Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOW president warns of conservative agenda
The Times-Picayune ^ | 03/21/02 | Bruce Nolan

Posted on 03/21/2002 3:29:22 AM PST by chemicalman

NOW president warns of conservative agenda

Alumna returns for Loyola speech

03/21/02

By Bruce Nolan
Staff writer/The Times-Picayune

Kim Gandy, the former New Orleanian who heads the National Organization for Women, returned to her old law school Wednesday to warn of "ultra-conservative" judges' growing threat to a broad liberal agenda, while demonstrators protested her stand on abortion rights and claimed Loyola University had compromised its Catholic identity by inviting her.

For 55 minutes, Gandy sketched a vision of conservative federal appellate courts quietly dismantling legislation protecting the environment, employee rights and workplace safety standards.

The reversals are occurring in bits and pieces in complicated cases largely below media radar, she said.

"I'm scared to death, and I can't figure out how to make this into a sound bite," she told a warmly receptive audience.

Gandy mentioned abortion only briefly, warning that if the Bush administration gets three appointments to the Supreme Court, the 1973 abortion decision Roe v. Wade might be overturned.

Her audience of about 250 filled a classroom at Loyola's School of Law after passing through beefed-up security.

Bill Quigley, director of Loyola's Gillis Long Poverty Law Center, presented Gandy, a 1978 Loyola graduate, with an award for outstanding community service across a broad range of issues affecting women, the poor and minorities.

Outside, a crowd of about 75 demonstrators carried large illustrations of aborted fetuses and preached against abortion.

The protest was the climax of a storm that blew up suddenly and unexpectedly for Gandy and her hosts -- the law school, the university's Women's Resource Center, the Association of Women Law Students and the Long center.

Her hosts said they invited Gandy to recognize an uncommonly successful law school graduate whose views on politics and the judiciary might be of interest to the legal community.

Gandy said a local controversy was the last thing she expected when she accepted an invitation to return to her alma mater.

"I'm very surprised. I speak at law schools and universities all over the country, at least half a dozen in the last month, and literally have never received a reception like this," she said.

Loyola, however, is the first Catholic university she has addressed since assuming the NOW post last summer.

As a young New Orleans lawyer, Gandy said she was mentored by local Catholic legal and political leaders including former Mayor Moon Landrieu, former Vatican Ambassador Lindy Boggs and Janet Riley, a former law school professor.

"I have Lindy's autobiography in which she inscribed a wonderfully warm personal note to me," Gandy said.

"In New Orleans, you almost cannot be an activist and not work with people with whom you disagree on this issue because it's a divisive one in this city," she said of abortion.

"They thought I was wrong and I thought they were wrong. We agreed not to talk about it and find things we could work on together."

But a rare public rebuke of Loyola from Archbishop Alfred Hughes on Friday galvanized local abortion opponents and elements of the Catholic community, some of whom said they regarded Gandy's invitation as only the latest sign that Loyola was adrift from its Catholic moorings.

"Loyalty to the pope, not Loyola," read one sign outside the law school Wednesday night.

"I'm one offended alumna & one sad mom," read another carried by Jamie Easley, a former high school teacher who said she earned a master's degree at Loyola in 1997.

But many law students said they supported Gandy's appearance at Loyola for the opportunity to hear her views. Most said they did not think the school had compromised its Catholic identity in inviting her.

"This is a place of higher education where people are supposed to come express their views so students can form their own opinions," third-year law student Katie Green said. "Just because she's here doesn't mean that Loyola's agreeing with everything she's saying."

Bruce Nolan may be reached at

bnolan@timespicayune.com or (504) 826-3344.

