Peru, Paraguay, Columbia and Spain was examined by scientists from the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The risk of cervical cancer ranges from 1% in developed countries to 5% in developing countries. Silvia Franceschi who led the study: "We think that our results lend support to the existence of an association between oral contraceptives and HPV. "They could help women who have persistent HPV infection to balance the benefits (prevention of pregnancy and cancers of the ovary and uterus) and harms of long-term oral contraceptive use, and suggest that long-term users of oral contraceptives should be included in cervical screening programmes." In a separate study, the IARC also found high numbers of pregnancies increases the risk of cervical cancer amongst HPV-positive women. David Skegg from the University of Otago, New Zealand, writing in a commentary in the Lancet, added: "Any causal relation between long-term oral contraception and cervical cancer would be most important in the developing world, where cervical cancer is common and few women have access to high-quality cytological screening. "From a public-health viewpoint, a key question is the extent to which effects persist after women stop taking oral contraceptives. "For nearly two decades, concerns about oral contraceptives and neoplasia were focused mainly on breast cancer-with the eventual outcome being reassuring. Ironically the relation with cervical cancer may turn out to be more important." He backed World Health Organization commissioned work to evaluate all the relevant data. 'No proof' Commenting on the findings looking at use of the Pill, HPV and cervical cancer, a spokeswoman for the Family Planning Association said: "The overall likelihood of getting cervical cancer in the UK is low whether you use the Pill for a long time of not." Dr Anne Szarewski, clinical consultant for Cancer Research UK, told BBC News Online: "This is certainly a very interesting study, but they have not actually proved that the Pill causes cervical cancer. "They have just shown that if you are HPV positive and take the Pill, you are at greater risk." Dr Szarewski said the most important thing for women in the UK to remember was that cervical screening would pick up any problems. She added that women should not be deterred from taking the Pill: "You have to balance this possible risk from the Pill against many known benefits, such as protection against ovarian and endometrial cancer." Women can reduce their risk of contracting HPV and other STIs by also using barrier methods of contraception. |
See also:
Internet links:
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Top Health stories now:
Links to more Health stories are at the foot of the page. |
Links to more Health stories
|
|
||
^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMII | News Sources | Privacy |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.