© The Times-Picayune. Used with permission.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gandy; loyolauniversity; now
Shame on them.
1 posted on 03/21/2002 3:29:22 AM PST by chemicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
More and more, since they don't have any other issue, I wonderif the dems are going to run the 2002 campaign against the Supreme Court....all the pieces for that strategy, Florida 2000, Pickering, aborton, are all starting to pointin that direction..
2 posted on 03/21/2002 3:33:22 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
Well thankfully there IS somewhat of a "vast right wing conspiracy" PRAISE THE LORD!
3 posted on 03/21/2002 3:33:58 AM PST by katherineisgreat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I think you're onto a trend. What I note is the Left is peddling a fear-based agenda- and it has worked well for them in the past.
4 posted on 03/21/2002 3:38:01 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
Damn its a shame when the law trips up the liberals.
5 posted on 03/21/2002 3:40:09 AM PST by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
But many law students said they supported Gandy's appearance at Loyola for the opportunity to hear her views. Most said they did not think the school had compromised its Catholic identity in inviting her....

Bill Quigley, director of Loyola's Gillis Long Poverty Law Center, presented Gandy, a 1978 Loyola graduate, with an award for outstanding community service across a broad range of issues affecting women, the poor and minorities.


Of course her alma mater can invite her!! But did they have to give an award to her?

BTW, she's lucky that alma maters can't get abortions that kill their "pre-graduate" students.

6 posted on 03/21/2002 3:45:41 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
"I'm scared to death, and I can't figure out how to make this into a sound bite," she told a warmly receptive audience.

LOL!

7 posted on 03/21/2002 3:55:03 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
If you're ever unsure how to vote on an issue, just find out where NOW stands and vote the opposite way, and you'll be sure to be in the right.
8 posted on 03/21/2002 3:59:14 AM PST by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
The dems will use their tried and true race card campaign along with mediscare and social insecurity. The SC will just be added to the mix.
9 posted on 03/21/2002 4:09:50 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
"ultra-conservative" judges' growing threat to a broad liberal agenda

LOL!! Threat to a threat is called a defense. She ought to kinow the difference, but then again, when you and your organization are made op of one or two issue activists whom them selves are totally irrelevant then there is not too much to worry about as far as I am concerned.

She ought to join CWFA and see what a real womans organization concerned with womens issues is all about.

10 posted on 03/21/2002 4:24:02 AM PST by ICE-FLYER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
the Left is peddling a fear-based agenda- and it has worked well for them in the past.
The left is a fear-based agenda. That's why "objective journalists"--entertainers who hype bad news for their daily bread--and liberal politicians are interchangable parts. For that matter, the plaintiff bar is indistinguishable from either.

The main distintion among them is that journalists don't all have law degrees . . . but what do you bet that most journalists considered law before settling on J-school?

11 posted on 03/21/2002 5:23:09 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
Outside, a crowd of about 75 demonstrators carried large illustrations of aborted fetuses and preached against abortion.

I find their use of the word 'illustration' reprehensible. That implies it is a made-up/created drawing, and not necessarily an accurate representation. I'll bet you money they were carrying large PHOTOGRAPHS of aborted babies, and this paper just won't acknowledge that they were real pictures of real murdered babies.

I also find their use of the word 'preached' somewhat annoying, if predictable.

12 posted on 03/21/2002 5:31:12 AM PST by LibertyGirl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
"I'm very surprised. I speak at law schools and universities all over the country, at least half a dozen in the last month, and literally have never received a reception like this," she said.

Get used to it. Hopefully the silent majority has had enough and are not going to take it anymore.

13 posted on 03/21/2002 5:35:23 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Could someone explain why all the NOW lesbians are so all-fired interested in a woman's reproductive rights? It seems a non-sequitur.
14 posted on 03/21/2002 5:55:43 AM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Could someone explain why all the NOW lesbians are so all-fired interested in a woman's reproductive rights? It seems a non-sequitur.

They're odd?

15 posted on 03/21/2002 6:57:11 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman
"This is a place of higher education where people are supposed to come express their views so students can form their own opinions,"

If this were true, David Duke, Bin-Laden, and the head of the Illinois Nazi Party would have invitations everywhere.

16 posted on 03/21/2002 3:21:14 PM PST by Dumb_Ox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson